ImageImageImageImage

Looks like Cabrera can be had for prospects

User avatar
vonclay
Sophomore
Posts: 135
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Location: Palm Bay, Fl.

Looks like Cabrera can be had for prospects 

Post#1 » by vonclay » Wed Nov 7, 2007 4:16 am

I'd like to see us make a move for him if we don't have to purge our farm system.
User avatar
Pugsley_2491
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,253
And1: 3
Joined: Aug 29, 2007

Re: Looks like Cabrera can be had for prospects 

Post#2 » by Pugsley_2491 » Wed Nov 7, 2007 4:22 am

vonclay wrote:I'd like to see us make a move for him if we don't have to purge our farm system.


which is exactly what FLA will ask of you guys and any other team. and quite honestly an overweight bad defensive third basemen is not worth it, unless of course you can get him without giving too much because he's still a great batter but think about it. for you guys they'll prolly ask for something like ellsbury and lester/bucholz and for us over in NY they'll ask for something like melky/cano and joba or hughes. If i was brian cashman or theo i would deffinitly not trade for miggy. just wait till he hits free agency which is next year anyways.
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#3 » by Bleeding Green » Wed Nov 7, 2007 4:52 am

He's more than a great batter. He's a Pujols/A-Rod/Bonds type hitter; a generational talent that just destroys baseballs. Put him at first and have David Ortiz and Manny yell at him in Spanish to get in shape.

Ellsbury, Lester and Lars Anderson under the assumption that you can sign him long-term. If not, just wait until free agency comes around.

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/unfiltered/?p=662
* Alex Rodriguez isn
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
User avatar
maseda17
Senior
Posts: 571
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 17, 2006

 

Post#4 » by maseda17 » Wed Nov 7, 2007 11:12 am

His long term position is likely LF which would be fine as he can move there after this season when Manny walks. I imagine the package to get him would be similar to getting Johan and I'd prefer Johan.
Image
eitanr
General Manager
Posts: 8,454
And1: 329
Joined: Nov 26, 2003

 

Post#5 » by eitanr » Thu Nov 8, 2007 7:29 pm

I think the Sox have a better shot at Miggy than Santana. The Cost would be Ellsbury and Lester. In the short term, the Sox could try Miggy at 1st with Youk at first. In the long term, he is Manny's replacememt...which is not too far away than you think.
Read the best NBA Articles on the Web right here, delivering innovative insights and a unique perspectives on all the happenings of the league.

http://fullcourtanalytics.blogspot.com/
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,745
And1: 229
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#6 » by sunshinekids99 » Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:44 pm

Because of their astronomical asking price, the Marlins likely won't move Miguel Cabrera prior to the winter meetings, SI.com's Jon Heyman reports.

They might as well shoot for the moon, as he'll still have a ton of value at the All-Star break. According to Heyman, the Marlins are currently asking for four top youngsters from inquiring teams like the Angels, Yankees, Dodgers and White Sox.



From rotoworld.com
Image
User avatar
canman1971
Senior Mod - Celtics
Senior Mod - Celtics
Posts: 14,944
And1: 8,980
Joined: May 13, 2003
Location: 18 Championship BLVD
       

 

Post#7 » by canman1971 » Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:54 pm

You only trade young, upcoming guys for pitching, like the Beckett deal. You don't do it for a hitter and one that has gained a lot of weight quickly.
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#8 » by Bleeding Green » Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:03 pm

Why?

Cabrera is in the midst of a hall of fame career and he's likely not even hit his prime yet.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
GregB
RealGM
Posts: 11,923
And1: 2,999
Joined: Sep 21, 2004
Location: South Shore, MA
     

 

Post#9 » by GregB » Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:40 am

I really like Bucholz but I think if push came to shove. I could move him in a deal for Miggy. I dont see us trading Ellsbury though. IMO, He has more value to the team right now. He is most likely our starting CF next year and leadoff hitter. IMO, We have enough starting pitching depth to live without Bucholz.
User avatar
Flash3
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 52,635
And1: 403
Joined: Oct 21, 2004
Location: L-I-M-R

 

Post#10 » by Flash3 » Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:32 pm

We have enough starting pitching depth to live without Bucholz.
No team has enough starting pitching, ever. The more the merrier.
Mars wrote:You can't stop the asterisk... you can only hope to contain it.
User avatar
Flaming Mo
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 23,334
And1: 225
Joined: Jan 30, 2002
Location: Germany
     

 

Post#11 » by Flaming Mo » Thu Nov 22, 2007 9:12 am

Bleeding Green wrote:Why?

Cabrera is in the midst of a hall of fame career and he's likely not even hit his prime yet.


And he would be the perfect replacement for Manny in the future...
Hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies...
GregB
RealGM
Posts: 11,923
And1: 2,999
Joined: Sep 21, 2004
Location: South Shore, MA
     

 

Post#12 » by GregB » Thu Nov 22, 2007 3:16 pm

Flash3 wrote:
We have enough starting pitching depth to live without Bucholz.
No team has enough starting pitching, ever. The more the merrier.


True, But a slugger like Cabrera is as hard or even harder to find. Thats why giving up Bucholz is ok with me. We have a lot of good minor league pitching working its way up the pipeline.
User avatar
Chach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,330
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 23, 2003

 

Post#13 » by Chach » Thu Nov 22, 2007 6:33 pm

There is a difference between trading good pitching prospects and the top pitching prospect in baseball who has really no arm trouble in his entire career. He had an issue with fatigue that forced him to be shut down but that isn't a structural problem. Just like the Yankees won't trade Hughes or Joba, we aren't going to move Buchholz. If you have a pitcher in the high minors, and in this case major league ready, who is a stud pitcher then you don't trade him for anyone. If he's in A ball, maybe on his way to AA then you can pull the trigger because a lot can happen but when he has shown the ability to pitch in the bigs, he doesn't go anywhere. Not even for Santana. mahalo
~Chach~

Return to Boston Red Sox