nate33 wrote: scoring 14 points in the second half,
Actually it was 21 in the second half lol. He didn't score in the first half.
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
nate33 wrote: scoring 14 points in the second half,

tontoz wrote:nate33 wrote: scoring 14 points in the second half,
Actually it was 21 in the second half lol. He didn't score in the first half.
nate33 wrote:tontoz wrote:nate33 wrote: scoring 14 points in the second half,
Actually it was 21 in the second half lol. He didn't score in the first half.
I thought is 21 total and 14 in the second half.
pancakes3 wrote:pulling this out of my butt but college offenses are more rote and easier to game. from all that i've seen, Sheppard's mostly jumping passing lanes, not a lot of his steals are quick hands and/or ripping it out of a defender's dribble, which Reese Beekman actually does at least once a game.
the defensive IQ is definitely a bonus, but idk if he's going to be CP3/Stockton when it comes to steals in the NBA. His plus plus skill is obviously shooting; he can easily be a 45%+ 3p shooter in the league. With serviceable handles, passing, and other Tyus-Jonesian skills, I think he grades out as a top 15 PG in the league with best case scenario, Dame or even better (Dame with better shooting).

nate33 wrote:Rafael122 wrote:Sheppard screams hustle guy, like a Grayson Allen type. I'm not taking him top 5.
He is way more skilled than Grayson Allen. Whenever he is given the chance, he runs PG for that squad and does a good job. Two games ago, they took away his 3-point ball so he roasted them by penetrating to the rim, scoring 14 points in the second half, all at the rim, off of a bunch of nice hesitation dribbles in isolation coverage.
It may well be that he is too small to be a highly successful pro, but it's not because he isn't skilled. He is a very good playmaker and one of the best shooters in college basketball history. He is way more than a "hustle player". He isn't Steve Wojciechowski
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.

pancakes3 wrote:pulling this out of my butt but college offenses are more rote and easier to game. from all that i've seen, Sheppard's mostly jumping passing lanes, not a lot of his steals are quick hands and/or ripping it out of a defender's dribble, which Reese Beekman actually does at least once a game.

Rafael122 wrote:nate33 wrote:Rafael122 wrote:Sheppard screams hustle guy, like a Grayson Allen type. I'm not taking him top 5.
He is way more skilled than Grayson Allen. Whenever he is given the chance, he runs PG for that squad and does a good job. Two games ago, they took away his 3-point ball so he roasted them by penetrating to the rim, scoring 14 points in the second half, all at the rim, off of a bunch of nice hesitation dribbles in isolation coverage.
It may well be that he is too small to be a highly successful pro, but it's not because he isn't skilled. He is a very good playmaker and one of the best shooters in college basketball history. He is way more than a "hustle player". He isn't Steve Wojciechowski
This is a guy Tommy Sheppard would have picked. He's a safe pick, if he were around with our other 1st round pick, sure, take him. He's not going to be there but taking him top 5 is a huge risk.

Dark Faze wrote:Is there not a consensus #1 prospect in this draft?
nate33 wrote:Dark Faze wrote:Is there not a consensus #1 prospect in this draft?
Not at all.
Most mock drafts have Sarr as the #1 guy by default because hyper athletic bigs are so rare, but nobody thinks Sarr is a can't miss prospect.
There are 5 or 6 guys that most would consider to be fairly typical top 10 talents in a normal draft, but there is no guy that would be a sure-fire top 3 talent in a typical draft.

NatP4 wrote:Yeah, he looked good. I think Buzelis is legit. In the 2nd half of the year he’s been much better. Shooting 52% from the field and 38.5% from 3. Racks up the steals and blocks, rebounds like a 4.
He’s playing on a team with zero guard play. No coaching, and a handful of self-centered teammates. Awful situation.
Still such a talented player. One of the only 1st overall type talents in the draft. Wagner/Avdija mold with even more upside.
nate33 wrote:NatP4 wrote:Yeah, he looked good. I think Buzelis is legit. In the 2nd half of the year he’s been much better. Shooting 52% from the field and 38.5% from 3. Racks up the steals and blocks, rebounds like a 4.
He’s playing on a team with zero guard play. No coaching, and a handful of self-centered teammates. Awful situation.
Still such a talented player. One of the only 1st overall type talents in the draft. Wagner/Avdija mold with even more upside.
How do you rank Cody Williams, Buzelis and Risacher?