RookieStar wrote:OrlChamps2030 wrote:drsd wrote:
And-1
THe reality is that Suggs as the "PG" and G-Harris as the SG works. Because shooting efficiencies improves.
This is a shooters' league and teams need flamethrowers more than board-crashers at the guard slots. That's F-Wagner's and Banchero's job.
As an aside, when the Magic get a PG that can run the PnR as 40% of all plays, and not drive to the hoop, added to a SG that can shoot, this team will be special.
So: I for one would love to see Suggs at the PG and not the "PG" to see if he can run the PnR effectively. Management needs to know the answer to this question.
If the FO decides to acquire a SG instead of a true PG this offseason.. Monk could be a great fit next to Suggs
Or Grayson Allen...
Most of normal PGs also can shoot, so i would prefer actual PG.
Gary Harris data is funny but does not really tell whole story, among 7 or 8 wins we had in 9 games, 5 were against teams well below .500 record.