PG: Thank You Buzz For Your Service. Fk Lebron

[aggo]

You noticed the way AD altered so many shots and Knicks players shied away from attacking the rim because of his presence in the paint? That's the same way other teams react to Mitch that iHart, for all he has shown in toughness and energy, doesn't provide the same deterrent.

Even if iHart is resigned as the starter going forward there's an element of paint dominance that Mitch has which few others in the league bring and would be a luxury to have coming off the bench, so enough of the trading him as a throw in nonsense, you people have such short memories.

Go to nba.com

Sort defensive fg% inside 6ft


Do it for last year and this year and ‘21. Look up ihart and Mitch


You’ll be surprised. Just fyi the analytics data does not support (and never has) Mitch being significantly better defender.

You can sort iso, pnr, shots inside 6ft. I’ve looked at them all over the last 2 years.

https://www.nba.com/stats/players/defense-dash-lt6?CF=PLAYER_POSITION*NE*G:GP*G*30&dir=A&sort=PLUSMINUS

[Knicksman780]

Thibs refuses to use his bench, this game was lost in the beginning of the fourth

what bench?

This man used a 6 man rotation,

he has NBA players on his bench, Jeffries, Taj, Fournie, Flynn…

he refuses to use them, to keep his starters fresh u til the end, blame him for them being gassed at the end

Knicks have a 10 man rotation. Problem is 3 of the bench players were starting. One (Grimes) was in street clothes. Then you got Deuce. The rest are not good enough to be in the rotation.

We were behind the 8 ball to start this game. Even so, we still won 9/10 and are looking like a very solid team that is a serious threat if everyone can get healthy. We aren't going to win every single game and the Message Board Coaching of shoulda/coulda isn't going to change the outcome on these type of games. Maybe Fournier helps...but maybe they target him and we're down double digits to enter the 4th. It is what it is...

[Stannis]

Even at 39, LeBron is still the King of MSG

[DaGawd]

Even at 39, LeBron is still the King of MSG

barely

[stuporman]

You noticed the way AD altered so many shots and Knicks players shied away from attacking the rim because of his presence in the paint? That's the same way other teams react to Mitch that iHart, for all he has shown in toughness and energy, doesn't provide the same deterrent.

Even if iHart is resigned as the starter going forward there's an element of paint dominance that Mitch has which few others in the league bring and would be a luxury to have coming off the bench, so enough of the trading him as a throw in nonsense, you people have such short memories.

Go to nba.com

Sort defensive fg% inside 6ft


Do it for last year and this year and ‘21. Look up ihart and Mitch


You’ll be surprised. Just fyi the analytics data does not support (and never has) Mitch being significantly better defender.

You can sort iso, pnr, shots inside 6ft. I’ve looked at them all over the last 2 years.

https://www.nba.com/stats/players/defense-dash-lt6?CF=PLAYER_POSITION*NE*G:GP*G*30&dir=A&sort=PLUSMINUS

So according your stat IHart is better than AD, Giannis. Chet, Wemby, Embiid and a half dozen other players who when watching the game present supreme paint intimidation but since your fetish stat says iHart is better than all them, that's what you are going to try and tell us? Good luck with that.

That the difference between someone who watches games and someone who watches stats, they can see the difference in the game.

[KnixtapeH20]

Even at 39, LeBron is still the King of MSG

barely

Lol seriously, how is he the king? He had 24 points and they barely won with us missing FOUR starters Mitch, OG, RANDLE AND Grimes.... that's insane

The ONLY King of NY is BruNYson

[KnixtapeH20]

You noticed the way AD altered so many shots and Knicks players shied away from attacking the rim because of his presence in the paint? That's the same way other teams react to Mitch that iHart, for all he has shown in toughness and energy, doesn't provide the same deterrent.

Even if iHart is resigned as the starter going forward there's an element of paint dominance that Mitch has which few others in the league bring and would be a luxury to have coming off the bench, so enough of the trading him as a throw in nonsense, you people have such short memories.

Go to nba.com

Sort defensive fg% inside 6ft


Do it for last year and this year and ‘21. Look up ihart and Mitch


You’ll be surprised. Just fyi the analytics data does not support (and never has) Mitch being significantly better defender.

You can sort iso, pnr, shots inside 6ft. I’ve looked at them all over the last 2 years.

https://www.nba.com/stats/players/defense-dash-lt6?CF=PLAYER_POSITION*NE*G:GP*G*30&dir=A&sort=PLUSMINUS

So according your stat IHart is better than AD, Giannis. Chet, Wemby, Embiid and a half dozen other players who when watching the game present supreme paint intimidation but since your fetish stat says iHart is better than all them, that's what you are going to try and tell us? Good luck with that.

That the difference between someone who watches games and someone who watches stats, they can see the difference in the game.

Aggo HATES Mitch... he does this back n forth EVERY season. It's well documented he flip flops on him mostly flops to his credit.

[rajajackal]

mitch can do a number of things that hartenstein cannot do. that goes both ways. mitch is way more of a lob threat, hartenstein can pass and has a solid hook and floater. ihart is relentless, but guys don't even wanna step to mitch at some point. that's why i think that if we're keeping both, you have to start mitch. that level of physical domination is more useful in the big time starter moments and hartenstein's skills are probably more useful in the meat and potatoes of the game

[NiceLikeChrist]

mitch can do a number of things that hartenstein cannot do. that goes both ways. mitch is way more of a lob threat, hartenstein can pass and has a solid hook and floater. ihart is relentless, but guys don't even wanna step to mitch at some point. that's why i think that if we're keeping both, you have to start mitch. that level of physical domination is more useful in the big time starter moments and hartenstein's skills are probably more useful in the meat and potatoes of the game

But you also have to consider their free throw ability in close game situations. Mitch is a huge liability at the foul line.

I’m all for starting Mitch but I hope the 3rd and 4th quarter is a game by game thing which is don’t trust Thibs with at all. He makes one rotation and dies with it until his hand is forced.

[TheGreenArrow]

Read on Twitter

?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

Tim his is why I don’t want any part of this guy on my Knicks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Keep lefraud away at all costs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[3toheadmelo]

mitch can do a number of things that hartenstein cannot do. that goes both ways. mitch is way more of a lob threat, hartenstein can pass and has a solid hook and floater. ihart is relentless, but guys don't even wanna step to mitch at some point. that's why i think that if we're keeping both, you have to start mitch. that level of physical domination is more useful in the big time starter moments and hartenstein's skills are probably more useful in the meat and potatoes of the game

hartenstein unlocks brunson's and randle's game even further though since he is a threat on offense. and we still had the best defense in the league with ihart, og, randle, brunson. its a no brainer to me which one to start. our defense didnt really drop and we our offense is even better.

[robillionaire]

You noticed the way AD altered so many shots and Knicks players shied away from attacking the rim because of his presence in the paint? That's the same way other teams react to Mitch that iHart, for all he has shown in toughness and energy, doesn't provide the same deterrent.

Even if iHart is resigned as the starter going forward there's an element of paint dominance that Mitch has which few others in the league bring and would be a luxury to have coming off the bench, so enough of the trading him as a throw in nonsense, you people have such short memories.

Go to nba.com

Sort defensive fg% inside 6ft


Do it for last year and this year and ‘21. Look up ihart and Mitch


You’ll be surprised. Just fyi the analytics data does not support (and never has) Mitch being significantly better defender.

You can sort iso, pnr, shots inside 6ft. I’ve looked at them all over the last 2 years.

https://www.nba.com/stats/players/defense-dash-lt6?CF=PLAYER_POSITION*NE*G:GP*G*30&dir=A&sort=PLUSMINUS

So according your stat IHart is better than AD, Giannis. Chet, Wemby, Embiid and a half dozen other players who when watching the game present supreme paint intimidation but since your fetish stat says iHart is better than all them, that's what you are going to try and tell us? Good luck with that.

That the difference between someone who watches games and someone who watches stats, they can see the difference in the game.

The stats are right. Fans eyes are wrong. This has been proven over and over. I’m not naming the players names.

Sorry Chanel

[rajajackal]

mitch can do a number of things that hartenstein cannot do. that goes both ways. mitch is way more of a lob threat, hartenstein can pass and has a solid hook and floater. ihart is relentless, but guys don't even wanna step to mitch at some point. that's why i think that if we're keeping both, you have to start mitch. that level of physical domination is more useful in the big time starter moments and hartenstein's skills are probably more useful in the meat and potatoes of the game

hartenstein unlocks brunson's and randle's game even further though since he is a threat on offense. and we still had the best defense in the league with ihart, og, randle, brunson. its a no brainer to me which one to start. our defense didnt really drop and we our offense is even better.

we never got to see the starting lineup with mitch and without the rj problem holding the offense back yet though. just saying

[Deeeez Knicks]

Read on Twitter

?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

Tim his is why I don’t want any part of this guy on my Knicks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Keep lefraud away at all costs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He came into msg wearing Knicks colors too. He’s just doing it for the attention

[Clyde_Style]

Read on Twitter

?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

Tim his is why I don’t want any part of this guy on my Knicks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Keep lefraud away at all costs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ha ha ha

Lebron was also using all of the suckers here to do his bidding. We want Lebron! they squealed as his counted his fat stacks in L.A.

[3toheadmelo]

mitch can do a number of things that hartenstein cannot do. that goes both ways. mitch is way more of a lob threat, hartenstein can pass and has a solid hook and floater. ihart is relentless, but guys don't even wanna step to mitch at some point. that's why i think that if we're keeping both, you have to start mitch. that level of physical domination is more useful in the big time starter moments and hartenstein's skills are probably more useful in the meat and potatoes of the game

hartenstein unlocks brunson's and randle's game even further though since he is a threat on offense. and we still had the best defense in the league with ihart, og, randle, brunson. its a no brainer to me which one to start. our defense didnt really drop and we our offense is even better.

we never got to see the starting lineup with mitch and without the rj problem holding the offense back yet though. just saying

fair point

[Clyde_Style]

Go to nba.com

Sort defensive fg% inside 6ft


Do it for last year and this year and ‘21. Look up ihart and Mitch


You’ll be surprised. Just fyi the analytics data does not support (and never has) Mitch being significantly better defender.

You can sort iso, pnr, shots inside 6ft. I’ve looked at them all over the last 2 years.

https://www.nba.com/stats/players/defense-dash-lt6?CF=PLAYER_POSITION*NE*G:GP*G*30&dir=A&sort=PLUSMINUS

So according your stat IHart is better than AD, Giannis. Chet, Wemby, Embiid and a half dozen other players who when watching the game present supreme paint intimidation but since your fetish stat says iHart is better than all them, that's what you are going to try and tell us? Good luck with that.

That the difference between someone who watches games and someone who watches stats, they can see the difference in the game.

The stats are right. Fans eyes are wrong. This has been proven over and over. I’m not naming the players names.

Sorry Chanel

Well Known Fact: NOT watching games is the proven way to judge performance.

Watching games clouds the mind. Abstaining from viewing the contest eliminates subjective bias.

[Guano]

Read on Twitter

?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

Tim his is why I don’t want any part of this guy on my Knicks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Keep lefraud away at all costs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hopefully he uses us to win his next ring, Greens!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Spree2Houston]

Read on Twitter

?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

Tim his is why I don’t want any part of this guy on my Knicks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Keep lefraud away at all costs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Gutless cowards who actually wanted him here

[knicksNOTslick]

Even at 39, LeBron is still the King of MSG

You can't be King when you're always the away team at the Garden. The real kings have the balls to actually play for New York knowing the pressure and attention that comes with it, and that every player, from stars down to the scrubs, is giving it their all to shine in the bright lights of MSG.