rajajackal wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:rajajackal wrote:people think it means you don't like his game to say this, but he is better suited to a role as a power-reserve. sadly we don't have much of a choice at the moment
when he is healthy though, i am not sure how mitch has an better argument to starting over ihart. ihart at full strength actually helps our offense and defensively he is very good. our offense is worse with mitch
the offense really started to click when we swapped rj for og. when we have og and randle back on the floor, i'm not sure how much the offense would suffer, or it'd offset the value of mitch's presence down low. i'd like to see before demoting the guy who's held us down longer than anyone else on the roster
while i agree swapping rj for og made us a lot better on offense, i think you're discrediting hartenstein. hartenstein isn't clogging the paint as much as mitch and it opens up the offense.
he's also a skilled passer too