mattao313 wrote:Didn't LA offer us a 1st a couple seasons ago for Bojan? I'd rather have that distance 1st than this trade.Billl wrote:It's pretty funny how many people toss around "we should trade xyz player for a first." Aging role players on the worst team in the NBA just don't have that kind of value. And certainly they don't have the value of one of our own picks with declining protections.
Sent from my SM-A528B using RealGM mobile app
Fans always latch onto that type of reporting after the fact, but it's just some reporter speculating. Besides, Bojan is 34 now. He's still got a spot in the league, but aging guys who can shoot but not defend just don't have the much trade value. That's how we got him for cheap to begin with.