Golden State saves $106 Million (GWS/OKC/WAS)
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Re: Golden State saves $106 Million (GWS/OKC/WAS)
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 70,069
- And1: 22,484
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: Golden State saves $106 Million (GWS/OKC/WAS)
I don't see why OKC wouldn't do this. One extremely late FRP in a really crappy draft is a very small price to pay to shed some salary and add Chris Paul for the playoffs. OKC already has 12 guys under contract next year before adding 3 other FRP's to the roster.
Re: Golden State saves $106 Million (GWS/OKC/WAS)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,647
- And1: 6,310
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: Golden State saves $106 Million (GWS/OKC/WAS)
NW wrote:If just was just trying to save money, it’s a good deal, but all reports are there’s no demand from ownership in that regard and any move will be about improving the team now.
CP3 is an expiring this year or can be one next year. Should be able to do better for the asset imo
He’s an expiring this year. We’re not going to guarantee him $30 million for next year in the hopes that we can trade him for something we want. Not with our lux tax problems.
Lacob’s prime directive may not be to save but you bet your butt that if he can save 100 million dollars with little impact on the on-court product he’s gonna do it.
Re: Golden State saves $106 Million (GWS/OKC/WAS)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,034
- And1: 617
- Joined: Jul 22, 2004
- Location: Warriorsworld
-
Re: Golden State saves $106 Million (GWS/OKC/WAS)
gswhoops wrote:NW wrote:If just was just trying to save money, it’s a good deal, but all reports are there’s no demand from ownership in that regard and any move will be about improving the team now.
CP3 is an expiring this year or can be one next year. Should be able to do better for the asset imo
He’s an expiring this year. We’re not going to guarantee him $30 million for next year in the hopes that we can trade him for something we want. Not with our lux tax problems.
Lacob’s prime directive may not be to save but you bet your butt that if he can save 100 million dollars with little impact on the on-court product he’s gonna do it.
We’ll see-particularly if the team shares your belief that letting him and that salary slot walk is “little impact”. How else do you propose the team adds a major piece?
Re: Golden State saves $106 Million (GWS/OKC/WAS)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,357
- And1: 2,801
- Joined: Jun 24, 2001
-
Re: Golden State saves $106 Million (GWS/OKC/WAS)
I think all parties would do this deal.
Would prefer Bagley since I think GS needs size over backup pg because Podz has performed.
Would prefer Bagley since I think GS needs size over backup pg because Podz has performed.
Re: Golden State saves $106 Million (GWS/OKC/WAS)
- Thabo Sefolosha
- Thunder Forum The Opening Tip
- Posts: 3,426
- And1: 6,662
- Joined: Oct 29, 2013
-
Return to Trades and Transactions