eyriq wrote:?t=iADo9KObiHXKmNe6MzMjaA&s=19
With the way he played yesterday, he deserved it. He understood that this was a national media game and he was great.
But one game does not cast out Paolo.
Moderators: Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCFJayBird, UCF, Knightro
eyriq wrote:?t=iADo9KObiHXKmNe6MzMjaA&s=19
eyriq wrote:?t=iADo9KObiHXKmNe6MzMjaA&s=19
Optimus_Steel wrote:Knightro wrote:eyriq wrote:What sucks about the loss is that all the Magic alumni were there to see it. Gotta leave a bitter taste in Mosley's mouth.
I don't think it's that big of a deal. They have another game to prepare for tomorrow, ya know?
You’re kidding if you don’t think this was deflating with the circumstances.

ORLMagicGirl15 wrote:eyriq wrote:?t=iADo9KObiHXKmNe6MzMjaA&s=19
With the way he played yesterday, he deserved it. He understood that this was a national media game and he was great.
But one game does not cast out Paolo.
tiderulz wrote:ORLMagicGirl15 wrote:eyriq wrote:?t=iADo9KObiHXKmNe6MzMjaA&s=19
With the way he played yesterday, he deserved it. He understood that this was a national media game and he was great.
But one game does not cast out Paolo.
different roles. Williams isnt seeing the better defenders every night, and plays next to Chet and SGA. easier to look very good when you are a good player and the 3rd option.
tiderulz wrote:ORLMagicGirl15 wrote:eyriq wrote:?t=iADo9KObiHXKmNe6MzMjaA&s=19
With the way he played yesterday, he deserved it. He understood that this was a national media game and he was great.
But one game does not cast out Paolo.
different roles. Williams isnt seeing the better defenders every night, and plays next to Chet and SGA. easier to look very good when you are a good player and the 3rd option.
Knightro wrote:eyriq wrote:We just didn't come to play tonightthelead wrote:they've got splits of 54/46/100....
I mean no disrespect, but I just dislike this this kind of "analysis" so much.
Effort was not the issue whatsoever tonight. The Magic played hard.
The issue tonight is that that Oklahoma City is REALLY FREAKING GOOD and a lot more talented than Orlando.
They have played an A+ game on both ends.
pepe1991 wrote:OKC expolited non existing offense of Isaac and Fultz
It's getting ridicilous at this point. It's worst than Ben Simmons. Guy is spending time, at 6'3- on dunker's spot or in corner leaving team to play 4 on 5.
Isaac was served with same . He was flat out ignored in corner, as Holmgren kept defending paint instad of him.
In general this is what good teams do to onedimensional players. They take them out of game or leveradge their limitations to their own adventage.

Skybox wrote:pepe1991 wrote:OKC expolited non existing offense of Isaac and Fultz
It's getting ridicilous at this point. It's worst than Ben Simmons. Guy is spending time, at 6'3- on dunker's spot or in corner leaving team to play 4 on 5.
Isaac was served with same . He was flat out ignored in corner, as Holmgren kept defending paint instad of him.
In general this is what good teams do to onedimensional players. They take them out of game or leveradge their limitations to their own adventage.
This is an example to think about. Isaac’s defensive impact is otherworldly, so you live with the fact that, so far, he’s offensively inept. Fultz as stated for over a year now, doesn’t have enough “other stuff” to make this picture forgivable
eyriq wrote:OKC's offensive rating was 127.6, +7.2 points above their average.
In our house, against our top 5 defense. Fully healthy.
Frankly, we wet the bed.
Fortune Teller wrote:Skybox wrote:pepe1991 wrote:OKC expolited non existing offense of Isaac and Fultz
It's getting ridicilous at this point. It's worst than Ben Simmons. Guy is spending time, at 6'3- on dunker's spot or in corner leaving team to play 4 on 5.
Isaac was served with same . He was flat out ignored in corner, as Holmgren kept defending paint instad of him.
In general this is what good teams do to onedimensional players. They take them out of game or leveradge their limitations to their own adventage.
This is an example to think about. Isaac’s defensive impact is otherworldly, so you live with the fact that, so far, he’s offensively inept. Fultz as stated for over a year now, doesn’t have enough “other stuff” to make this picture forgivable
Yeah, this is crazy and unacceptable. No one is even looking in Fultz's direction, much less guarding him. Not even a side-eye to his corner.
This is Fultz's 6th year on the roster, Isaac's 7th. They are the two highest-paid players on the team. Welt extended both of them. Presti would never. Honestly, I don't know of another GM in the league who would still be paying these guys $17 mil+ in Year 6 and Year 7.
JBSouthpaw wrote:Optimus_Steel wrote:Knightro wrote:
I don't think it's that big of a deal. They have another game to prepare for tomorrow, ya know?
You’re kidding if you don’t think this was deflating with the circumstances.
They were playing the team with the 3rd best record in the NBA, it wasn't like they were playing a team below .500, THAT would have been deflating.

JoshuaPotter wrote:eyriq wrote:OKC's offensive rating was 127.6, +7.2 points above their average.
In our house, against our top 5 defense. Fully healthy.
Frankly, we wet the bed.
While this statement is true. We also played a very good team instead of a randomly poor, randomly good offensive team.
These are not the same.
The bigger issue is our lack of offense was exploited.
Fortune Teller wrote:Yeah, this is crazy and unacceptable. No one is even looking in Fultz's direction, much less guarding him. Not even a side-eye to his corner.
This is Fultz's 6th year on the roster, Isaac's 7th. They are the two highest-paid players on the team. Welt extended both of them. Presti would never. Honestly, I don't know of another GM in the league who would still be paying these guys $17 mil+ in Year 6 and Year 7.

JoshuaPotter wrote:Awe chums. OKC is just such a great team and an example of perfect team building. How did they manage to build out of the draft 2x is just so very very impressive to me.
The question is, will this team be able to avoid the drama of the OG OKC gang? Or will they also not be able to afford their really really deep talent roster? Time will tell. They are almost, too good.
I really loved seeing us in the game as long as we are. Paolo going 20/10 isn't a "check your glasses" moment. I think that is the future. Team just has to make shots around him.
eyriq wrote:JoshuaPotter wrote:eyriq wrote:OKC's offensive rating was 127.6, +7.2 points above their average.
In our house, against our top 5 defense. Fully healthy.
Frankly, we wet the bed.
While this statement is true. We also played a very good team instead of a randomly poor, randomly good offensive team.
These are not the same.
The bigger issue is our lack of offense was exploited.
Yeah, OKC is good. We just beat the Wolves on the road though, we beat the Celtics by 17 at home, etc. We can beat good teams. With defense. The instant a great offense plays above their norm against us we are cooked. Zero chance to win. Our offense just isn't good enough.
So that's a bad look, right? We let a great offense be even better than normal.
Here's what irks me. Fultz over AB. It has to end, and the ball is clearly in Mosley's court. The organization has zero commitment to Fultz. None. Yet he plays. Not because he's earned it but because... I don't know, have to ask Mosley that one.
Not playing AB isn't the reason we lost, but little decisions like this make an impact at the margins.
Knightro wrote:JoshuaPotter wrote:Awe chums. OKC is just such a great team and an example of perfect team building. How did they manage to build out of the draft 2x is just so very very impressive to me.
The question is, will this team be able to avoid the drama of the OG OKC gang? Or will they also not be able to afford their really really deep talent roster? Time will tell. They are almost, too good.
I really loved seeing us in the game as long as we are. Paolo going 20/10 isn't a "check your glasses" moment. I think that is the future. Team just has to make shots around him.
I mean I laid it out already lol.
OKC could have absolutely kept the Westbrook/Schroder/George/Grant/Adams core together and added to it in the summer of 2019 and probably won 50+ games in 2019-2020.
But they opted to go in a completely different direction and were armed with two all-stars (eventually 3 as they acquired and then flipped Chris Paul as well) and several high end role players that they were able to trade away to kickstart their rebuild.
That's a whole lot more than most teams have when they decide to play tank ball.