Coco Costanza wrote:Good news: Pacers lost
Bad news: So did Grizzlies
Pascal -43 in 20 minutes!

Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
Coco Costanza wrote:Good news: Pacers lost
Bad news: So did Grizzlies
Shakril wrote:Tha Cynic wrote:Duffman100 wrote:Game was winnable if quickly and Trent didn’t suck
Nice to see Dick continue to score in different ways
Outside of Barnes the rest of the team is pretty limited, so they weren't winning this. Everyone else is a role player who plays off Barnes
This comment is blatantly false.
IQ, RJ both can create for themselves and others.
Poeltl and Dick have their own strenghts on offense.
With Darko's Ball sharing, the system itself creates opportunities.
We did not lose cause Barnes was hurt, we did lose cause we made avoidable mistakes.
mdenny wrote:nestea wrote:Tha Cynic wrote:
We need guys to Shoot well and defend like crazy. It's their only chance to win.
GTJ was missing everything and Quickley isn't comfortable taking contested shots.
Gradey Dick is the only guy who can score on the move, but this team has no one who can create outside of Barnes.
Barrett is a one trick pony.
Poeltl doesn't know how to use glass.
Brown thinks he's Damian Lillard.
Olynyk looks like he thinks he's more than he is.
Things need to settle down lol.
I just pray that draft pick miraculously becomes something even though general consensus is that we'll end up with another role player even with a high draft pick..
Love reading positive posts from experts like this.
It all makes sense when you realize he is a pensare/messiah devotee. What does "scoring on the move" mean?
Loso04 wrote:Coco Costanza wrote:Good news: Pacers lost
Bad news: So did Grizzlies
Pascal -43 in 20 minutes!
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
Tha Cynic wrote:mdenny wrote:nestea wrote:
Love reading positive posts from experts like this.
It all makes sense when you realize he is a pensare/messiah devotee. What does "scoring on the move" mean?
What are you going on about? Do you just go around making up stuff for no reason?![]()
I've seen like one 5 minute clip of pensare all my life (because guys like you being him up all the time), and absolutely hated Bargnani who Messiah loved. You're the only one on here who talks about that guy. Pensare is basically the Barnes version of what you are with FVV from what I see posted here, so you two have a lot in common, which is why you probably mention him a lot.
Tha Cynic wrote:mdenny wrote:nestea wrote:
Love reading positive posts from experts like this.
It all makes sense when you realize he is a pensare/messiah devotee. What does "scoring on the move" mean?
What are you going on about? Do you just go around making up stuff for no reason?![]()
I've seen like one 5 minute clip of pensare all my life (because guys like you being him up all the time), and absolutely hated Bargnani who Messiah loved. You're the only one on here who talks about that guy. Pensare is basically the Barnes version of what you are with FVV from what I see posted here, so you two have a lot in common, which is why you probably mention him a lot.
mdenny wrote:Tha Cynic wrote:mdenny wrote:
It all makes sense when you realize he is a pensare/messiah devotee. What does "scoring on the move" mean?
What are you going on about? Do you just go around making up stuff for no reason?![]()
I've seen like one 5 minute clip of pensare all my life (because guys like you being him up all the time), and absolutely hated Bargnani who Messiah loved. You're the only one on here who talks about that guy. Pensare is basically the Barnes version of what you are with FVV from what I see posted here, so you two have a lot in common, which is why you probably mention him a lot.
It's hilarious to watch you pretend to know what you are talking about. "Scoring on the move" lol.
Tha Cynic wrote:mdenny wrote:Tha Cynic wrote:
What are you going on about? Do you just go around making up stuff for no reason?![]()
I've seen like one 5 minute clip of pensare all my life (because guys like you being him up all the time), and absolutely hated Bargnani who Messiah loved. You're the only one on here who talks about that guy. Pensare is basically the Barnes version of what you are with FVV from what I see posted here, so you two have a lot in common, which is why you probably mention him a lot.
It's hilarious to watch you pretend to know what you are talking about. "Scoring on the move" lol.
Scoring on the move can't be that hard of a concept to understand, can it? Or are you just playing dumb? What are we in, biology class?![]()
Sorry, I don't sit around watching guys like pensare like you, I just watch and play basketball.
mdenny wrote:Tha Cynic wrote:mdenny wrote:
It's hilarious to watch you pretend to know what you are talking about. "Scoring on the move" lol.
Scoring on the move can't be that hard of a concept to understand, can it? Or are you just playing dumb? What are we in, biology class?![]()
Sorry, I don't sit around watching guys like pensare like you, I just watch and play basketball.
If it's not a hard concept please enlighten us. What is "scoring on the move" and why is Dick the only one capable of it.
Tha Cynic wrote:Shakril wrote:Tha Cynic wrote:
Outside of Barnes the rest of the team is pretty limited, so they weren't winning this. Everyone else is a role player who plays off Barnes
This comment is blatantly false.
IQ, RJ both can create for themselves and others.
Poeltl and Dick have their own strenghts on offense.
With Darko's Ball sharing, the system itself creates opportunities.
We did not lose cause Barnes was hurt, we did lose cause we made avoidable mistakes.
No, they can't create. RJ on some of his drives can kick it out more, but he works as a 3rd or 4th option. He's not a guy who's good as a featured option because he is very limited and relies on being able to get to the rim or having wide open 3s.
Quickley is best used as an offball scorer. He can potentially create for others and that's what they're trying to develop him into.
Their best options today is DHOs and pick and rolls but even in those pick and rolls Quickley is going to have to be much better as a scorer off their picks to really shift the defense. He's very slow and hesitant off those. We're going to see a lot of Poeltl and Olynyk in the high post creating. The offense is clunky off that though because our guards are very slow to release. Dick needs to be featured in this more.
I think you guys overrated RJ we a scorer do much. I like what he's doing here but he's not what some of you think he is. He's only good at one thing and he has a toooon of work to do and a lot of him will require him to completely overhaul his form.
Scase wrote:Tha Cynic wrote:Shakril wrote:
This comment is blatantly false.
IQ, RJ both can create for themselves and others.
Poeltl and Dick have their own strenghts on offense.
With Darko's Ball sharing, the system itself creates opportunities.
We did not lose cause Barnes was hurt, we did lose cause we made avoidable mistakes.
No, they can't create. RJ on some of his drives can kick it out more, but he works as a 3rd or 4th option. He's not a guy who's good as a featured option because he is very limited and relies on being able to get to the rim or having wide open 3s.
Quickley is best used as an offball scorer. He can potentially create for others and that's what they're trying to develop him into.
Their best options today is DHOs and pick and rolls but even in those pick and rolls Quickley is going to have to be much better as a scorer off their picks to really shift the defense. He's very slow and hesitant off those. We're going to see a lot of Poeltl and Olynyk in the high post creating. The offense is clunky off that though because our guards are very slow to release. Dick needs to be featured in this more.
I think you guys overrated RJ we a scorer do much. I like what he's doing here but he's not what some of you think he is. He's only good at one thing and he has a toooon of work to do and a lot of him will require him to completely overhaul his form.
Most of them dont understand why RJ has looed better since he got here. But with Barnes out and the offence being a mess, they might soon learn. I expect Gradey to take a slide back again too, hope I'm wrong about that though.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
WetLikeWater wrote:At least draymond gave his son some high praises! Get better soon draymond 2.0 we will miss you!!
Oscirus wrote:Scase wrote:Tha Cynic wrote:
No, they can't create. RJ on some of his drives can kick it out more, but he works as a 3rd or 4th option. He's not a guy who's good as a featured option because he is very limited and relies on being able to get to the rim or having wide open 3s.
Quickley is best used as an offball scorer. He can potentially create for others and that's what they're trying to develop him into.
Their best options today is DHOs and pick and rolls but even in those pick and rolls Quickley is going to have to be much better as a scorer off their picks to really shift the defense. He's very slow and hesitant off those. We're going to see a lot of Poeltl and Olynyk in the high post creating. The offense is clunky off that though because our guards are very slow to release. Dick needs to be featured in this more.
I think you guys overrated RJ we a scorer do much. I like what he's doing here but he's not what some of you think he is. He's only good at one thing and he has a toooon of work to do and a lot of him will require him to completely overhaul his form.
Most of them dont understand why RJ has looed better since he got here. But with Barnes out and the offence being a mess, they might soon learn. I expect Gradey to take a slide back again too, hope I'm wrong about that though.
If the theory that rj is only good as a 3rd or fourth option is true then he should've ate in NY where he played with better scorers and playmakers as his first and second options yet he didn't. Calling him a 3rd or 4th option is underrating him and the work he's done in toronto.
ItsDanger wrote:No game thread today? The apathy is real.
Chandan wrote:ItsDanger wrote:No game thread today? The apathy is real.
Just waiting for draft night
Chandan wrote:ItsDanger wrote:No game thread today? The apathy is real.
Just waiting for draft night