Kobblehead wrote:Aren't the Pacers under .500 since acquiring Siakam?
Aren't the Knicks playing at like a 80% win rate with Annunoby?
OG was clearly the guy to trade for.
OG is a more impactful player than Siakam.
In the context you mentioned, the Knicks would also have a higher win rate if Siakam were with the Knicks and OG were with the Pacers. Largely impacted with Haliburton’s absence and big drop in performance (shooting only 17% on 3s this month among others) and Jalen Brunson’s continued great performance (averaging 30+ppg on almost 50% shooting in the last 15 games).
I don't mind OG or Siakam. It's just that Siakam is a better fit in my eyes because we can generate more mismatches with him, leading to a higher number of high-quality shots.
We can run a Siakam-Maxey pick-and-roll, opening up numerous possibilities on offense. Siakam has been a go to guy for Pacers in a lot of their game such as their last game against the Nets where he scored 28-11-4 and carried the Pacers. In contrast, OG is rarely a go to guy option or rarely asked to create on offense for the Knicks, and has fewer abilities in creating offense for himself and his teammates.
OG would have been better if Embiid's availability were reliable, with him playing most of the season and not experiencing a significant drop in performance. However, given the nature of Embiid's situation, we need someone who can play a similar role (though not at the same level) when Embiid is unavailable or playing poorly.
The issue with Siakam in the past was his lack of floor spacing, but he has since become reliable in shooting corner threes and finishing around the rim, which could be his role when Embiid is back.
Aside from not being a better fit than Siakam, the price tag is also quite high. The Knicks had to give up two 20-point scorers in Quickley and Barrett, along with picks, while the Pacers only gave up role players and a couple of picks with second-round value in other drafts.
Nevertheless, both OG and Siakam would have made us much better, but I trust Morey to have better plans.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.