Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson

Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

Better Defensively:

Ben Wallace
81
62%
David Robinson
49
38%
 
Total votes: 130

mdonnelly1989
Head Coach
Posts: 6,460
And1: 1,806
Joined: Aug 11, 2014
       

Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#1 » by mdonnelly1989 » Sun Feb 4, 2024 5:08 am

Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson
User avatar
KnixtapeH20
RealGM
Posts: 10,769
And1: 16,568
Joined: Feb 08, 2021
     

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#2 » by KnixtapeH20 » Sun Feb 4, 2024 5:12 am

What

Wallace.. close thread
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,217
And1: 66,944
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#3 » by Duke4life831 » Sun Feb 4, 2024 5:16 am

Im one to always pump up Robinson on this board. But with that said, Ben Wallace is still the best defensive player Ive ever seen.
jkvonny
General Manager
Posts: 7,536
And1: 7,462
Joined: Jun 04, 2021
       

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#4 » by jkvonny » Sun Feb 4, 2024 5:18 am

I voted DRob
:D
moderndarwin
Rookie
Posts: 1,208
And1: 1,305
Joined: Jul 17, 2013

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#5 » by moderndarwin » Sun Feb 4, 2024 5:30 am

I’ve never been more in awe of a defender than I was of a prime Ben Wallace. He is basically Draymond Green without the antics and stronger and more athletic.

There was a game against Philly and they had AI and watching Ben switch onto him block him, recover, block someone else, board and growl was one of the best sequences of basketball i’ve ever seen. He was an absolute menace out there. Impeccable timing, next level strength, desire, etc. His only weakness would be guarding one on one against a significantly bigger player that has post game like say a Joker in the post. That’s the sort of guy you’d be better throwing Rasheed on.

From my rankings Ben is a top 3 defensive player of all time. It’s a travesty in my eyes how overlooked he is when it comes to stuff like hall of fame and top ever player lists. I’d absolutely start a team with him.

People discounting the Admiral though. This is a lot closer than people are saying. Admiral could arguably be a top 10 defender of all time also.
HotelVitale
RealGM
Posts: 16,761
And1: 11,858
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Location: West Philly, PA

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#6 » by HotelVitale » Sun Feb 4, 2024 5:47 am

moderndarwin wrote: From my rankings Ben is a top 3 defensive player of all time. It’s a travesty in my eyes how overlooked he is when it comes to stuff like hall of fame and top ever player lists. I’d absolutely start a team with him. .

He had a really short prime, though, and also played in an era that maximized the impact of a guy like him. He wan't a starter til age 25 season and was pretty much done as a difference-maker by age 33 season. Somehow only made 4 AS teams too (tho probably deserved a couple more).
OxAndFox
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,551
And1: 3,100
Joined: May 17, 2022
Contact:

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#7 » by OxAndFox » Sun Feb 4, 2024 5:47 am

jkvonny wrote:I voted DRob
:D


Same. I'm just a sucker for the Admiral too though. The way he turned defense into offense was a thing of beauty.
Loved watching him block a shot, sprint down the floor, and get it back for a 2 handed slam off two feet.

And that's not the only reason I chose DRob. Don't forget this dude averaged 3 blocks per game over his career and went up against the greatest era of centers ever.
Both had a 95.6 Drtg.

Admiral had more blocks, more steals, same defensive rating so he was just as good with his feet, positioning and stopping the opposition. It's a good question, but ultimately the Admiral gets the nod.
jkvonny
General Manager
Posts: 7,536
And1: 7,462
Joined: Jun 04, 2021
       

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#8 » by jkvonny » Sun Feb 4, 2024 5:48 am

OxAndFox wrote:
jkvonny wrote:I voted DRob
:D


Same. I'm just a sucker for the Admiral too though. The way he turned defense into offense was a thing of beauty.
Loved watching him block a shot, sprint down the floor, and get it back for a 2 handed slam off two feet.

And that's not the only reason I chose DRob. Don't forget this dude averaged 3 blocks per game over his career and went up against the greatest era of centers ever.
Both had a 95.6 Drtg.

Admiral had more blocks, more steals, same defensive rating so he was just as good with his feet, positioning and stopping the opposition. It's a good question, but ultimately the Admiral gets the nod.

True!
He was a block machine, too!

He had the longer peak years career too.
FuShengTHEGreat
Analyst
Posts: 3,067
And1: 1,440
Joined: Jan 02, 2010

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#9 » by FuShengTHEGreat » Sun Feb 4, 2024 6:02 am

Definitely David Robinson for me.

The 95-96 Spurs lost Dennis Rodman (although probably a case of addition by subtraction) from the previous season and started a combination of arguably the slowest/undersized backcourt in NBA history in Vinny Del Negro and Avery Johnson.

Everyone else on the Spurs' roster that season defensively wasn't anything to write home about. And Bob Hill was a lousy coach on top of that.

Yet San Antonio finished the year ranked 3rd in Dtrg.

When has Ben Wallace ever meant as much to a team defensively as 95-96 David Robinson?

Answer: Never!
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,542
And1: 20,096
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#10 » by MrBigShot » Sun Feb 4, 2024 6:08 am

FuShengTHEGreat wrote:Definitely David Robinson for me.

The 95-96 Spurs lost Dennis Rodman (although probably a case of addition by subtraction) from the previous season and started a combination of arguably the slowest/undersized backcourt in NBA history in Vinny Del Negro and Avery Johnson.

Everyone else on the Spurs' roster that season defensively wasn't anything to write home about. And Bob Hill was a lousy coach on top of that.

Yet San Antonio finished the year ranked 3rd in Dtrg.

When has Ben Wallace ever meant as much to a team defensively as 95-96 David Robinson?

Answer: Never!


03-04
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
FuShengTHEGreat
Analyst
Posts: 3,067
And1: 1,440
Joined: Jan 02, 2010

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#11 » by FuShengTHEGreat » Sun Feb 4, 2024 6:12 am

MrBigShot wrote:
FuShengTHEGreat wrote:Definitely David Robinson for me.

The 95-96 Spurs lost Dennis Rodman (although probably a case of addition by subtraction) from the previous season and started a combination of arguably the slowest/undersized backcourt in NBA history in Vinny Del Negro and Avery Johnson.

Everyone else on the Spurs' roster that season defensively wasn't anything to write home about. And Bob Hill was a lousy coach on top of that.

Yet San Antonio finished the year ranked 3rd in Dtrg.

When has Ben Wallace ever meant as much to a team defensively as 95-96 David Robinson?

Answer: Never!


03-04


Nah
OxAndFox
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,551
And1: 3,100
Joined: May 17, 2022
Contact:

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#12 » by OxAndFox » Sun Feb 4, 2024 6:12 am

jkvonny wrote:
OxAndFox wrote:
jkvonny wrote:I voted DRob
:D


Same. I'm just a sucker for the Admiral too though. The way he turned defense into offense was a thing of beauty.
Loved watching him block a shot, sprint down the floor, and get it back for a 2 handed slam off two feet.

And that's not the only reason I chose DRob. Don't forget this dude averaged 3 blocks per game over his career and went up against the greatest era of centers ever.
Both had a 95.6 Drtg.

Admiral had more blocks, more steals, same defensive rating so he was just as good with his feet, positioning and stopping the opposition. It's a good question, but ultimately the Admiral gets the nod.

True!
He was a block machine, too!

He had the longer peak years career too.


Well. Just so people understand.
David Freaking Robinson made the All Defensive Team a total of 8 times in times in his 14 seasons.
Ben Wallace, another all time great, made the All Defensive Team a total of 6 times in 16 seasons.

Wallace has the defensive player on the year award 4 times to 1 which is significant the other way.
You let us know if it looked a little easier during Ben Wallace's prime versus Robinsons.

1989-90 to 2002-03
Rodman
Rodman
Admiral
Hakeem
Hakeem
Mutombo
GP 1.0
Mutumbo
Mutumbo
Mourning
Mourning
Mutumbo
Wallace
Wallace

1996-97 to 2011-12
Mutumbo
Mutumbo
Mourning
Mourning
Mutumbo
Wallace
Wallace
Artest
Wallace
Wallace
Camby
Garnett
Howard
Howard
Howard
Chandler
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,721
And1: 9,552
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#13 » by bstein14 » Sun Feb 4, 2024 6:14 am

I'm a big David Robinson fan and I think he's underrated in most all-time lists... he's a top 10 defender of all-time but he wasn't as impactful as Ben Walllace was as a team defender. I David was better as a man to man low post defender but Ben moved so well all over the place and really elevated the defensive level of his entire team with the way he would go to work on that end. Also the longevity issue I don't think is a great argument for David Robinson either because he entered the NBA at age 24 and he was amazing his first 7 years and then got injured for an entire season, they got Duncan and then David immediately took a back seat to Duncan. David's first 7 years in the league tho are probably top 5 all-time as far as a 7 year stretch to start an NBA career.
OxAndFox
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,551
And1: 3,100
Joined: May 17, 2022
Contact:

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#14 » by OxAndFox » Sun Feb 4, 2024 6:21 am

MrBigShot wrote:
FuShengTHEGreat wrote:Definitely David Robinson for me.

The 95-96 Spurs lost Dennis Rodman (although probably a case of addition by subtraction) from the previous season and started a combination of arguably the slowest/undersized backcourt in NBA history in Vinny Del Negro and Avery Johnson.

Everyone else on the Spurs' roster that season defensively wasn't anything to write home about. And Bob Hill was a lousy coach on top of that.

Yet San Antonio finished the year ranked 3rd in Dtrg.

When has Ben Wallace ever meant as much to a team defensively as 95-96 David Robinson?

Answer: Never!


03-04


To be fair. Ben had Rasheed and Tay on the team. Sure it was a historic defense, but not sure that's what he was asking.

Oh, Doc Rivers was the pesky defensive guard with DRob, for 15mpg, and other than that it was nothing. Sean Elliott was a god awful defender and they had old man Chuck Person then too. Crazy.
FuShengTHEGreat
Analyst
Posts: 3,067
And1: 1,440
Joined: Jan 02, 2010

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#15 » by FuShengTHEGreat » Sun Feb 4, 2024 6:52 am

OxAndFox wrote:
MrBigShot wrote:
FuShengTHEGreat wrote:Definitely David Robinson for me.

The 95-96 Spurs lost Dennis Rodman (although probably a case of addition by subtraction) from the previous season and started a combination of arguably the slowest/undersized backcourt in NBA history in Vinny Del Negro and Avery Johnson.

Everyone else on the Spurs' roster that season defensively wasn't anything to write home about. And Bob Hill was a lousy coach on top of that.

Yet San Antonio finished the year ranked 3rd in Dtrg.

When has Ben Wallace ever meant as much to a team defensively as 95-96 David Robinson?

Answer: Never!


03-04


To be fair. Ben had Rasheed and Tay on the team. Sure it was a historic defense, but not sure that's what he was asking.

Oh, Doc Rivers was the pesky defensive guard with DRob, for 15mpg, and other than that it was nothing. Sean Elliott was a god awful defender and they had old man Chuck Person then too. Crazy.


Yes. The year after Ben Wallace left Detroit for Chicago they only slipped 2 spots from the previous season in Dtrg and were in the top 10 in the league.

You take Robinson away from the 95-96 Spurs and they probably couldn't even stop the NCAA champion Kentucky Wildcats that year much less a NBA team. I dont see any version of Ben Wallace capable of leading that Spurs team to a #3 ranked defense.

Robinson was better.
User avatar
baldur
RealGM
Posts: 11,029
And1: 13,525
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#16 » by baldur » Sun Feb 4, 2024 7:17 am

I can't think of more than a few better defensive players than Wallace. Rodman probably? Robinson arguably? Who else?
Yoshun
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,915
And1: 5,550
Joined: Dec 24, 2012
       

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#17 » by Yoshun » Sun Feb 4, 2024 7:20 am

I'd say Ben Wallace here.

Obviously DRob was the much better player though.
User avatar
CodeBreaker
Head Coach
Posts: 6,248
And1: 5,938
Joined: Jul 21, 2017
 

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#18 » by CodeBreaker » Sun Feb 4, 2024 8:51 am

Ben Wallace, it's not that close
Image
jpengland
General Manager
Posts: 7,610
And1: 6,939
Joined: Jan 22, 2014
   

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#19 » by jpengland » Sun Feb 4, 2024 9:58 am

Ben Wallace.

He's the best defensive player I have ever seen. Hands down.
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,827
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: Better Defensively: Ben Wallace or David Robinson 

Post#20 » by HeartBreakKid » Sun Feb 4, 2024 10:28 am

jpengland wrote:Ben Wallace.

He's the best defensive player I have ever seen. Hands down.

better than me?

Return to The General Board