Onus wrote:EvanZ wrote:Literally just told on yourself.
LMAO at backing kyle after this. Kyle looking at college stats to get his information. LMAO
Completely unprepared.
I'm backing using logic, not emotion.
Moderators: Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose
Onus wrote:EvanZ wrote:Literally just told on yourself.
LMAO at backing kyle after this. Kyle looking at college stats to get his information. LMAO
Completely unprepared.
EvanZ wrote:Onus wrote:EvanZ wrote:Literally just told on yourself.
LMAO at backing kyle after this. Kyle looking at college stats to get his information. LMAO
Completely unprepared.
I'm backing using logic, not emotion.
Onus wrote:EvanZ wrote:Onus wrote:LMAO at backing kyle after this. Kyle looking at college stats to get his information. LMAO
Completely unprepared.
I'm backing using logic, not emotion.
what logic?
EvanZ wrote:Onus wrote:EvanZ wrote:
I'm backing using logic, not emotion.
what logic?
You've already seen the logic and heard the logic Kyle gave you. Their logic was that they took into account the likelihood of getting to the third possession. You simply can't ignore that just because it didn't happen. That's called hindsight bias. Do I know that Kyle was correct? No, I don't. But I also don't know that deferring was the correct decision.
As I have said again and again here NOBODY actually knows the math on this one. Not you, not me. Not Andy Reid. Not the talking asses on ESPN. NOBODY. So in the absence of actual knowledge I literally can't blame Kyle for making a mistake in that situation because we don't know what the right choice was.
But what I do see is a lot of emotion and biases at work. It's literally Monday morning quarterbacking. I can't stand it.
Onus wrote:EvanZ wrote:Onus wrote:what logic?
You've already seen the logic and heard the logic Kyle gave you. Their logic was that they took into account the likelihood of getting to the third possession. You simply can't ignore that just because it didn't happen. That's called hindsight bias. Do I know that Kyle was correct? No, I don't. But I also don't know that deferring was the correct decision.
As I have said again and again here NOBODY actually knows the math on this one. Not you, not me. Not Andy Reid. Not the talking asses on ESPN. NOBODY. So in the absence of actual knowledge I literally can't blame Kyle for making a mistake in that situation because we don't know what the right choice was.
But what I do see is a lot of emotion and biases at work. It's literally Monday morning quarterbacking. I can't stand it.
LMAO he used college OT data to come to that conclusion. What a bunch of buffoonery.
In the absence of usable statistics probably shouldn't use a completely different sport's ot as data. LMAO
EvanZ wrote:Onus wrote:EvanZ wrote:
You've already seen the logic and heard the logic Kyle gave you. Their logic was that they took into account the likelihood of getting to the third possession. You simply can't ignore that just because it didn't happen. That's called hindsight bias. Do I know that Kyle was correct? No, I don't. But I also don't know that deferring was the correct decision.
As I have said again and again here NOBODY actually knows the math on this one. Not you, not me. Not Andy Reid. Not the talking asses on ESPN. NOBODY. So in the absence of actual knowledge I literally can't blame Kyle for making a mistake in that situation because we don't know what the right choice was.
But what I do see is a lot of emotion and biases at work. It's literally Monday morning quarterbacking. I can't stand it.
LMAO he used college OT data to come to that conclusion. What a bunch of buffoonery.
In the absence of usable statistics probably shouldn't use a completely different sport's ot as data. LMAO
That doesn't seem logical and it is also odd to say college football is a completely different sport...it is not gymnastics. It is not basketball. It's football with fairly similar OT rules. So your suggestion is instead of (quite logically) using a similar set of data, he should have used nothing? Should he have called you up Mr. Game Theory? Maybe he didn't have your number.
Either way you seem too emotional to have a rational conversation about it. Go cry your feelings out and come back when you want to talk through it calmly.
EvanZ wrote:Regardless of whether you used nothing or used something, the only fact we actually know is that there was a non-zero chance of a third possession before the coin was flipped. If you deny that, then you are objectively wrong here.
EvanZ wrote:Regardless of whether you used nothing or used something, the only fact we actually know is that there was a non-zero chance of a third possession before the coin was flipped. If you deny that, then you are objectively wrong here.
cdubbz wrote:Donte DiVincenzo will outplay Poole this season.
Onus wrote:EvanZ wrote:Regardless of whether you used nothing or used something, the only fact we actually know is that there was a non-zero chance of a third possession before the coin was flipped. If you deny that, then you are objectively wrong here.
Keep moving those goal posts ... you'll get there eventually
Return to Golden State Warriors