Lowest reasonable all-time ranking for Shaq?

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

SinceGatlingWasARookie
RealGM
Posts: 11,712
And1: 2,759
Joined: Aug 25, 2005
Location: Northern California

Re: Lowest reasonable all-time ranking for Shaq? 

Post#41 » by SinceGatlingWasARookie » Fri Feb 23, 2024 7:26 pm

70sFan wrote:
SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:I watched some of a random 1984 playoffs Celtics vs Knicks game last night. In that small random sample the Knicks had King defending Bird and King played great defense and sort of looked like Kawhi playing defense.

So, here is game 7 of the series:



0:10 - solid off-ball defense on Bird, lacked length to bother Bird jumpshot but good effort
7:19 - easily beaten in the post by Bird
8:42 - blown by Bird, but great recovery and block for behind
13:12 - outmuscled by Bird on the boards, foul on Bird
13:40 - bitten on a pumpfake, foul on Bird
28:15 - no closeout on Bird in transition
30:10 - off-ball miscommunication leading to open dunk inside
36:50 - missed Bird off-ball, leading to open jumpshot made
40:10 - regular contest on Bird jumpshot, Larry with a rare airball
44:23 - lost Bird off-ball completely, Larry missed open jumpshot
45:00 - horrible post defense on an off-ball cut, open layup by Bird
46:20 - missed Bird off-ball for a moment, then blown by on a closeout but Bird turned the ball over in a trap
53:21 - prevented from baseline attack in the high post, then Bird passed out of double
57:10 - Bird doubled in the high post, leading to a basket
58:15 - Bird doubled in the post again, leading to a basket
59:15 - sagged off Bird to prevent from entry pass, bad choice - Bird made open three
59:48 - nice steal from behind against McHale
1:01:30 - decent post defense
1:05:20 - illegal defense on King
1:09:28 - poor closeout on a trap scheme, then he had no idea who was left to guard
1:11:00 - bad perimeter defense on Wedman
1:12:55 - solid effort in trapping scheme
1:16:35 - wrong rotation left Ainge open

From then, Knicks basically tried desperately to steal the ball from Boston, so I won't go further.

It's not an all-time bad defensive performance by any means, but I don't see any "Kawhi" in him here. He had two nice plays on Bird, but most of the time he was overmatched with Bird's size and he didn't do a well job off-ball on Bird (thankfully for him, Bird didn't move much without the ball in that game). On top of that, he didn't exist as a help defender either.

Maybe I am watching the wrong game, but it's game 7 of the ECSF - is there a better moment to play the best defense of his life?

No the 1984 Knicks did not have particularly good defenders. Cartwright had lost his mobility due to injury and was still not that expeirienced. Truck was old. Tucker was slightly better than average on defense. Sparrow was a good but not great defender.

Backing them up Ray Williams still had his speed but cocaine had turned his mind and game to mush. Loui Orr was not horrible but was a below average defender. Injury had changed a once very good defender in Marvin Webster into just a slightly better than average defender.

Guys who barely played. Walker would become a great defender but this is rookie Walker. Grunfeld was not a could defender.

There is nobody on that 1984 playoff Knick team that I can clearly say was a better defender than King. The sample I watched was large enough to show that 1984 King had the tools to be a great defender.

The Knicks were the best defensive team in the league in 1983/84, they were 3rd the season before as well. Of course, they were also coached by Hubie. It's silly to think that they didn't have a good defensive roster.

The Bernard King in your mind is not 1984 playoffs King. You must have physically broken from injury Bullets King and young inexperienced cocaine using King who was demoralized as a defender by playing on teams where nobody played defense.

I don't need to have anyone "in mind", when I want to see how player plays, I simply watch his games.
I'm afraid that it's you who have a mythologized version of King in mind. King was an all-time great scorer and very solid all-nba guy at his peak. He wasn't a good defender, rebounder or playmaker. Scoring was the only thing he did at above average level, that's not top 10 peak ever level guy.


This video contains content from the Orchard Entertainment ….. that can not be played in your country. I can get game 7 video that can be played in my country USA. It seems you either are not in the USA, are using a foreign VPN or are subscribed to whoever owns the video.

Bird creates problems. You must stop Bird’s dribble or Bird will kill you as a passer. The slower power forwards can not stop Bird’s dribble but quick people like Michael Cooper, Paul Pressey or Bernard King can stop Bird’s dribble but Bird can shoot over them and Bird is too strong for them. Putting speed on Bird that will be over-powered by Bird is not as bad of a choice as putting big strong guys on Bird that can’t stop Bird’s dribble thereby allowing Bird to wander arround in the paint with a live dribble knowing that Bird will eventually find the right open angle for a good shot or a good pass.

Most teams put their best defender on Bird which tells me the Knicks think King is their best defender at forward. You could take Truck out and let Grunfeld or Orr guard Bird. Old Truck can’t guard Maxwell or McHale anyway and isn’t such a good scorer that you can’t afford to lose his scoring. Orr and Grunfeld can afford to foul out so they can hack Bird. Orr is kind of tall and kind of fast but not a smart experienced defender. When Orr was in the game vs Bird and Maxwell Orr took Maxwell leaving King on Bird.

I think I was watching the 1st quarter of game 3. King looked like a very good defender. It was the game in which due to injury Dennis Johnson did not play in the 1st quarter but Dennis Johnson was dressed in uniform.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,786
And1: 25,107
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Lowest reasonable all-time ranking for Shaq? 

Post#42 » by 70sFan » Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:40 pm

SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:
70sFan wrote:
SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:I watched some of a random 1984 playoffs Celtics vs Knicks game last night. In that small random sample the Knicks had King defending Bird and King played great defense and sort of looked like Kawhi playing defense.

So, here is game 7 of the series:



0:10 - solid off-ball defense on Bird, lacked length to bother Bird jumpshot but good effort
7:19 - easily beaten in the post by Bird
8:42 - blown by Bird, but great recovery and block for behind
13:12 - outmuscled by Bird on the boards, foul on Bird
13:40 - bitten on a pumpfake, foul on Bird
28:15 - no closeout on Bird in transition
30:10 - off-ball miscommunication leading to open dunk inside
36:50 - missed Bird off-ball, leading to open jumpshot made
40:10 - regular contest on Bird jumpshot, Larry with a rare airball
44:23 - lost Bird off-ball completely, Larry missed open jumpshot
45:00 - horrible post defense on an off-ball cut, open layup by Bird
46:20 - missed Bird off-ball for a moment, then blown by on a closeout but Bird turned the ball over in a trap
53:21 - prevented from baseline attack in the high post, then Bird passed out of double
57:10 - Bird doubled in the high post, leading to a basket
58:15 - Bird doubled in the post again, leading to a basket
59:15 - sagged off Bird to prevent from entry pass, bad choice - Bird made open three
59:48 - nice steal from behind against McHale
1:01:30 - decent post defense
1:05:20 - illegal defense on King
1:09:28 - poor closeout on a trap scheme, then he had no idea who was left to guard
1:11:00 - bad perimeter defense on Wedman
1:12:55 - solid effort in trapping scheme
1:16:35 - wrong rotation left Ainge open

From then, Knicks basically tried desperately to steal the ball from Boston, so I won't go further.

It's not an all-time bad defensive performance by any means, but I don't see any "Kawhi" in him here. He had two nice plays on Bird, but most of the time he was overmatched with Bird's size and he didn't do a well job off-ball on Bird (thankfully for him, Bird didn't move much without the ball in that game). On top of that, he didn't exist as a help defender either.

Maybe I am watching the wrong game, but it's game 7 of the ECSF - is there a better moment to play the best defense of his life?

No the 1984 Knicks did not have particularly good defenders. Cartwright had lost his mobility due to injury and was still not that expeirienced. Truck was old. Tucker was slightly better than average on defense. Sparrow was a good but not great defender.

Backing them up Ray Williams still had his speed but cocaine had turned his mind and game to mush. Loui Orr was not horrible but was a below average defender. Injury had changed a once very good defender in Marvin Webster into just a slightly better than average defender.

Guys who barely played. Walker would become a great defender but this is rookie Walker. Grunfeld was not a could defender.

There is nobody on that 1984 playoff Knick team that I can clearly say was a better defender than King. The sample I watched was large enough to show that 1984 King had the tools to be a great defender.

The Knicks were the best defensive team in the league in 1983/84, they were 3rd the season before as well. Of course, they were also coached by Hubie. It's silly to think that they didn't have a good defensive roster.

The Bernard King in your mind is not 1984 playoffs King. You must have physically broken from injury Bullets King and young inexperienced cocaine using King who was demoralized as a defender by playing on teams where nobody played defense.

I don't need to have anyone "in mind", when I want to see how player plays, I simply watch his games.
I'm afraid that it's you who have a mythologized version of King in mind. King was an all-time great scorer and very solid all-nba guy at his peak. He wasn't a good defender, rebounder or playmaker. Scoring was the only thing he did at above average level, that's not top 10 peak ever level guy.


This video contains content from the Orchard Entertainment ….. that can not be played in your country. I can get game 7 video that can be played in my country USA. It seems you either are not in the USA, are using a foreign VPN or are subscribed to whoever owns the video.

Bird creates problems. You must stop Bird’s dribble or Bird will kill you as a passer. The slower power forwards can not stop Bird’s dribble but quick people like Michael Cooper, Paul Pressey or Bernard King can stop Bird’s dribble but Bird can shoot over them and Bird is too strong for them. Putting speed on Bird that will be over-powered by Bird is not as bad of a choice as putting big strong guys on Bird that can’t stop Bird’s dribble thereby allowing Bird to wander arround in the paint with a live dribble knowing that Bird will eventually find the right open angle for a good shot or a good pass.

Most teams put their best defender on Bird which tells me the Knicks think King is their best defender at forward. You could take Truck out and let Grunfeld or Orr guard Bird. Old Truck can’t guard Maxwell or McHale anyway and isn’t such a good scorer that you can’t afford to lose his scoring. Orr and Grunfeld can afford to foul out so they can hack Bird. Orr is kind of tall and kind of fast but not a smart experienced defender. When Orr was in the game vs Bird and Maxwell Orr took Maxwell leaving King on Bird.

I think I was watching the 1st quarter of game 3. King looked like a very good defender. It was the game in which due to injury Dennis Johnson did not play in the 1st quarter but Dennis Johnson was dressed in uniform.

I am not from America, probably that is why.

I mean, provide any evidence of King playing Kawhi-like defense. Send the clip. It's not like I never watched King before, he's nothing special as a defender and you are comparing him to one of the best perimeter defenders ever.
User avatar
flaco
Analyst
Posts: 3,124
And1: 1,082
Joined: Apr 27, 2020

Re: Lowest reasonable all-time ranking for Shaq? 

Post#43 » by flaco » Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:47 pm

I have 9 players ahead of Shaq (in chronological order):

  • Russell
  • Wilt
  • Oscar
  • Kareem
  • Bird
  • Magic
  • MJ
  • Duncan
  • LeBron

I then have 5 players in the same tier, including Shaq:

  • Hakeem
  • Shaq
  • Durant
  • Steph
  • Jokic

Worst case scenario I'd say #14. Best case #10.
SinceGatlingWasARookie
RealGM
Posts: 11,712
And1: 2,759
Joined: Aug 25, 2005
Location: Northern California

Re: Lowest reasonable all-time ranking for Shaq? 

Post#44 » by SinceGatlingWasARookie » Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:57 pm

70sFan wrote:
SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:
70sFan wrote:So, here is game 7 of the series:



0:10 - solid off-ball defense on Bird, lacked length to bother Bird jumpshot but good effort
7:19 - easily beaten in the post by Bird
8:42 - blown by Bird, but great recovery and block for behind
13:12 - outmuscled by Bird on the boards, foul on Bird
13:40 - bitten on a pumpfake, foul on Bird
28:15 - no closeout on Bird in transition
30:10 - off-ball miscommunication leading to open dunk inside
36:50 - missed Bird off-ball, leading to open jumpshot made
40:10 - regular contest on Bird jumpshot, Larry with a rare airball
44:23 - lost Bird off-ball completely, Larry missed open jumpshot
45:00 - horrible post defense on an off-ball cut, open layup by Bird
46:20 - missed Bird off-ball for a moment, then blown by on a closeout but Bird turned the ball over in a trap
53:21 - prevented from baseline attack in the high post, then Bird passed out of double
57:10 - Bird doubled in the high post, leading to a basket
58:15 - Bird doubled in the post again, leading to a basket
59:15 - sagged off Bird to prevent from entry pass, bad choice - Bird made open three
59:48 - nice steal from behind against McHale
1:01:30 - decent post defense
1:05:20 - illegal defense on King
1:09:28 - poor closeout on a trap scheme, then he had no idea who was left to guard
1:11:00 - bad perimeter defense on Wedman
1:12:55 - solid effort in trapping scheme
1:16:35 - wrong rotation left Ainge open

From then, Knicks basically tried desperately to steal the ball from Boston, so I won't go further.

It's not an all-time bad defensive performance by any means, but I don't see any "Kawhi" in him here. He had two nice plays on Bird, but most of the time he was overmatched with Bird's size and he didn't do a well job off-ball on Bird (thankfully for him, Bird didn't move much without the ball in that game). On top of that, he didn't exist as a help defender either.

Maybe I am watching the wrong game, but it's game 7 of the ECSF - is there a better moment to play the best defense of his life?


The Knicks were the best defensive team in the league in 1983/84, they were 3rd the season before as well. Of course, they were also coached by Hubie. It's silly to think that they didn't have a good defensive roster.


I don't need to have anyone "in mind", when I want to see how player plays, I simply watch his games.
I'm afraid that it's you who have a mythologized version of King in mind. King was an all-time great scorer and very solid all-nba guy at his peak. He wasn't a good defender, rebounder or playmaker. Scoring was the only thing he did at above average level, that's not top 10 peak ever level guy.


This video contains content from the Orchard Entertainment ….. that can not be played in your country. I can get game 7 video that can be played in my country USA. It seems you either are not in the USA, are using a foreign VPN or are subscribed to whoever owns the video.

Bird creates problems. You must stop Bird’s dribble or Bird will kill you as a passer. The slower power forwards can not stop Bird’s dribble but quick people like Michael Cooper, Paul Pressey or Bernard King can stop Bird’s dribble but Bird can shoot over them and Bird is too strong for them. Putting speed on Bird that will be over-powered by Bird is not as bad of a choice as putting big strong guys on Bird that can’t stop Bird’s dribble thereby allowing Bird to wander arround in the paint with a live dribble knowing that Bird will eventually find the right open angle for a good shot or a good pass.

Most teams put their best defender on Bird which tells me the Knicks think King is their best defender at forward. You could take Truck out and let Grunfeld or Orr guard Bird. Old Truck can’t guard Maxwell or McHale anyway and isn’t such a good scorer that you can’t afford to lose his scoring. Orr and Grunfeld can afford to foul out so they can hack Bird. Orr is kind of tall and kind of fast but not a smart experienced defender. When Orr was in the game vs Bird and Maxwell Orr took Maxwell leaving King on Bird.

I think I was watching the 1st quarter of game 3. King looked like a very good defender. It was the game in which due to injury Dennis Johnson did not play in the 1st quarter but Dennis Johnson was dressed in uniform.

I am not from America, probably that is why.

I mean, provide any evidence of King playing Kawhi-like defense. Send the clip. It's not like I never watched King before, he's nothing special as a defender and you are comparing him to one of the best perimeter defenders ever.

I was wrong about the game I watched. It was 1st quarter of game 6 not 1st quarter of game 3.

Watch that 1st quarter of game 6 and tell me that King’s defense did not look very good.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,786
And1: 25,107
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Lowest reasonable all-time ranking for Shaq? 

Post#45 » by 70sFan » Fri Feb 23, 2024 9:49 pm

SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:
70sFan wrote:
SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:
This video contains content from the Orchard Entertainment ….. that can not be played in your country. I can get game 7 video that can be played in my country USA. It seems you either are not in the USA, are using a foreign VPN or are subscribed to whoever owns the video.

Bird creates problems. You must stop Bird’s dribble or Bird will kill you as a passer. The slower power forwards can not stop Bird’s dribble but quick people like Michael Cooper, Paul Pressey or Bernard King can stop Bird’s dribble but Bird can shoot over them and Bird is too strong for them. Putting speed on Bird that will be over-powered by Bird is not as bad of a choice as putting big strong guys on Bird that can’t stop Bird’s dribble thereby allowing Bird to wander arround in the paint with a live dribble knowing that Bird will eventually find the right open angle for a good shot or a good pass.

Most teams put their best defender on Bird which tells me the Knicks think King is their best defender at forward. You could take Truck out and let Grunfeld or Orr guard Bird. Old Truck can’t guard Maxwell or McHale anyway and isn’t such a good scorer that you can’t afford to lose his scoring. Orr and Grunfeld can afford to foul out so they can hack Bird. Orr is kind of tall and kind of fast but not a smart experienced defender. When Orr was in the game vs Bird and Maxwell Orr took Maxwell leaving King on Bird.

I think I was watching the 1st quarter of game 3. King looked like a very good defender. It was the game in which due to injury Dennis Johnson did not play in the 1st quarter but Dennis Johnson was dressed in uniform.

I am not from America, probably that is why.

I mean, provide any evidence of King playing Kawhi-like defense. Send the clip. It's not like I never watched King before, he's nothing special as a defender and you are comparing him to one of the best perimeter defenders ever.

I was wrong about the game I watched. It was 1st quarter of game 6 not 1st quarter of game 3.

Watch that 1st quarter of game 6 and tell me that King’s defense did not look very good.

I will and then will come back with my thoughts.

What are your thoughts about King stopping being Kawhi in game 7?
f4p
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,695
And1: 1,726
Joined: Sep 19, 2021
 

Re: Lowest reasonable all-time ranking for Shaq? 

Post#46 » by f4p » Fri Feb 23, 2024 11:12 pm

OhayoKD wrote:
f4p wrote:
OhayoKD wrote:Feel like this is a good time to remind everyone it was the 2000 Lakers, and not the 2003 Spurs, that played signifcantly worse in the playoffs due to their centerpiece's biggest weaknesses being exploited.

2001 Lakers of course had a certain Kobe Bryant outscoring, assisting, on/offing, and out-ball handling, while playing more minutes when the Lakers weant on their tear.


ok, but are we really trying to argue 2001 shaq wasn't massively impactful?

Who is "we". Why are we manufacturing some strawman about "massively impactful" in a comparison to Tim Duncan. Why is Duncan nowhere in this reply to a post specifically comparing Duncan and Shaq?


i mean it's a general shaq thread and you've brought up these 2000/01 points before to say 2000/01 shaq wasn't as great a peak as people think, irrespective of duncan.

just on the face of it, we have a guy averaging 30/15 while playing 88% of the minutes for the most dominant playoff team ever. by that alone, we know he was ridiculous. yes, his on/off looks weak

The point wasn't "take the on/off at face value", it was "Kobe has a case as the Lakers best performer in that run and the Lakers did the opposite of rising in the playoffs the previous year when Kobe didn't go off". If you want to push 2001 Shaq as a top peak anyway, cool, but people tend to want 2000 for the 67-win regular season and MVP. Duncan put team-level playoff elevation and an all-time regular season together, Shaq didn't.


well, yeah, kobe playing so far above any level he had ever played at (or would again for many years) is going to result in great things. shaq and kobe simultaneously being all-time is how they got the best playoff run ever.

Also not sure why on/off(listed with a bunch of other points) is getting this much focus while you don't comment at all on anything else.


because it seemed to be the way you were considering 2001 shaq as not amazingly impactful.

Steph was "massively impactful" on the 2017 Warriors, yet with Durant merely doing the scoring part better for one playoff series, you were asking if he was really their best player and how much stock we can put into 2017 when praising Steph Curry's playoff translation.


well, durant also led the warriors in +/- in the 2018 playoffs and had better overall playoff numbers and better finals numbers in both the 2017 and 2018 playoffs compared to steph. it's not like there's just one tiny data point. as for steph, don't we all mostly agree he's not the best at playoff translation? before 2022, he had 1 playoffs where his numbers didn't fall off pretty hard, and it was the cruisest, lowest-pressure playoffs just about anyone will ever face.

Kobe has a much stronger case than KD does for outplaying Shaq, but instead of asking the questions you would ask of anyone else, we're putting all our chips on conveniently selected on/off while completely ignoring RAPM, the 2001 regular season, the Lakers rim-protection numbers, minute distribution, Kobe Bryant, co-star synergy, and the Lakers getting worse in the season people actually want to use so we can pretend Shaq's impact profile is as impressive as Duncan's...


i don't know what the kobe part has to do with this. kobe can be very good while shaq is also very good. just like david robinson can have a +35 on/off while duncan has a negative on/off in 1999 and duncan was still a good player.

also, excepting shaq's -0.3 in 2001, where the entirety of the lakers playoff +18 without shaq comes from the 4th quarters of games 3 and 4 against the spurs where the lakers went +18 in 18 minutes without shaq (and kobe) against a spurs team that clearly lost the will to live, we have shaq racking up +12 to +25 playoffs for the first 8 years of databall, and 2001 would be +14 without those garbage time 4th quarters (which shows how easily these numbers can get flipped in one season). duncan was negative for 4 of his first 7 playoffs, 8 of his 18 playoffs overall, and 3 of his 5 championships, so i don't see why someone would be wrong to say shaq was better, at least in his 1994-2004 run. it certainly doesn't seem to be an easy case in duncan's favor.

but that seems to be a small sample size in an ocean of other data. for example, shaq has a +22.9 on/off in 2000 and an identical +22.9 on/off in 2002. so the -0.3 in 2001 would appear to be quite fluky, especially dealing with a guy who was not playing only 5 minutes per game. it also means i'm not sure how 2000 shaq isn't ridiculously impactful if we're using on/off to hold him back in 2001. does it really matter if the lakers defense got worse if shaq is +22.9?

So it's not fluky in 2000, is fluky in 2001, and not fluky again in 2002?


and 1997, 1998, 1999, 2003, and 2004. the 1 year in the middle of the 7 double digit years (3 over 20), where the 1 negative is part of the greatest playoff team ever (so it's not like we can conclude shaq wasn't playing well), would seem to be the outlier.

You're right, we shouldn't put too much stock in 5 minutes a game, the problem is you specifically decide the stock is worth keeping when it makes him look...similar to the players you think peaked lower, and discard it if it is inconvenient for "Shaq was a big playoff riser!"


if it happens over and over and over and the overall sample ends at +17.2, then yeah i think we can use it. lebron has a stretch in his career where he went +23, -15, +23, +0, the last 2 being championships. what to make of such crazy fluctuations for such a high minutes guy is difficult to say. but the overall career tells the story.

along with a bunch of other points(again, there were 3 other things I mentioned for Kobe) so you can transpose 2001 Shaq's team results onto 2000 Shaq's on/off.


is this about kobe or duncan? i'm in a shaq thread saying there's no real room to downplay 2000 or 2001 shaq.

It's not that their defense fell off, it's that they went from, by the regular-season, projecting as one of the best title-teams ever to one of the weakest title teams ever despite a big boost in minutes for a Kobe Bryant whose per-rate scoring and creation did not dip. Moreover, we can identify why that defense fell off and it just so happens to be the part of the Laker's defense Shaq had the most involvement in.


ok, but that feels like picking nits. the most dominant player in the regular season dominated the playoffs, averaging 30/15, while his team won the title and he destroyed a fairly good frontline in the finals, averaging 38/17.


and of course, from 1997 to 2004, shaq posts a KG-esque +17.7 on/off in the playoffs, with double digits in every year but 2001. all evidence says we're dealing with an impact titan.

Cool. Duncan is a bigger one. What is your point?


not by on/off at least. shaq is +11.7 career in the playoffs to +7.5 for duncan. shaq has an 8 year stretch of +17 while duncan has a 6 year stretch at +14.6 is the best i can see.

so did kobe bryant and the 7 dwarves create the most dominant team ever? seems unlikely, given what we know about the rest of kobe's career. did the other 6 guys all play at shaq's level for a postseason? seems unlikely. would the most dominant playoff team ever have done just as well whether shaq played or not? obviously you wouldn't argue that. so what happened? maybe the lakers were just a buzz saw that, instead of falling apart every time shaq wasn't on the floor, had a magical postseason where they even held up during in his 5 minutes off the court.

Yep. It was that. Not Kobe's scoring and playmaking skyrocketing. Crazy how the literal minutes leader was not an influence on how his team performed.


my paragraph discussed why it's unlikely shaq wasn't amazing impactful (with a breakdown of where the garbage time minutes skewed the numbers), not why kobe bryant wasn't also extremely good.
SinceGatlingWasARookie
RealGM
Posts: 11,712
And1: 2,759
Joined: Aug 25, 2005
Location: Northern California

Re: Lowest reasonable all-time ranking for Shaq? 

Post#47 » by SinceGatlingWasARookie » Sat Feb 24, 2024 12:20 am

70sFan wrote:
SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:
70sFan wrote:I am not from America, probably that is why.

I mean, provide any evidence of King playing Kawhi-like defense. Send the clip. It's not like I never watched King before, he's nothing special as a defender and you are comparing him to one of the best perimeter defenders ever.

I was wrong about the game I watched. It was 1st quarter of game 6 not 1st quarter of game 3.

Watch that 1st quarter of game 6 and tell me that King’s defense did not look very good.

I will and then will come back with my thoughts.

What are your thoughts about King stopping being Kawhi in game 7?


I will have to watch game 7. If King did not defend well for bad teams he might also not defend well in lost causes like being down 20 to a good team playing it’s A game.

My memory says-the Knicks had already overachieved and did not have the energy to do the impossible again in game 7.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,786
And1: 25,107
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Lowest reasonable all-time ranking for Shaq? 

Post#48 » by 70sFan » Wed Feb 28, 2024 12:35 pm

SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:I was wrong about the game I watched. It was 1st quarter of game 6 not 1st quarter of game 3.

Watch that 1st quarter of game 6 and tell me that King’s defense did not look very good.

Here is game 6 of the series (I really hate this camera angle):



5:20 - King steals entry pass to Bird from the post, good defense
5:46 - Bird misses fadeaway from the post, solid contest from King
6:55 - Bird establishes deep position against King and makes turnaround jumpshot without contest
7:30 - Bird is doubled, finds open teammate
8:53 - King misses Bird on an off-ball screen, Bird makes wide open jumpshot
9:11 - Bird misses uncontested jumpshot in semi-transition
16:54 - Bird bites King on a pumpfake, but takes no advantage because help comes
19:00 - Bird makes fadeaway jumpshot over King, King tries to contest it well, but is too short to bother Bird's release
19:23 - Bird is doubled again, then he reposts and misses softly contested jumpshot, King is physical in this possession
25:05 - King dies on a screen again, but this time Bird decides to pass it to McHale

That's the end of the 1st quarter. Again, this is a solid quarter from King and he had 1 or 2 good plays on Bird, but most of the time he did nothing special here and he provides no help defense again. I will continue to watch the rest of the game later.
canada_dry
General Manager
Posts: 8,913
And1: 7,017
Joined: Aug 22, 2017

Re: Lowest reasonable all-time ranking for Shaq? 

Post#49 » by canada_dry » Thu Mar 7, 2024 2:06 am

12

Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app

Return to Player Comparisons