vincecarter4pres wrote:Now watch us beat the Mavs on the back end of the back to back. I’ll take it lol.
We’ve seen the same thing all season
No Simmons = bad lottery team
Given his limited availability, we need someone else who can run an offence
Moderators: NyCeEvO, Rich Rane
vincecarter4pres wrote:Now watch us beat the Mavs on the back end of the back to back. I’ll take it lol.
vincecarter4pres wrote:Rich Rane wrote:NetsJets wrote:This lineup is too small
Pretty sure Marks would read this as a sign for more guards.
I think he’s moved on to wings only. Maybe Yormark is back, saw a marketing opportunity and they’re transitioning to a name change, Brooklyn Red Bulls?
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Rich Rane wrote:vincecarter4pres wrote:Rich Rane wrote:
Pretty sure Marks would read this as a sign for more guards.
I think he’s moved on to wings only. Maybe Yormark is back, saw a marketing opportunity and they’re transitioning to a name change, Brooklyn Red Bulls?
Should be Brooklyn Matadors to match this defense.
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
ArksNetsSince99 wrote:Why are we getting people suspended here ? It’s to many of us or something ?
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
ArksNetsSince99 wrote:Why are we getting people suspended here ? It’s to many of us or something ?
Decipher wrote:vincecarter4pres wrote:Now watch us beat the Mavs on the back end of the back to back. I’ll take it lol.
We’ve seen the same thing all season
No Simmons = bad lottery team
Given his limited availability, we need someone else who can run an offence
Netaman wrote:vincecarter4pres wrote:Netaman wrote:
the issue wasnt camt making green unnecessary, it was do we really want more inefficient scorers who only impact games when they are running hot?
All I’m saying is, not only is Green the more complete player, he still has true star, borderline superstar potential, as unlikely as it is he hits the latter.
Cam T is just an elite scorer who tries unsuccessfully on defense, and has absolutely brutal tunnel vision, which I never see changing much. He not only doesn’t impact the game when he’s off, but he literally almost singlehandedly shoots you out of it.
I get he’s only 22 and has room to grow, but he’ll almost certainly always be a blinders on gunner.
I try so hard to get pumped for him, but my opinion hasn’t changed much overall, you trade him immediately for an upgrade, or on draft night for a lotto pick, before the potential label has lost it’s luster, the contract extension comes and the games start to matter a lot more.
I think it’s **** ing laughable a lot of Nets fans have been saying he’s similar to Maxey lately.
but but but look at the record when cam starts!!!!
jk we agree on cam, which is why im a pass if the best piece for bridges is has a 53% ts% in year 3. id much sooner just trade cam + din + the late first they can get for dfs for murray.
Eatgreenz wrote:Netaman wrote:vincecarter4pres wrote:All I’m saying is, not only is Green the more complete player, he still has true star, borderline superstar potential, as unlikely as it is he hits the latter.
Cam T is just an elite scorer who tries unsuccessfully on defense, and has absolutely brutal tunnel vision, which I never see changing much. He not only doesn’t impact the game when he’s off, but he literally almost singlehandedly shoots you out of it.
I get he’s only 22 and has room to grow, but he’ll almost certainly always be a blinders on gunner.
I try so hard to get pumped for him, but my opinion hasn’t changed much overall, you trade him immediately for an upgrade, or on draft night for a lotto pick, before the potential label has lost it’s luster, the contract extension comes and the games start to matter a lot more.
I think it’s **** ing laughable a lot of Nets fans have been saying he’s similar to Maxey lately.
but but but look at the record when cam starts!!!!
jk we agree on cam, which is why im a pass if the best piece for bridges is has a 53% ts% in year 3. id much sooner just trade cam + din + the late first they can get for dfs for murray.
Exactly take those games out when Ben played CamT record is the same if he starts or off the bench. Ben playing is the only reason CamT starting can be a thing. You can not build a team around a 6'2 sg he can be a piece but some foundational trade everyone build around him stop it.
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
ArksNetsSince99 wrote:Decipher wrote:vincecarter4pres wrote:Now watch us beat the Mavs on the back end of the back to back. I’ll take it lol.
We’ve seen the same thing all season
No Simmons = bad lottery team
Given his limited availability, we need someone else who can run an offence
I gave up on Ben , I don’t necessarily blame him , he is just not healthy and I doubt he ever be
Maybe in a contract year
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
vincecarter4pres wrote:Eatgreenz wrote:Netaman wrote:
but but but look at the record when cam starts!!!!
jk we agree on cam, which is why im a pass if the best piece for bridges is has a 53% ts% in year 3. id much sooner just trade cam + din + the late first they can get for dfs for murray.
Exactly take those games out when Ben played CamT record is the same if he starts or off the bench. Ben playing is the only reason CamT starting can be a thing. You can not build a team around a 6'2 sg he can be a piece but some foundational trade everyone build around him stop it.
Am wondering at this point if he is the piece that will push through the Murray trade while only sending out a lotto protected 1st and Dinwiddie, and if so if the FO feels the same and includes him?
I’m conflicted on Murray as well, he feels like a bit of a polarizing person behind the scenes, but on the court he seems like he has his teammates backs and a ton of passion for the game.