Bucks News, Transactions, Trade Ideas - Gallo deciding between Bucks and Clippers

SupremeHustle · Post #401 » by **SupremeHustle** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 8:25 pm

yannisk wrote:

Read on Twitter

I bet somehow, some way, this makes Luke Ridnour anxious.

Post #402 » by **MickeyDavis** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 8:27 pm

ABucksFan wrote:Horst is a fun GM to have, he will do something and if he doesn't it's not because he didnt try lol

Yeah he's always very proactive from what I understand. Whereas Hammond waited for others to initiate. Sometimes the best deals are the one's you don't make so we'll see what happens. As has been said many times in this thread, we simply don't have a lot of tradeable assets that other teams will covet. We can easily be outbid on anyone we are interested in.

kanyon · Post #403 » by **kanyon** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 8:37 pm

Random question--when a pick is protected, "lottery/top 10" whatever... does that mean you don't get the pick if it falls within that zone? And if that happens, then are you just screwed or does it roll over to a different year?

BroncoBuck · Post #404 » by **BroncoBuck** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 8:42 pm

kanyon wrote:Random question--when a pick is protected, "lottery/top 10" whatever... does that mean you don't get the pick if it falls within that zone? And if that happens, then are you just screwed or does it roll over to a different year?

The teams set additional rules as to how it conveys.

j_hilge444 · Post #405 » by **j_hilge444** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 8:52 pm

kanyon wrote:Random question--when a pick is protected, "lottery/top 10" whatever... does that mean you don't get the pick if it falls within that zone? And if that happens, then are you just screwed or does it roll over to a different year?

You're correct. For example, a pick can be top 10 protected, then the next year top 20 protected, then the following year no protection.

raferfenix · Post #406 » by **raferfenix** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 8:54 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:As has been said many times in this thread, we simply don't have a lot of tradeable assets that other teams will covet. We can easily be outbid on anyone we are interested in.

Just takes 1 team to seriously value Bobby to make a lot else possible.

drdrG · Post #407 » by **drdrG** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 8:56 pm

Haven't heard any rumors about it and don't know how we can make it work but would love to see Herb Jones on this team.

stellation · Post #408 » by **stellation** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 8:57 pm

mediocrityrules wrote:
mlloyd10 wrote:On a side note - None of you are BrewCityPaul are you? I forgot that tool block me years ago for me calling him out and now he keeps pooping up on my timeline

Nobody wants that on their timeline

Pretty sure we have at least one German on here.

BroncoBuck · Post #409 » by **BroncoBuck** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 9:04 pm

j_hilge444 wrote:
kanyon wrote:Random question--when a pick is protected, "lottery/top 10" whatever... does that mean you don't get the pick if it falls within that zone? And if that happens, then are you just screwed or does it roll over to a different year?

You're correct. For example, a pick can be top 10 protected, then the next year top 20 protected, then the following year no protection.

It can also become 2 seconds or something like that. Those fake first round pick trades were happening so much a few years back.

Shaffty · Post #410 » by **Shaffty** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 9:06 pm

Would you do

Schroeder for Patt/Cam/2027 2nd

BuckFan25226 · Post #411 » by **BuckFan25226** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 9:10 pm

Shaffty wrote:Would you do

Schroeder for Patt/Cam/2027 2nd

Dennis it is!

Thanks, Shafty!

Need another defensive wing though.

MVP2110 · Post #412 » by **MVP2110** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 9:10 pm

Shaffty wrote:Would you do

Schroeder for Patt/Cam/2027 2nd

No

Frank Nova · Post #413 » by **Frank Nova** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 9:10 pm

Shaffty wrote:Would you do

Schroeder for Patt/Cam/2027 2nd

Sure would.

soxperry · Post #414 » by **soxperry** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 9:13 pm

Shaffty wrote:Would you do

Schroeder for Patt/Cam/2027 2nd

Lol

In a gd heartbeat

Ron Swanson · Post #415 » by **Ron Swanson** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 9:15 pm

Don't see what the point of Schroder would even be. What's with this weird idea that we need to upgrade the 10-15 minutes of the backup PG spot?

German Athens · Post #416 » by **German Athens** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 9:16 pm

Shaffty wrote:Would you do

Schroeder for Patt/Cam/2027 2nd

Yes, we still need guys who can beat someone off the dribble, particularly without a screen. Schroeder would help.

Turk Nowitzki · Post #417 » by **Turk Nowitzki** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 9:20 pm

Shaffty wrote:Would you do

Schroeder for Patt/Cam/2027 2nd

He's the best player in that deal so i guess so. :-?

BuckFan25226 · Post #418 » by **BuckFan25226** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 9:21 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:Don't see what the point of Schroder would even be. What's with this weird idea that we need to upgrade the 10-15 minutes of the backup PG spot?

Him and Dame would be a very disruptive backcourt offensively. DS is a very good defender and would be nice next to dame. If he's playing well, I would play him more than 20 min a game, some in a primary back up pg role, and some with Dame.

j_hilge444 · Post #419 » by **j_hilge444** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 9:24 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:Don't see what the point of Schroder would even be. What's with this weird idea that we need to upgrade the 10-15 minutes of the backup PG spot?

Have you seen our bench lately? He would play much more than 10-15 minutes.

WeekapaugGroove · Post #420 » by **WeekapaugGroove** » Wed Feb 7, 2024 9:25 pm

BuckFan25226 wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:Don't see what the point of Schroder would even be. What's with this weird idea that we need to upgrade the 10-15 minutes of the backup PG spot?

Him and Dame would be a very disruptive backcourt offensively. DS is a very good defender and would be nice next to dame. If he's playing well, I would play him more than 20 min a game, some in a primary back up pg role, and some with Dame.

I'm not so sure about your 'very good defender' comment. He is pretty long though so probably can survive short stints alongside Dame.

Trade just depends if you feel like Pat can contribute or not, if not then I guess it's using a guy who you don't want in the court to moderately upgrade Paynes spot. Who cares about the 2nd.

Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app