Ball for Zion?
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Ball for Zion?
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 999
- And1: 78
- Joined: Jan 03, 2003
- Location: Naperville, IL
Ball for Zion?
Would the Hornets and Pelicans both benefit from a trade of their oft-injured cornerstones in the off season?
Simple trade: LaMelo for Zion with whatever draft compensation you feel is necessary. They could also add G. Williams from CHA and a wing from NOP to fill needs the two clubs will have after the trade goes through.
Why this swap make sense for the Hornets: Charlotte is going through an ownership and management transition. Starting over with Zion, who is from North Carolina, would be a great start to the new regime. Yes, he has been out of shape and injured, but perhaps playing in the state he grew up and played college ball in would light a fire under him. As far as losing Ball, they just acquired two point guards in Micic and Mann. Neither is as good (obviously), but they could get the job done with the ball going through Miller and Zion. They will also have a high draft pick this summer, which they could use to draft or trade for a solid, starting wing. Their new lineup:
PG...Mann...Micic
SG...Miller...FA or draft
SF...FA or Draft / Bridges...Martin
PF...Zion...Williams
C...Williams...Richards
Why this swap make sense for the Pelicans: With most of their team healthy this year, New Orleans is hovering above .500. Part of the problem is that Zion does not look the same as he did when he began his career with the team. One has to question if he is happy there. If they want to compete for a championship, their current team doesn't appear to have that high of a ceiling. By acquiring Ball, they acquire a big guard who would compliment CJ in the backcourt. Their new big three would be Ball, CJ and Ingram. They could then resign Valanciunas on a team friendly deal (he is a decent center, just not a great fit with Zion) and package some of their picks / young players for a starting PF. Their new lineup:
PG...Ball...Alvarado
SG...McCollum...Daniels...Hawkins
SF...Ingram...Jones...Murphy III
PF...FA or trade...Nance Jr.
C...Valanciunas...FA or draft
Thoughts?
Simple trade: LaMelo for Zion with whatever draft compensation you feel is necessary. They could also add G. Williams from CHA and a wing from NOP to fill needs the two clubs will have after the trade goes through.
Why this swap make sense for the Hornets: Charlotte is going through an ownership and management transition. Starting over with Zion, who is from North Carolina, would be a great start to the new regime. Yes, he has been out of shape and injured, but perhaps playing in the state he grew up and played college ball in would light a fire under him. As far as losing Ball, they just acquired two point guards in Micic and Mann. Neither is as good (obviously), but they could get the job done with the ball going through Miller and Zion. They will also have a high draft pick this summer, which they could use to draft or trade for a solid, starting wing. Their new lineup:
PG...Mann...Micic
SG...Miller...FA or draft
SF...FA or Draft / Bridges...Martin
PF...Zion...Williams
C...Williams...Richards
Why this swap make sense for the Pelicans: With most of their team healthy this year, New Orleans is hovering above .500. Part of the problem is that Zion does not look the same as he did when he began his career with the team. One has to question if he is happy there. If they want to compete for a championship, their current team doesn't appear to have that high of a ceiling. By acquiring Ball, they acquire a big guard who would compliment CJ in the backcourt. Their new big three would be Ball, CJ and Ingram. They could then resign Valanciunas on a team friendly deal (he is a decent center, just not a great fit with Zion) and package some of their picks / young players for a starting PF. Their new lineup:
PG...Ball...Alvarado
SG...McCollum...Daniels...Hawkins
SF...Ingram...Jones...Murphy III
PF...FA or trade...Nance Jr.
C...Valanciunas...FA or draft
Thoughts?
My Dream Team
PG...Magic Johnson...Steph Curry
SG...Michael Jordan...Kobe Bryant
SF...Larry Bird...Elgin Balyor
PF...Tim Duncan...Hakeem Olajuwon
C...Kareem Abdul-Jabbar...Wilt Chamberlain
PG...Magic Johnson...Steph Curry
SG...Michael Jordan...Kobe Bryant
SF...Larry Bird...Elgin Balyor
PF...Tim Duncan...Hakeem Olajuwon
C...Kareem Abdul-Jabbar...Wilt Chamberlain
Re: Ball for Zion?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,918
- And1: 2,185
- Joined: Mar 19, 2016
-
Re: Ball for Zion?
I_Love_This_Game!! wrote:Would the Hornets and Pelicans both benefit from a trade of their oft-injured cornerstones in the off season?
Simple trade: LaMelo for Zion with whatever draft compensation you feel is necessary. They could also add G. Williams from CHA and a wing from NOP to fill needs the two clubs will have after the trade goes through.
Why this swap make sense for the Hornets: Charlotte is going through an ownership and management transition. Starting over with Zion, who is from North Carolina, would be a great start to the new regime. Yes, he has been out of shape and injured, but perhaps playing in the state he grew up and played college ball in would light a fire under him. As far as losing Ball, they just acquired two point guards in Micic and Mann. Neither is as good (obviously), but they could get the job done with the ball going through Miller and Zion. They will also have a high draft pick this summer, which they could use to draft or trade for a solid, starting wing. Their new lineup:
PG...Mann...Micic
SG...Miller...FA or draft
SF...FA or Draft / Bridges...Martin
PF...Zion...Williams
C...Williams...Richards
Why this swap make sense for the Pelicans: With most of their team healthy this year, New Orleans is hovering above .500. Part of the problem is that Zion does not look the same as he did when he began his career with the team. One has to question if he is happy there. If they want to compete for a championship, their current team doesn't appear to have that high of a ceiling. By acquiring Ball, they acquire a big guard who would compliment CJ in the backcourt. Their new big three would be Ball, CJ and Ingram. They could then resign Valanciunas on a team friendly deal (he is a decent center, just not a great fit with Zion) and package some of their picks / young players for a starting PF. Their new lineup:
PG...Ball...Alvarado
SG...McCollum...Daniels...Hawkins
SF...Ingram...Jones...Murphy III
PF...FA or trade...Nance Jr.
C...Valanciunas...FA or draft
Thoughts?
You would have to send some serious pick considerations for the Hornets to even consider this. I'm talking cost prohibitive pick compensation.
Zion has all the potential in the world but when you factor in his injury history and lack of discipline he's a huge risk. If it were possible for a superstar to be considered a buy low candidate Zion would be that guy. Hell, even with the natural talent discrepency heavily weighing in favor of Zion I would hesitate to choose him over Randle straight up. Availability is an ability all its on and generally speaking only one of those two guys has that ability.
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential
and still be treated as if you were reasonable.

Re: Ball for Zion?
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 999
- And1: 78
- Joined: Jan 03, 2003
- Location: Naperville, IL
Re: Ball for Zion?
Availability is an ability all its on and generally speaking only one of those two guys has that ability.
LaMelo has not exactly been the picture of health his first few years in the league either. Just sayin'.
My Dream Team
PG...Magic Johnson...Steph Curry
SG...Michael Jordan...Kobe Bryant
SF...Larry Bird...Elgin Balyor
PF...Tim Duncan...Hakeem Olajuwon
C...Kareem Abdul-Jabbar...Wilt Chamberlain
PG...Magic Johnson...Steph Curry
SG...Michael Jordan...Kobe Bryant
SF...Larry Bird...Elgin Balyor
PF...Tim Duncan...Hakeem Olajuwon
C...Kareem Abdul-Jabbar...Wilt Chamberlain
Re: Ball for Zion?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,918
- And1: 2,185
- Joined: Mar 19, 2016
-
Re: Ball for Zion?
I_Love_This_Game!! wrote:Availability is an ability all its on and generally speaking only one of those two guys has that ability.
LaMelo has not exactly been the picture of health his first few years in the league either. Just sayin'.
True but the difference is that Zion's injury problems could possibly be mitigated by a willingness to watch his weight and he's shown absolutely zero interest in doing that.
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential
and still be treated as if you were reasonable.

Re: Ball for Zion?
- Mrakar
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,104
- And1: 3,907
- Joined: Sep 01, 2010
Re: Ball for Zion?
Knickfan1982 wrote:I_Love_This_Game!! wrote:Availability is an ability all its on and generally speaking only one of those two guys has that ability.
LaMelo has not exactly been the picture of health his first few years in the league either. Just sayin'.
True but the difference is that Zion's injury problems could possibly be mitigated by a willingness to watch his weight and he's shown absolutely zero interest in doing that.
Lets not pretend like Melo has done anything to prove he is more willing to become a NBA superstar then Zion.
I think this is a deal where both teams are in "He is more worth to us then to you" mode and there is a slim chance of deal happening.
Re: Ball for Zion?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,646
- And1: 6,308
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: Ball for Zion?
Mrakar wrote:Knickfan1982 wrote:I_Love_This_Game!! wrote:
LaMelo has not exactly been the picture of health his first few years in the league either. Just sayin'.
True but the difference is that Zion's injury problems could possibly be mitigated by a willingness to watch his weight and he's shown absolutely zero interest in doing that.
Lets not pretend like Melo has done anything to prove he is more willing to become a NBA superstar then Zion.
I think this is a deal where both teams are in "He is more worth to us then to you" mode and there is a slim chance of deal happening.
What does this even mean?
Zion's weight issues, and his unwillingness to do anything about them, are pretty well documented. I don't see anything remotely equivalent for LaMelo.
Re: Ball for Zion?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,505
- And1: 477
- Joined: Feb 16, 2016
Re: Ball for Zion?
I am certainly of the mindset a team is either a championship contender or should be making moves to get there.
With that in mind, Charlotte moves Ball for Suggs, Isaacs, Black and FRPs in 24, 25, and 26 from the Magic.
Hornets defense becomes outstanding, a lot of size, and as good as Ball is, is he going to lead them deep in the playoffs?
With that in mind, Charlotte moves Ball for Suggs, Isaacs, Black and FRPs in 24, 25, and 26 from the Magic.
Hornets defense becomes outstanding, a lot of size, and as good as Ball is, is he going to lead them deep in the playoffs?
Re: Ball for Zion?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,998
- And1: 2,833
- Joined: Aug 22, 2020
-
Re: Ball for Zion?
Personally, I think Pels would be better off doing Ingram (to 3rd team) + Daniels for Ball. Add picks as needed.
JVal
Zion
Murphy | Herb
McCollum
Ball
Maybe 3rd team is Memphis? Get Hornets a top 6 pick to go with own top 3 pick.
JVal
Zion
Murphy | Herb
McCollum
Ball
Maybe 3rd team is Memphis? Get Hornets a top 6 pick to go with own top 3 pick.
Re: Ball for Zion?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,227
- And1: 640
- Joined: Jun 02, 2022
-
Re: Ball for Zion?
I doubt they are the same tier players
Re: Ball for Zion?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,709
- And1: 3,618
- Joined: Jul 31, 2009
Re: Ball for Zion?
When I saw the title, I was honestly unsure which Ball we were talking about, Lamelo or Lonzo. Obviously Lonzo would require significant value coming with him, and a SERIOUS hope he could come back somewhat as his old self. But I also don't see a Zion/Lamelo swap without significant value headed OUT from the Pelicans. Also, I wouldn't give up Lamelo for the Ingram/Daniels package, just not enough upside there for Charlotte, in my opinion. Probably just ends up as "both sides say no"...
Re: Ball for Zion?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,373
- And1: 3,061
- Joined: Feb 09, 2017
-
Re: Ball for Zion?
esvl wrote:I doubt they are the same tier players
I think they are
Not a believer in Zion’s mental or physical approach, but I see Melo as kind of gimmicky and not on track to become a serious franchise PG
Re: Ball for Zion?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,460
- And1: 2,077
- Joined: Oct 27, 2001
- Location: Newfoundland
Re: Ball for Zion?
If Topic is there for Charlotte to draft it's a fun idea.
Topic-Miller-Bridges-Zion-Williams with a bench of Micic, Grant Williams and Nick Richards and just under 25M left in free agency (or via trade) to grab a backup wing. Monk would be ideal, but probably Gary Trent is more realistic.
I think I like it less for New Orleans. Zion is the more impactful player and I'm not sure the Pels can count on turning their extra firsts into a real difference maker at center they would need. If Ingram says he'll sign an extension if this deal gets done I like it more. That opens up some possibilities like trading multiple firsts for a center or moving Hawkins or Trey Murphy even with the added perimeter depth. There's not a lot of quality bigs you could see getting moved though.
Maybe I'm too down on LaMelo, but I think New Orleans is the team that passes if the deal is straight up. Feels like it would be easier to just keep the same team, move Ingram for a guard or center if he won't sign an extension or just more draft picks. Zion is only 23, everyone else who matters there apart from JV and McCollum are young and Zion-Jones-Murphy is a good forward group, Hawkins and Daniels are decent young guards. You can always trade for say DeJounte Murray via Ingram to the Hawks or a 3rd team and the return to Atlanta and maybe grab a center, even burn a first to get Hartenstein on a sign and trade for instance.
Topic-Miller-Bridges-Zion-Williams with a bench of Micic, Grant Williams and Nick Richards and just under 25M left in free agency (or via trade) to grab a backup wing. Monk would be ideal, but probably Gary Trent is more realistic.
I think I like it less for New Orleans. Zion is the more impactful player and I'm not sure the Pels can count on turning their extra firsts into a real difference maker at center they would need. If Ingram says he'll sign an extension if this deal gets done I like it more. That opens up some possibilities like trading multiple firsts for a center or moving Hawkins or Trey Murphy even with the added perimeter depth. There's not a lot of quality bigs you could see getting moved though.
Maybe I'm too down on LaMelo, but I think New Orleans is the team that passes if the deal is straight up. Feels like it would be easier to just keep the same team, move Ingram for a guard or center if he won't sign an extension or just more draft picks. Zion is only 23, everyone else who matters there apart from JV and McCollum are young and Zion-Jones-Murphy is a good forward group, Hawkins and Daniels are decent young guards. You can always trade for say DeJounte Murray via Ingram to the Hawks or a 3rd team and the return to Atlanta and maybe grab a center, even burn a first to get Hartenstein on a sign and trade for instance.
Where's the D?
Re: Ball for Zion?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,727
- And1: 628
- Joined: May 26, 2007
-
Re: Ball for Zion?
BoogieTime wrote:esvl wrote:I doubt they are the same tier players
I think they are
Not a believer in Zion’s mental or physical approach, but I see Melo as kind of gimmicky and not on track to become a serious franchise PG
This is what I think of when I see or hear this player talk. Maybe it's because of how he was raised in the spotlight, but he seems goofy and not about the right things. I'd be open to trading Zion for a lot of players / deals. Wouldn't be enthused about LaMelo on my team I watch. And more importantly, David Griffin is all about "high character, professionalism, human-ness." So I doubt he has Ball on his target list. Yes, Zion also has some concerns like that, but it's almost inherited from a player that's already on the team (and didn't show character/proffessionalism concerns before he was drafted), not traded for like this Ball trade would be.
Re: Ball for Zion?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,881
- And1: 1,786
- Joined: Jul 19, 2010
-
Re: Ball for Zion?
Why do you hate Pelican fans? Finally gets rid of an injury prone player and get a even more injury prone one in return. How about they get someone that plays at least 50 games a year?
Re: Ball for Zion?
- JDR720
- Forum Mod - Hornets
- Posts: 44,107
- And1: 45,544
- Joined: Jul 09, 2013
-
Re: Ball for Zion?
LaMelo (when he plays of course) has been steadily improving. Whereas Zion has stagnated if not regressed.
And I think it's more likely LaMelo's ankles get better than Zion taking his weight seriously. For his flash, Melo does take being a basketball player seriously.
And I think it's more likely LaMelo's ankles get better than Zion taking his weight seriously. For his flash, Melo does take being a basketball player seriously.
Re: Ball for Zion?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,955
- And1: 13,582
- Joined: Dec 22, 2011
Re: Ball for Zion?
Stale old boomers on realgm that think fashion is more a sign of lack of professionalism than literally being 75lbs overweight for 3 years straight for pro athletes. Society moved past this 20 years ago, after tattoos and dreads 

Re: Ball for Zion?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,998
- And1: 2,833
- Joined: Aug 22, 2020
-
Re: Ball for Zion?
Ell Curry wrote: You can always trade for say DeJounte Murray via Ingram to the Hawks or a 3rd team and the return to Atlanta and maybe grab a center, even burn a first to get Hartenstein on a sign and trade for instance.
I thought Ingram (3rd team?) + JVal for Murray + Capela was obvious trade at deadline. Value to taste and both teams win trade.
Re: Ball for Zion?
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,054
- And1: 834
- Joined: Mar 08, 2018
Re: Ball for Zion?
I tend to say no to almost every trade but I don't like the idea of trading straight up (to suggest we add value is crazy). If we trade Zion, I'd rather it be for a disgruntled perennial all-star vet. If we're trading for someone like Melo, I'd rather offer up Hawkins/Murphy, JV/Nance and a couple of picks. I'm more than content rocking with Zion for another 5 years, he has a higher ceiling than Melo.
Re: Ball for Zion?
- Mrakar
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,104
- And1: 3,907
- Joined: Sep 01, 2010
Re: Ball for Zion?
JDR720 wrote:LaMelo (when he plays of course) has been steadily improving. Whereas Zion has stagnated if not regressed.
And I think it's more likely LaMelo's ankles get better than Zion taking his weight seriously. For his flash, Melo does take being a basketball player seriously.
Lamelo's FG% has been stagnating, 3pt% is worse, he has more turnovers. Yes he has more points, but at what cost, he is bellow league average in efficiency by quite a margin.
Return to Trades and Transactions