Ryoga Hibiki wrote:I like this video that dropped yesterday:
I think this is an example of someone having unusual strengths and weaknesses and people being very rigid on what is necessary to win at high level.
It was the same with Jokic, who though is so good that totally broke some analysts thinking process.
But I feel that those same people have not been challenging their own approach but just look at Nikola as an exception.
I think Domas can be the same at a much lower level, but he will need some good breaks to show it.
What I like the most that it's shown here is that this kind of player can enable up to four other players to be always in attack mode as he's the one making most of the decisions. And all these guys can play two man games with him or cut off ball with good chance of success.
is he Jokic? No, not even close, but he's a solid all NBA player.
This sums up a point I've been trying to make on here for a while. Jokic is an all-time talent, sure. But there are other all-time talents playing right now as well--ones that fit much more into the dogmatic conventions of "what you need to win a ring." There absolutely should be a bigger undercurrent of the basketball nerd hivemind that's questioning their preconceived notions about what you supposedly
need to win a ring.
Yes, Jokic is an all-time offensive player, but citing that as the reason he's some kind of "exception to the rule" would imply that Denver rolled through the playoffs with a series of shootouts where they just outscored everyone, and that's not reality. It's also true that Denver had an excellent defense in their finals run last season, despite not just Jokic not being a conventional rim protector, but Murray and Porter generally being defensive targets. Part of that is of course their offensive excellence. Part of it is that our preconceived notions of what can make for a championship-level defense is at best outdated, and we all simply don't know as much as we think we do.
UcanUwill wrote:I like his ability to grab a rebound and run on fast break right away, I think its a real advantage some bigger players now can have. Domantas' handle seem lose, but it works, he is very comfotable with it. I do however think he is not the passer or playmaker as his stats suggest, he gets a lot of assists from hand off screen action, and his teammates are just good shooters in those situations. He is not Jokić, where the guy finds and creates stuff from scratch entirely. You can teach other guys what Domantas does, I feel. But you can't teach them what Jokić does, with him it is natural basketball genius.
To me, this dismissal misses a primary point of the video. It's not as much about the passing skill (though it often is that as well) as it is about the orchestration. He's deciding in the moment every time on those DHOs where the possession is going to go, adjusting screen angles, pulling the DHO back for a keeper drive to the hoop, reading where the help is coming at super advanced levels that really only one other C can do.
Perhaps my favorite part of this video is the part pointing out how Sabonis allows teammates to be in attack mode. There's a lot made of how hard it is to build around him, and this is partially true in some ways to be sure. It's also true that you're able to build a team with worse decision-makers (relatively speaking) because he takes that burden off of them. Fox is frankly not an elite floor general, but he is an elite attacker. Sabonis' presence allows him to play to his strengths. It's similar for Monk. He constantly starts scorers off with advantages due to his elite screening and decision-making so that the only decision-making they really need to do is pretty basic drive and kick stuff.