HiJiNX wrote:The first 10-15 games were very very bad. The next handful were less bad but still bad. Since then, the issue has been more about:
-roster turnover
-Poeltl being hurt and having no NBA caliber backup center
The offence looks much better but there are some issues there in terms of figuring out roles. I think Darko sometimes is too guard heavy in how he wants to run things. But overall, I’m not mad about the offence anymore. In fact, I’m pretty happy with the offence most nights.
The defence has been mostly trash this season, but I’ve noticed some system improvements over the past two weeks. The biggest flash of improvement was the first half of that OKC game where we looked very very good on D. So we know we can get there. It’s now just a matter of getting there consistently.
Finally, I want to see better game management down the stretch. We have definitely given away a handful of games due to having the wrong guys on the court or not being deliberate enough with our possessions at the end of games.
Overall, there is clear growth from early in the season. I’m not sold but I don’t think he’s as bad as people think he is either. He’s just in a situation where the team is bad and nobody wants to blame the young players for not being good enough yet so the blame has to fall somewhere.
If Darko was absolutely perfect, at best we are a .500 team.
He deserves the rest of the year to show what he can do with a roster somewhat suited to his coaching style and with no more absurd turnover.
The benefits of trading OG and Pascal in December were that it gives the Knicks and Pacers a longer "runway" with those guys. The downside for us is it extended the roster uncertainty and transactional portion of the season. We basically had a month of clown ball with injuries and guys waiting to be traded.