thelead wrote:KCP would be a very nice pickup
I think so too
Great vet with playoff and title experience, Can play great D and shoot 3s
Perfect fit and shouldn't cost more than 20M per year, it ll be very expensive for Denver to keep him
Moderators: UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior
thelead wrote:KCP would be a very nice pickup
cedric76 wrote:thelead wrote:KCP would be a very nice pickup
I think so too
Great vet with playoff and title experience, Can play great D and shoot 3s
Perfect fit and shouldn't cost more than 20M per year, it ll be very expensive for Denver to keep him
AaronB wrote:Knightro wrote:I would probably lean towards Russell over Monk. Better shooter and probably would come cheaper because he's a little older.
The Lakers do not want to lose him.
However, I am not sure if the Lakers have bird rights.
Not sure if he signed an extension or a new contract with a player option after 1 year.
As we found out with Goga, a new contract requires 3 years for full bird rights.
I am pretty sure an extension maintains the Lakers bird rights and they can sign him to more money.
Without bird rights, they will have to sign him under the cap, which is not going to happen.
cedric76 wrote:thelead wrote:KCP would be a very nice pickup
I think so too
Great vet with playoff and title experience, Can play great D and shoot 3s
Perfect fit and shouldn't cost more than 20M per year, it ll be very expensive for Denver to keep him
I think only Fultz would be gone and replaced by KCP, Kennard, Allen, or Monk at around the same salary. AB and Jett will have to win minutes again next season.eyriq wrote:I'm thinking we see 4 new rotation players next season. My picks:
Out -> WCJ, Harris, Ingles, and Fultz
In -> Claxton, Kyle Anderson, AB, Jett
Rainwater wrote:AaronB wrote:Knightro wrote:I would probably lean towards Russell over Monk. Better shooter and probably would come cheaper because he's a little older.
The Lakers do not want to lose him.
However, I am not sure if the Lakers have bird rights.
Not sure if he signed an extension or a new contract with a player option after 1 year.
As we found out with Goga, a new contract requires 3 years for full bird rights.
I am pretty sure an extension maintains the Lakers bird rights and they can sign him to more money.
Without bird rights, they will have to sign him under the cap, which is not going to happen.
It’s been widely reported the Lakers want a 3rd star. Unless they don’t get that third Russell is gone.
AaronB wrote:Skybox wrote:The-Stallion70 wrote:
You are just wrong bruh
Wendell is one of the best paint defenders in the league and provides more offense than Claxton would. Our 24th ranked offense would be even worse with Claxton.
You mention rim protection, how do you define rim protection? Because Isaac does a pretty good job of blocking shots and so do our guards, Wendell, forwards, etc.
You say we have a *TOTAL* lack of rim protection which is not even true.
And even so simply blocking shots is not reason enough to acquire a guy, just because he blocks shots. Why don't we trade for Bamba then?
Isaac plays half the game (at most) and usually at the 3, creating havoc on the perimeter…I think Isaac should play at Center- but he doesn’t. Claxton has zero in common with Bamba
Bruh
Uhm, Isaac has more blocks per 36 than either Goga or Claxton and he ain't getting those standing out on the perimeter.
He is only out on the perimeter because he has generational defensive talent, but he is an elite rim protector, much better than Claxton.
Make the argument that he does not stay healthy enough to help the team (can't protect the rim in the rehab center) and that works.
But trying to make the argument that he is not a rim protector while in the game is no where close to being accurate.
eyriq wrote:Only when he plays us, mostly stats.thelead wrote:eyriq wrote:I'm thinking we see 4 new rotation players next season. My picks:
Out -> WCJ, Harris, Ingles, and Fultz
In -> Claxton, Kyle Anderson, AB, Jett
Serious question... do you actually watch Claxton or are you just looking at stats?WCJ vs ClaxtonSOUL wrote:I think that's like a -7 win team
Kyle vs Ingles
Harris vs Jett
Fultz vs AB
And you think the team drops 7 games? Good lord
eyriq wrote:I need more support

Jiwol wrote:cedric76 wrote:thelead wrote:KCP would be a very nice pickup
I think so too
Great vet with playoff and title experience, Can play great D and shoot 3s
Perfect fit and shouldn't cost more than 20M per year, it ll be very expensive for Denver to keep him
And nevertheless your precious Jett would be a starter at some point, ain't he? Lol
cedric76 wrote:Jiwol wrote:cedric76 wrote:
I think so too
Great vet with playoff and title experience, Can play great D and shoot 3s
Perfect fit and shouldn't cost more than 20M per year, it ll be very expensive for Denver to keep him
And nevertheless your precious Jett would be a starter at some point, ain't he? Lol
Long season, injuries, time management, yes Jett will start some games next season
Learning being kcp can only help Jett

Whoop there it is!!!JoshuaPotter wrote:eyriq wrote:Only when he plays us, mostly stats.thelead wrote:Serious question... do you actually watch Claxton or are you just looking at stats?WCJ vs ClaxtonSOUL wrote:I think that's like a -7 win team
Kyle vs Ingles
Harris vs Jett
Fultz vs AB
And you think the team drops 7 games? Good lordeyriq wrote:I need more support
Here I am!
Drop -7 games? What in the actual bleepy bleep bleep.
The absolute worst comment I can think of is Ingles absence might cost us a couple that we hopefully gain back with net zero production from Fultz to Black.
I get it, some posters here are homers for certain players and some are polar opposites. -7 with perhaps a lock for 1st defensive team?
OK, let's pretend that
1 ) Management isn't prioritizing defense. - They are even if they did sign Ingles
2 ) Management didn't shop Fultz + WCJ - This is wildly accepted
Do we really think Fultz + WCJ for Dlo was the missing piece we were trying to nab?
davey_wavy wrote:I’d like to keep Gary around. Good defender, can shoot the 3 OK, and the guys like him.
This whole replace him with Jett or whatever is dumb. Jett will be a bust sooner than later
eyriq wrote:Whoop there it is!!!

I'm not even worried about offense.JoshuaPotter wrote:eyriq wrote:Whoop there it is!!!
This is definitely directed at @knightro
I get it. He is concerned we are a paper tiger. Next year he thinks it is very possible we have a worse record then whatever this year is come end of season. Sure, it's possible we don't do as well next year.
So this is kinda a call out. If this squad puts us -7 games down from this year...how many games down were you thinking we would be down to begin with.
Can't say we are going to be worse next year, then start throwing random numbers out because you just don't like personnel adjustments proposed anyway.
eyriq wrote:I'm not even worried about offense.JoshuaPotter wrote:eyriq wrote:Whoop there it is!!!
This is definitely directed at @knightro
I get it. He is concerned we are a paper tiger. Next year he thinks it is very possible we have a worse record then whatever this year is come end of season. Sure, it's possible we don't do as well next year.
So this is kinda a call out. If this squad puts us -7 games down from this year...how many games down were you thinking we would be down to begin with.
Can't say we are going to be worse next year, then start throwing random numbers out because you just don't like personnel adjustments proposed anyway.
The goal should be to maintain a top 3 defense and improve ball control. The focus on shooting is a distraction. Lower turnovers is where it's at. Paolo, Franz, Moe, and Cole can continue to be our offensive engine, just need to reduce turnovers.
KillMonger wrote:Hartenstein+tyus Jones.... No need to overthink it
Sent from my [Hands] using RealGM mobile app

KillMonger wrote:Hartenstein+tyus Jones.... No need to overthink it
Sent from my [Hands] using RealGM mobile app
Just Googled "Do Lakers have Full Bird rights on D'Angelo Russell" and different articles popped up stating it.AaronB wrote:CocoaFan wrote:Lakers have full bird rights. He's going to be tough to pry away if he keeps playing the way he has been.Knightro wrote:I would probably lean towards Russell over Monk. Better shooter and probably would come cheaper because he's a little older.
Where did you see this?
I could not find it anywhere.