Robot Rock wrote:yosemiteben wrote:SWedd523 wrote:I find it hard to believe that they'd stick with him through all the bad press just to trade him for some seconds and dookie water
Not even the Charlotte FO is that dumb
Let's also throw Nic Richards in for unknown reasons.
Feels like PHX fans were like let's find a deal that matches our needs and figure out whatever junk we have to send in return and the other team will probably bite.
Sadly, that's 99% of our trade history, on the low end, since 2004. I'll see ridiculous things like "we'll give you Bridges for a top-50 protected future 2nd, and Seth Lundy" on Twitter, I'll say it's BS, and then Mitch will bite on that.
You will not be able to point to a single in season trade under Mitch that supports this take.
ETA: Even at a broader level, I don't see much support for the take that we historically have undervalued our players in trades and given them away for poor returns / draft equity.





















