"Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

MKWB
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,727
And1: 628
Joined: May 26, 2007
 

"Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#1 » by MKWB » Thu Mar 14, 2024 4:54 am

Fun experiment. Say you have a directive to only keep Zion, Ingram, Herb, and Murphy on the Pelicans, and remake the roster around them the best you can with realistic trades. What's your plan? Example trade ideas that makes sense for both teams?
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,544
And1: 43,749
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#2 » by zimpy27 » Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:17 am

Daniels, Herb, Ingram, Zion, Val
Alvarado, Hawkins, Naji, Murphy, Nance

Seems fairly obvious that you just upgrade this by trading CJ and picks for another star.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
User avatar
Mrakar
Analyst
Posts: 3,104
And1: 3,907
Joined: Sep 01, 2010

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#3 » by Mrakar » Thu Mar 14, 2024 11:04 am

zimpy27 wrote:Daniels, Herb, Ingram, Zion, Val
Alvarado, Hawkins, Naji, Murphy, Nance

Seems fairly obvious that you just upgrade this by trading CJ and picks for another star.

That will not work considering money since Murphy and Daniels will ask for that bag.
There is two options for this team and that is go for average point guard(someone like Tyus Jones) or try to bring back CP if he has something left and try to upgrade at center( both moves using CJ, Daniels and picks) or go in for small ball and go all in for star loint guard(problem is there is noone availible outside Hawks duo probably and they are not good fit).

There is ofc course option of trading BI or Z, but i would put my priority on getting rid of CJ. He is grey mentour of the court but he is terrible decision maker on the court.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,923
And1: 7,865
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#4 » by jayjaysee » Thu Mar 14, 2024 11:56 am

CJM to either a desperate contender or a rebuilding team looking to start winning and have young guys ready to develop.. Then find a two way guard.

The quickest version is DJM to NOP, CJM to Orlando, and assets to Atlanta. I would throw in another asset to turn Nance into Capela..
Mavrelous
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Posts: 19,646
And1: 17,473
Joined: Aug 20, 2020

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#5 » by Mavrelous » Thu Mar 14, 2024 11:59 am

jayjaysee wrote:CJM to either a desperate contender or a rebuilding team looking to start winning and have young guys ready to develop.. Then find a two way guard.

The quickest version is DJM to NOP, CJM to Orlando, and assets to Atlanta. I would throw in another asset to turn Nance into Capela..

Was thinking CJM for WCJ and sign Tyus for MLE
Defense wins draft lotteries!
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,923
And1: 7,865
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#6 » by jayjaysee » Thu Mar 14, 2024 12:09 pm

Mavrelous wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:CJM to either a desperate contender or a rebuilding team looking to start winning and have young guys ready to develop.. Then find a two way guard.

The quickest version is DJM to NOP, CJM to Orlando, and assets to Atlanta. I would throw in another asset to turn Nance into Capela..

Was thinking CJM for WCJ and sign Tyus for MLE


Yours is definitely more realistic, but I think Tyus goes for more than the MLE.. Orlando/SAS as the first two, but thinking Utah and Toronto as well.

But could be a sign and trade tied into the CJM deal, I doubt NOP is worried about hard capping themselves (both because they have plenty of room and have no interest in spending to the apron..)

WCJ’s cheaper contract and spacing is probably more interesting than Capela’s defense.
MKWB
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,727
And1: 628
Joined: May 26, 2007
 

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#7 » by MKWB » Thu Mar 14, 2024 2:08 pm

Some cool ideas here. Yea CJ going out (or accepting a bench role) would be best for sure. I wish the front office could look past the "leadership" label and be willing to improve that spot. Magic and Nets might be the only teams who actually make sense for him, though.

Nance is a liability/non-factor now. His expiring 10$mil. should definitely be moved in some way to upgrade before next deadline. And JV- solid, great guy. But since he's a UFA who should make around MLE on his next contract, it sure would be nice to trade for an upgrade who really fits well with the young core. Even signing Hartenstein or Goga to that same MLE contract may be a better fit.

I'll post some ideas of what I would do later.
louc1970
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,505
And1: 477
Joined: Feb 16, 2016

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#8 » by louc1970 » Thu Mar 14, 2024 3:07 pm

Along the same idea:
Pelicans trade McCollum
Pelicans receive WCJ, Wallace, Giddey
Pelicans move off an aging but still very good player and bring in a center and a younger group of guards.

Magic trade WCJ, Isaacs
Magic receive McCollum, 24 FRP (OKC via Utah top 10 protected)
Magic get a player to play next to Suggs in the backcourt, a pick that most likely will not convey this year and reduce the number of bigs they have.

OKC trades Wallace, Giddey, 24 FRP (Utah)
OKC receives Isaacs
OKC is sending a part time starter in Giddey and a player with potential (but will be a backup behind Williams) and a pick for a player that can play beside Holmgren at either the 4 or 5 while not taking the ball away from SGA.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,605
And1: 13,967
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#9 » by JRoy » Thu Mar 14, 2024 4:00 pm

louc1970 wrote:Along the same idea:
Pelicans trade McCollum
Pelicans receive WCJ, Wallace, Giddey
Pelicans move off an aging but still very good player and bring in a center and a younger group of guards.

Magic trade WCJ, Isaacs
Magic receive McCollum, 24 FRP (OKC via Utah top 10 protected)
Magic get a player to play next to Suggs in the backcourt, a pick that most likely will not convey this year and reduce the number of bigs they have.

OKC trades Wallace, Giddey, 24 FRP (Utah)
OKC receives Isaacs
OKC is sending a part time starter in Giddey and a player with potential (but will be a backup behind Williams) and a pick for a player that can play beside Holmgren at either the 4 or 5 while not taking the ball away from SGA.


That looks like a huge overpay for JI to me. He can’t stay healthy.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,471
And1: 14,205
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#10 » by HornetJail » Thu Mar 14, 2024 4:30 pm

it's going to take a lot more than 45 games (out of 64) of 15mpg for Isaac to have actual value again. Encouraging sign that he's played as many games this season as he did in the previous 4 combined, but there's way anybody's trading a future pick OR a Wallace level talent, let alone both.
investigate Adam Silver
louc1970
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,505
And1: 477
Joined: Feb 16, 2016

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#11 » by louc1970 » Thu Mar 14, 2024 4:36 pm

JRoy wrote:
louc1970 wrote:Along the same idea:
Pelicans trade McCollum
Pelicans receive WCJ, Wallace, Giddey
Pelicans move off an aging but still very good player and bring in a center and a younger group of guards.

Magic trade WCJ, Isaacs
Magic receive McCollum, 24 FRP (OKC via Utah top 10 protected)
Magic get a player to play next to Suggs in the backcourt, a pick that most likely will not convey this year and reduce the number of bigs they have.

OKC trades Wallace, Giddey, 24 FRP (Utah)
OKC receives Isaacs
OKC is sending a part time starter in Giddey and a player with potential (but will be a backup behind Williams) and a pick for a player that can play beside Holmgren at either the 4 or 5 while not taking the ball away from SGA.


That looks like a huge overpay for JI to me. He can’t stay healthy.

I get that, but in reality the cost is not that great. Wallace is valued as potential.
OKC with the Rockets pick is picking up a player with equal potential. One of those players is being sent elsewhere or rotting on the bench behind Willaims.
At the same time, Giddey has probably maxed out what he will be - a real good rotational role player.
Bringing in a defensive presence in Isaacs keeps cost low and allows Holmgren to move out of the lane on offense - limiting the abuse he takes on his thin frame. Defensively, Isaacs and Holmgren are interchangeable.
In closing, OKC is really giving up 1 player and 1 potential player.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,605
And1: 13,967
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#12 » by JRoy » Thu Mar 14, 2024 4:40 pm

louc1970 wrote:
JRoy wrote:
louc1970 wrote:Along the same idea:
Pelicans trade McCollum
Pelicans receive WCJ, Wallace, Giddey
Pelicans move off an aging but still very good player and bring in a center and a younger group of guards.

Magic trade WCJ, Isaacs
Magic receive McCollum, 24 FRP (OKC via Utah top 10 protected)
Magic get a player to play next to Suggs in the backcourt, a pick that most likely will not convey this year and reduce the number of bigs they have.

OKC trades Wallace, Giddey, 24 FRP (Utah)
OKC receives Isaacs
OKC is sending a part time starter in Giddey and a player with potential (but will be a backup behind Williams) and a pick for a player that can play beside Holmgren at either the 4 or 5 while not taking the ball away from SGA.


That looks like a huge overpay for JI to me. He can’t stay healthy.

I get that, but in reality the cost is not that great. Wallace is valued as potential.
OKC with the Rockets pick is picking up a player with equal potential. One of those players is being sent elsewhere or rotting on the bench behind Willaims.
At the same time, Giddey has probably maxed out what he will be - a real good rotational role player.
Bringing in a defensive presence in Isaacs keeps cost low and allows Holmgren to move out of the lane on offense - limiting the abuse he takes on his thin frame. Defensively, Isaacs and Holmgren are interchangeable.
In closing, OKC is really giving up 1 player and 1 potential player.


I disagree.

JI cannot stay healthy. His value is considerably less than a productive rotation player on a rookie contract, a promising rookie and a FRP.

I can see OKC giving up one of those, maybe. All three? Ridiculous.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Tripod
RealGM
Posts: 11,911
And1: 11,605
Joined: Aug 13, 2021
 

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#13 » by Tripod » Thu Mar 14, 2024 4:55 pm

louc1970 wrote:
JRoy wrote:
louc1970 wrote:Along the same idea:
Pelicans trade McCollum
Pelicans receive WCJ, Wallace, Giddey
Pelicans move off an aging but still very good player and bring in a center and a younger group of guards.

Magic trade WCJ, Isaacs
Magic receive McCollum, 24 FRP (OKC via Utah top 10 protected)
Magic get a player to play next to Suggs in the backcourt, a pick that most likely will not convey this year and reduce the number of bigs they have.

OKC trades Wallace, Giddey, 24 FRP (Utah)
OKC receives Isaacs
OKC is sending a part time starter in Giddey and a player with potential (but will be a backup behind Williams) and a pick for a player that can play beside Holmgren at either the 4 or 5 while not taking the ball away from SGA.


That looks like a huge overpay for JI to me. He can’t stay healthy.

I get that, but in reality the cost is not that great. Wallace is valued as potential.
OKC with the Rockets pick is picking up a player with equal potential. One of those players is being sent elsewhere or rotting on the bench behind Willaims.
At the same time, Giddey has probably maxed out what he will be - a real good rotational role player.
Bringing in a defensive presence in Isaacs keeps cost low and allows Holmgren to move out of the lane on offense - limiting the abuse he takes on his thin frame. Defensively, Isaacs and Holmgren are interchangeable.
In closing, OKC is really giving up 1 player and 1 potential player.

Not a chance OKC does that. A much closer deal is:

Pels get Giddey....a pass 1st PG to others who want to score and saves Pels $
Magic get CJ....a scoring PG next to Suggs and a vet to help the youth
OKC get WCJ...a small C who can shoot the 3, saves Chet vs bigger C's, and has a cheap contract locked in
Wolveswin
General Manager
Posts: 7,997
And1: 2,832
Joined: Aug 22, 2020
 

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#14 » by Wolveswin » Thu Mar 14, 2024 5:08 pm

Watch what happens with Mitchell in Cleveland. Why? Garland might become “available.”

It would take one of Murphy or Herb with McCollum, but Garland is great fit in New Orleans.
User avatar
Ducklett
General Manager
Posts: 8,047
And1: 5,507
Joined: Jul 17, 2012
 

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#15 » by Ducklett » Thu Mar 14, 2024 5:23 pm

I don't think I trade WCJ for CJ and a first, let alone straight up. CJ is overpaid and shoots the 3 worse than WCJ (and somehow Suggs is higher). Not to mention CJ is 33, he will age out before our guys hit the start of their primes. There is a lot if teams that like WCJ that certainly would offer much better deals.

Magic say thank you, but we like our guy.
tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,550
And1: 1,263
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#16 » by tester551 » Thu Mar 14, 2024 6:04 pm

jayjaysee wrote:The quickest version is DJM to NOP, CJM to Orlando, and assets to Atlanta. I would throw in another asset to turn Nance into Capela..

I think Pels would have to add a little to change CJM into DJM.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,370
And1: 9,917
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#17 » by BlazersBroncos » Thu Mar 14, 2024 6:21 pm

CJM and a FRP for WCJ and filler seems to fit.

I dont think CJ has the value for a straight up swap for WCJ.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,605
And1: 13,967
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#18 » by JRoy » Thu Mar 14, 2024 6:34 pm

Wolveswin wrote:Watch what happens with Mitchell in Cleveland. Why? Garland might become “available.”

It would take one of Murphy or Herb with McCollum, but Garland is great fit in New Orleans.


A young all star level Pg is a great fit in most franchises.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,923
And1: 7,865
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#19 » by jayjaysee » Thu Mar 14, 2024 7:24 pm

tester551 wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:The quickest version is DJM to NOP, CJM to Orlando, and assets to Atlanta. I would throw in another asset to turn Nance into Capela..

I think Pels would have to add a little to change CJM into DJM.


I agree. Atlanta is definitely owed value.

I don’t think Orlando is owed anything for taking CJM on. I have him as a slight positive as he’s on a declining contract, but the cap space Orlando gives up is the value they pay for him.
lordjeff05
Analyst
Posts: 3,146
And1: 841
Joined: Mar 01, 2010

Re: "Re-tool" Pelicans around Zion/Ingram/Herb/Murphy 

Post#20 » by lordjeff05 » Thu Mar 14, 2024 7:38 pm

Ducklett wrote:I don't think I trade WCJ for CJ and a first, let alone straight up. CJ is overpaid and shoots the 3 worse than WCJ (and somehow Suggs is higher). Not to mention CJ is 33, he will age out before our guys hit the start of their primes. There is a lot if teams that like WCJ that certainly would offer much better deals.

Magic say thank you, but we like our guy.


Not to quibble but CJ does not shoot the 3 worse than WCJ. I get he may not be on your timeline but he is a much better shooter than either player. Just from a pure percentage play, CJ is at 41 percent to Suggs and WCJ at 40 percent. More importantly, CJ is tied for 9th in the league with the amount of 3 point makes per game. He makes almost as many 3s as Suggs and WCJ do COMBINED (3.2 vs. 3.3).

I think the chances of trading CJ are unlikely and I think we'd try and use different assets to get him if it came to that.

Return to Trades and Transactions