nedleeds wrote:god shammgod wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
The Wolves didn't have a Brundle and IShart.
Knicks will make it work.
Mitch will thrive backing up the Stifle Tower.
the knicks might very well trade for him but he won't be playing the 5. it will be a randle for towns swap and he'll be playing the 4. the wolves proved it's better this year. why would anyone go back to him at the 5 ?
Wolves are 6+ games better than the Knicks. Why are they trading us their best player again? Because Bing Bong? The only argument I can see if I'm a Wolves fan is financial:
* Gobert's insane contract is untradable without attaching assets.
* KAT's contract which ramps to ( ) $61 million and goes out 4 *more* years.
* ANT is our best player and he's 22. Jaden McDaniels is owed $135 and probably needs to have a bigger role.
After Goberts turd is flushed after 2026 Wolves could just go after whoever fits best with Ant. If KAT is there, he'll be declining making $55 million and Ant will be 24 or 25 hitting his prime. Randle's contract expires after 2026 also which pairs with Gobert nicely, assuming he picks up the player option. He can also decline and try and get a new deal.
why laugh at KATs contract?
think about what we're gonna have to pay Randle
hint: he'll hit 61m too.