penbeast0 wrote:PooledSilver wrote:Dutchball97 wrote:
Most people generally are going to have pretty similar lists of top 10 "greatest" and top 10 "best" players. Greatest leans more into career and best leans more into peak but there is still a lot of overlap there.
But since you're saying not relative to peers you want something different?
I meant
Greatest = best amongst your peers
Best = better at basketball
Demar isn’t a greater basketball player than, let’s say Sam Jones, but he’s obviously better at basketball
Not obvious to me. IF you mean he takes more advantage of rules, refereeing, and training techniques that weren't available in the 1960s, sure. IF you mean a better understanding, consistency of effort, and skill set relative to the rules and world of their time, Sam Jones was probably the better player.
If what you want to ask is who would be the top 10 players in the world if everyone came to today's game with a time machine then yeah, you would get a list that's greatly loaded with the 10 best players of the last 10 years with maybe a couple of the greatest of their time sneaking onto the list like Jordan.
Demar derozan would be better in the 1960s than Sam jones would be if you have him a week and a few scrimmages to adjust. That’s like, the least controversial take ever
Basketball is positional, you can maybe argue that big play is much less skill based in comparison to guard play and you can get by more on physical tools in comparison, but guard play has evolved an extreme amount every year. 70 years from now I’m sure there will be multiple players who shoot better than curry did and finish better than bron, but even then you can argue it’s leveled off more as the league isn’t in its first 10-15 years.









