Even The Celts Cavn't Figured Out How to Win Em All! Loss vs CLE 3/5

[The Corey's]

Are you saying that calling a timeout and changing the lineup doesn't impact the play on the court?

That calling a time out in the middle of a lopsided ass whooping has no statistically bearing on alleviating the reality?

Interesting take

Still waiting...

Don’t you know?

Timeouts are a basketball wonder drug that magically fix all ailments

So your argument is that coaching doesn't matter.

Got it.

[The Corey's]

Read on Twitter

This was my argument from the start. The refs called. BOGUS FOUL that never happened and for what? Because they didn't see it and assumed? They DID see it? How?

If they do their job, the Celtics win.

[Sweet Serenity]

I care about the playoffs.

Frankly, the Celtics should run away with the title.

Considering the 2018 Warriors with Prime Steph and Prime Durant didn’t even run away with the title, expecting us to is ridiculous.

So you're already giving Joe a bailout. Noted.

According to the Coreys, Our second year coach will only be considered good if we sweep everyone to a title

[The Corey's]

Considering the 2018 Warriors with Prime Steph and Prime Durant didn’t even run away with the title, expecting us to is ridiculous.

So you're already giving Joe a bailout. Noted.

According to the Coreys, Our second year coach will only be considered good if we sweep everyone to a title

To not accept that Joe is a coaching liability is to not deal in reality.

He was horrendous last year and everyone said he was just learning on the fly and this year he would have his own staff and implement his system.

Meanwhile, he sits there with three fingers up his ass with his serial killer stare watching as the game burns away.

What the **** is he doing when that happens? What part of that coaching do you find acceptable?

Exactly.

[Fencer reregistered]

Read on Twitter

This was my argument from the start. The refs called. BOGUS FOUL that never happened and for what? Because they didn't see it and assumed? They DID see it? How?

If they do their job, the Celtics win.

Thanks for addressing that without leaning into the conspiracy theory angle.

[Birdon]

OJT Joe spending the night in JVG’s dungeon while Brad ordered JT to watch Wade’s highlights since middle school.

[Triple7]

At least now everyone knows, even JT himself, that he ain’t on that level. All this mvp talks should just stop, and JT should just focus on winning, and doing the right play, instead of having this hero ball mamba mentality. He doesn’t have Kobe’s mentality, and definitely don’t have his shot making capabilities in the clutch.

[Mr_Mojo_Risin]

So you're already giving Joe a bailout. Noted.

According to the Coreys, Our second year coach will only be considered good if we sweep everyone to a title

To not accept that Joe is a coaching liability is to not deal in reality.

He was horrendous last year and everyone said he was just learning on the fly and this year he would have his own staff and implement his system.

Meanwhile, he sits there with three fingers up his ass with his serial killer stare watching as the game burns away.

What the **** is he doing when that happens? What part of that coaching do you find acceptable?

Exactly.

I understand those people who worry about Joe in the playoffs.

What I don’t get is those who think he’s a liability. Do you think our players are that good that they are 48-13 with the coach holding them back?

Is there anything Joe is doing well in your opinion, or is it all negative?

[The Corey's]

Read on Twitter

This was my argument from the start. The refs called. BOGUS FOUL that never happened and for what? Because they didn't see it and assumed? They DID see it? How?

If they do their job, the Celtics win.

Thanks for addressing that without leaning into the conspiracy theory angle.

No conspiracy. They're just horrible at their job. If they do their job there is no whistle.

[The Corey's]

According to the Coreys, Our second year coach will only be considered good if we sweep everyone to a title

To not accept that Joe is a coaching liability is to not deal in reality.

He was horrendous last year and everyone said he was just learning on the fly and this year he would have his own staff and implement his system.

Meanwhile, he sits there with three fingers up his ass with his serial killer stare watching as the game burns away.

What the **** is he doing when that happens? What part of that coaching do you find acceptable?

Exactly.

I understand those people who worry about Joe in the playoffs.

What I don’t get is those who think he’s a liability. Do you think our players are that good that they are 48-13 with the coach holding them back?

Is there anything Joe is doing well in your opinion, or is it all negative?

I'd have this team under 7 loses.

Joe is a passenger. Not a innovator.

[Fencer reregistered]

To not accept that Joe is a coaching liability is to not deal in reality.

He was horrendous last year and everyone said he was just learning on the fly and this year he would have his own staff and implement his system.

Meanwhile, he sits there with three fingers up his ass with his serial killer stare watching as the game burns away.

What the **** is he doing when that happens? What part of that coaching do you find acceptable?

Exactly.

I understand those people who worry about Joe in the playoffs.

What I don’t get is those who think he’s a liability. Do you think our players are that good that they are 48-13 with the coach holding them back?

Is there anything Joe is doing well in your opinion, or is it all negative?

I'd have this team under 7 loses.

Joe is a passenger. Not a innovator.

Do you think you're a better coach than Ime Udoka, or do you think Ime would also have them with that kind of record?

How about Brad?

[ScottieJ]

Are you saying that calling a timeout and changing the lineup doesn't impact the play on the court?

That calling a time out in the middle of a lopsided ass whooping has no statistically bearing on alleviating the reality?

Interesting take

Still waiting...

You'll get your ridiculous arbitrary evidence when you produce the evidence that you're arguing.

I'm not arguing anything, just waiting for you to provide a shred of evidence to back up what you are claiming.

I reckon I'll be waiting a while...

[doogie_hauser]

So I read on twitter that Joe Mazz called for time out with 4.6 remaining and the ref didn't see it?

We may(probably) not have won, but it's still pretty infuriating.

The sky is not falling in folks.. Might be time to chill a bit, players and coaches aren't perfect.

We have a great record from bouncing back from losses this season

[The Corey's]

I understand those people who worry about Joe in the playoffs.

What I don’t get is those who think he’s a liability. Do you think our players are that good that they are 48-13 with the coach holding them back?

Is there anything Joe is doing well in your opinion, or is it all negative?

I'd have this team under 7 loses.

Joe is a passenger. Not a innovator.

Do you think you're a better coach than Ime Udoka, or do you think Ime would also have them with that kind of record?

How about Brad?

While the Celtics are aying better defense this year than last year, Ime had them playing at a historical level in the second half of the 21/22 season.

He ain't afraid to call out Tatum for a ridiculous end of game shot. Not that he would have had to because he would have called a time up to draw up a better play.

[The Corey's]

Still waiting...

You'll get your ridiculous arbitrary evidence when you produce the evidence that you're arguing.

I'm not arguing anything, just waiting for you to provide a shred of evidence to back up what you are claiming.

I reckon I'll be waiting a while...

If you're not going to goto bat for your own argument then go away.

If you need a diagram showing why a timeout at the end of the game to get your best play in is better than letting your players decide the best play for you then I don't think you're being serious about your take at all.

What you're asking for is not only unreasonable but cant be quantified.

But sure dawg, letting the players run their own play to end the game, in a quarter in which they're having trouble scoring and making the right decision instead of calling a timeout, getting your best shooters on the floor and drawing up a play they hopefully (apparently not) are practicing every day sounds like the way to go.

Cause you know. Statistical evidence.

[Sweet Serenity]

So you're already giving Joe a bailout. Noted.

According to the Coreys, Our second year coach will only be considered good if we sweep everyone to a title

To not accept that Joe is a coaching liability is to not deal in reality.

He was horrendous last year and everyone said he was just learning on the fly and this year he would have his own staff and implement his system.

Meanwhile, he sits there with three fingers up his ass with his serial killer stare watching as the game burns away.

What the **** is he doing when that happens? What part of that coaching do you find acceptable?

Exactly.

Ah yes, he’s so bad that he’s lead us to a 48-13 record while having the 4th best net rating of all time ..

What a terrible coach

[ScottieJ]

You'll get your ridiculous arbitrary evidence when you produce the evidence that you're arguing.

I'm not arguing anything, just waiting for you to provide a shred of evidence to back up what you are claiming.

I reckon I'll be waiting a while...

If you're not going to goto bat for your own argument then go away.

If you need a diagram showing why a timeout at the end of the game to get your best play in is better than letting your players decide the best play for you then I don't think you're being serious about your take at all.

What you're asking for is not only unreasonable but cant be quantified.

But sure dawg, letting the players run their own play to end the game, in a quarter in which they're having trouble scoring and making the right decision instead of calling a timeout, getting your best shooters on the floor and drawing up a play they hopefully (apparently not) are practicing every day sounds like the way to go.

Cause you know. Statistical evidence.

Proved my point, thank you.

[Fierce1]

Nah!

I say let's just give the naysayers their space.

If Cs win total is around 65-61, that means the whining is only about 17 to 21 times.

One thing's for sure there will be at least 60 times the naysayers and the whiners are in hibernation.

Can you imagine if the Cs win Banner 18 and Joe is the coach?

Two things might happen:

1. A lot of crows falling from the sky.

2. Excuses will be 99 pages long.

[The Corey's]

According to the Coreys, Our second year coach will only be considered good if we sweep everyone to a title

To not accept that Joe is a coaching liability is to not deal in reality.

He was horrendous last year and everyone said he was just learning on the fly and this year he would have his own staff and implement his system.

Meanwhile, he sits there with three fingers up his ass with his serial killer stare watching as the game burns away.

What the **** is he doing when that happens? What part of that coaching do you find acceptable?

Exactly.

Ah yes, he’s so bad that he’s lead us to a 48-13 record while having the 4th best net rating of all time ..

What a terrible coach

Ahh. You think it's Joe and not the roster. Now it makes sense.

So when they win it's cause Joe coaching. When they lose it's cause they didn't take to Joe's coaching.

I found Joe's burner account.

[The Corey's]

I'm not arguing anything, just waiting for you to provide a shred of evidence to back up what you are claiming.

I reckon I'll be waiting a while...

If you're not going to goto bat for your own argument then go away.

If you need a diagram showing why a timeout at the end of the game to get your best play in is better than letting your players decide the best play for you then I don't think you're being serious about your take at all.

What you're asking for is not only unreasonable but cant be quantified.

But sure dawg, letting the players run their own play to end the game, in a quarter in which they're having trouble scoring and making the right decision instead of calling a timeout, getting your best shooters on the floor and drawing up a play they hopefully (apparently not) are practicing every day sounds like the way to go.

Cause you know. Statistical evidence.

Proved my point, thank you.

I proved my point. Thank you.