TGW wrote:Fairview4Life wrote:Holy crap....nearly half of Democrats are succumbing to Putin's campaign of destruction:
https://www.mediaite.com/election-2024/shock-poll-trump-has-biggest-lead-since-2015-as-nearly-half-of-democrats-dont-want-biden-as-nominee-nyt/
https://www.salon.com/2024/03/05/there-is-something-at-the-new-york-times/A favorite of poll skeptics is its sampling bias. How did the New York Times come up with a polling sample that included 36 percent rural voters when the 2020 proportion of rural voters was 19 percent? Somehow, the poll’s sample of female voters was equally skewed. The poll found Trump winning the female vote by one percent, when Biden carried women in 2020 by 11 points. The Times wants you to ignore that in between, all three of Trump’s Supreme Court justices quarterbacked the Dobbs decision overturning women’s constitutional right to abortion, followed almost immediately by states banning abortion all over the country, many with no exceptions for rape or incest. The Times doesn’t say how it squares its poll numbers with the fact that women turned out in huge numbers to help win referendums confirming a right to abortion, including in such Republican strongholds as Kansas and Kentucky, and handed every special election to Democratic candidates in the bargain. They just want you to believe there’s been a 12-point swing toward Trump among women, with no evidence except, poof! It happened!
The truly incredible thing is that the New York Times provides the evidence that would cause any other reasonable journalistic enterprise to question the accuracy of its own poll. The poll shows that Trump still has the support of nearly every Republican who voted for him in 2020 — this in the face of the fact that between 30 and 40 percent of primary voters have chosen another candidate than Trump. Those people are not poll respondents. They’re voters. The Times/Siena poll also somehow comes up with 12 percent support among Democrats for Rep. Dean Phillips, who has yet to get more than two percent of the vote in a primary. Even Phillips himself posted a tweet that said “When the NYT/Siena poll shows me at 12%, you better believe it’s flawed. Only 5% even know who I am.” The poll also shows that among respondents who described themselves as unhappy with both candidates, they favor Biden over Trump by 12 points. So Biden has the utterly disaffected vote and carries independents by four points, and he’s losing to Trump by four points?
But sure, the rural population as a % of the country doubled, and Trump is winning the women vote. You should definitely listen to those 980 people.
This is funny take. So you have a problem with the polling data...do you also have a problem with the data for the other 10 or so polls that have Trump ahead?
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/national/
Keep grasping for straws buddy.
...I have a problem with the poll you highlighted as a big problem for Biden because they have the rural population at 38% of the electorate and Trump winning the women vote, amongst other baffling issues. Those aren't straws. Those are gigantic buckets dumping water on your head. You don't have to be so desperate. I have no problem believing Trump might win the election in November in part thanks to the tireless work of unpaid volunteers like yourself, but that poll isn't saying what you think it's saying.