ImageImageImageImageImage

Pacers Pick Tracking (Update: #19 officially)

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford

YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,672
And1: 33,335
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1121 » by YogurtProducer » Fri Apr 5, 2024 4:37 pm

Tor_Raps wrote:
RoteSchroder wrote:[youtube][/youtube]
Tor_Raps wrote:
Part of being a good team is being able to overcome injuries. Every team gets hurt, only the crappy ones cry about it. It just exposes the lack of true depth and lack of roster balance on this team...


What’s your point. All I did was list the stats.


Think my point was pretty clear to anyone (maybe not you) that wants to use injuries as an excuse as to why we sucked this year lol.

I think it is pretty indisputable to bring up injuries for this teams current iteration.

Our starting lineup of IQ/RJ/Barnes/Poeltl has played literally 234 minutes together over 14 games (7-7) and that was with tons of player movement going on and what not every 2 games it felt like. Pretty sure at least one of those games was the one Scottie got hurt and barely played to.

Like we are bad - but far from 23-58 bad or whatever we even are at this point :lol:
Tor_Raps
RealGM
Posts: 32,507
And1: 47,263
Joined: Oct 14, 2018

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1122 » by Tor_Raps » Fri Apr 5, 2024 5:32 pm

YogurtProducer wrote:
Tor_Raps wrote:
RoteSchroder wrote:[youtube][/youtube]

What’s your point. All I did was list the stats.


Think my point was pretty clear to anyone (maybe not you) that wants to use injuries as an excuse as to why we sucked this year lol.

I think it is pretty indisputable to bring up injuries for this teams current iteration.

Our starting lineup of IQ/RJ/Barnes/Poeltl has played literally 234 minutes together over 14 games (7-7) and that was with tons of player movement going on and what not every 2 games it felt like. Pretty sure at least one of those games was the one Scottie got hurt and barely played to.

Like we are bad - but far from 23-58 bad or whatever we even are at this point :lol:


Only the Raptors fanbase will talk about a Poeltl injury when other teams are missing guys like Embiid/Maxey, OG/Randle, Jamal Murray, Towns, etc.

I totally agree we are not 23-58 bad but we also aren't much better than that. This team was the 7th worst team in the nba even when at full strength. There is a legit argument we can be the 7th worst team in the nba again unless there are MAJOR improvements this offseason.
User avatar
Scase
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 10,782
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Location: Ottawa by way of MTL
       

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1123 » by Scase » Fri Apr 5, 2024 5:58 pm

RoteSchroder wrote:
Tor_Raps wrote:
TimeForChange wrote:raps were what 8-14 with a healthy IQ/RJ/Scottie/Poeltl and 6-11 after the pascal trade and before scottie got hurt.

but don't let facts get in the way at projecting a 40 win season next year :lol:


People actually think that the Raptors will be the only team that is allowed to improve this offseason while everyone else will stay the same or get worse loll.


Poeltl only played in 14 games after the Siakam trade where they went 6-8. In two of those losses RJ was out. Scottie got injured in a 3rd loss against GSW. Meaning we went 6-5 without injuries.

After the OG trade, Raptors were 3-1 with the new group + Siakam before a Poeltl injury. Bringing us to 9-6.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/p/poeltja01/gamelog/2024

Edward Rogers just straight up lying with those stats , I’m assuming cause he wants Masai out of the picture.

Sure is a good thing only the Raptors ever deal with injuries right?

And those 6 wins?

CHA
HOU
BRK
ATL
IND
CHA

So again, just like post trade last year, we only beat bad teams, and in this case a single win against the pacers. Oh also the hornets didn't have Lamelo or Hayward, the Rockets didnt have FVV, so I guess by your metrics, those 3 wins don't count. So we went 3-5.

But it's all good, so long as we never have any injuries, and we play primarily sub .500 teams, we might sniff 40 wins.
Image
Props TZ!
ArthurVandelay
Head Coach
Posts: 6,563
And1: 6,302
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
 

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1124 » by ArthurVandelay » Fri Apr 5, 2024 6:07 pm

Tor_Raps wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:
Tor_Raps wrote:
Think my point was pretty clear to anyone (maybe not you) that wants to use injuries as an excuse as to why we sucked this year lol.

I think it is pretty indisputable to bring up injuries for this teams current iteration.

Our starting lineup of IQ/RJ/Barnes/Poeltl has played literally 234 minutes together over 14 games (7-7) and that was with tons of player movement going on and what not every 2 games it felt like. Pretty sure at least one of those games was the one Scottie got hurt and barely played to.

Like we are bad - but far from 23-58 bad or whatever we even are at this point :lol:


Only the Raptors fanbase will talk about a Poeltl injury when other teams are missing guys like Embiid/Maxey, OG/Randle, Jamal Murray, Towns, etc.

I totally agree we are not 23-58 bad but we also aren't much better than that. This team was the 7th worst team in the nba even when at full strength. There is a legit argument we can be the 7th worst team in the nba again unless there are MAJOR improvements this offseason.


Other teams have better depth. That’s why some in the Raptors fan base use injuries as an excuse because the Raptors don’t have depth.

Not directing this at you, depth gets thrown around a lot but I’m not sure people actually understand the significance. Depth is having legit NBA players as back ups and third stringers. Guys who could legitimately start on some teams. Depth is why the Raptors actually had a higher winning percentage in 2019-2020 before season halted. Depth is why load management had little regular season impact with Kawhi in 2018-2019.

Depth gets you to the playoffs while elite talent wins you the playoffs. Right now the Raptors have neither and a long way to go to have either.
Tor_Raps
RealGM
Posts: 32,507
And1: 47,263
Joined: Oct 14, 2018

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1125 » by Tor_Raps » Fri Apr 5, 2024 6:22 pm

ArthurVandelay wrote:
Tor_Raps wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:I think it is pretty indisputable to bring up injuries for this teams current iteration.

Our starting lineup of IQ/RJ/Barnes/Poeltl has played literally 234 minutes together over 14 games (7-7) and that was with tons of player movement going on and what not every 2 games it felt like. Pretty sure at least one of those games was the one Scottie got hurt and barely played to.

Like we are bad - but far from 23-58 bad or whatever we even are at this point :lol:


Only the Raptors fanbase will talk about a Poeltl injury when other teams are missing guys like Embiid/Maxey, OG/Randle, Jamal Murray, Towns, etc.

I totally agree we are not 23-58 bad but we also aren't much better than that. This team was the 7th worst team in the nba even when at full strength. There is a legit argument we can be the 7th worst team in the nba again unless there are MAJOR improvements this offseason.


Other teams have better depth. That’s why some in the Raptors fan base use injuries as an excuse because the Raptors don’t have depth.

Not directing this at you, depth gets thrown around a lot but I’m not sure people actually understand the significance. Depth is having legit NBA players as back ups and third stringers. Guys who could legitimately start on some teams. Depth is why the Raptors actually had a higher winning percentage in 2019-2020 before season halted. Depth is why load management had little regular season impact with Kawhi in 2018-2019.

Depth gets you to the playoffs while elite talent wins you the playoffs. Right now the Raptors have neither and a long way to go to have either.


This has been exactly my point. Well said!
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,672
And1: 33,335
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1126 » by YogurtProducer » Fri Apr 5, 2024 8:19 pm

Tor_Raps wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:
Tor_Raps wrote:
Think my point was pretty clear to anyone (maybe not you) that wants to use injuries as an excuse as to why we sucked this year lol.

I think it is pretty indisputable to bring up injuries for this teams current iteration.

Our starting lineup of IQ/RJ/Barnes/Poeltl has played literally 234 minutes together over 14 games (7-7) and that was with tons of player movement going on and what not every 2 games it felt like. Pretty sure at least one of those games was the one Scottie got hurt and barely played to.

Like we are bad - but far from 23-58 bad or whatever we even are at this point :lol:


Only the Raptors fanbase will talk about a Poeltl injury when other teams are missing guys like Embiid/Maxey, OG/Randle, Jamal Murray, Towns, etc.

I totally agree we are not 23-58 bad but we also aren't much better than that. This team was the 7th worst team in the nba even when at full strength. There is a legit argument we can be the 7th worst team in the nba again unless there are MAJOR improvements this offseason.

Sixers - 28-8 when he plays, 14-27 when Embiid does not play
Knicks - 15-2 with OG and 13-14 without OG (since trade)
Knicks - 29-17 with Randle, 16-15 without
Nuggets - 40-14 with Jamal, 14-10 without
Wolves - 41-19 with Towns, 12-4 without

So outside of Minnesota, every other has been pretty mediocre without those guys anyways so not sure what your point is

And besides, we played how many games recently without Barnes/Poeltl/IQ/RJ? Take away the top 4 from literally any NBA team and they are god awful
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,672
And1: 33,335
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1127 » by YogurtProducer » Fri Apr 5, 2024 8:22 pm

ArthurVandelay wrote:
Tor_Raps wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:I think it is pretty indisputable to bring up injuries for this teams current iteration.

Our starting lineup of IQ/RJ/Barnes/Poeltl has played literally 234 minutes together over 14 games (7-7) and that was with tons of player movement going on and what not every 2 games it felt like. Pretty sure at least one of those games was the one Scottie got hurt and barely played to.

Like we are bad - but far from 23-58 bad or whatever we even are at this point :lol:


Only the Raptors fanbase will talk about a Poeltl injury when other teams are missing guys like Embiid/Maxey, OG/Randle, Jamal Murray, Towns, etc.

I totally agree we are not 23-58 bad but we also aren't much better than that. This team was the 7th worst team in the nba even when at full strength. There is a legit argument we can be the 7th worst team in the nba again unless there are MAJOR improvements this offseason.


Other teams have better depth. That’s why some in the Raptors fan base use injuries as an excuse because the Raptors don’t have depth.

Not directing this at you, depth gets thrown around a lot but I’m not sure people actually understand the significance. Depth is having legit NBA players as back ups and third stringers. Guys who could legitimately start on some teams. Depth is why the Raptors actually had a higher winning percentage in 2019-2020 before season halted. Depth is why load management had little regular season impact with Kawhi in 2018-2019.

Depth gets you to the playoffs while elite talent wins you the playoffs. Right now the Raptors have neither and a long way to go to have either.

We have okay depth now, 1000% better depth than we had since 2021.

Gary started for us in 2022, and our bench was Thad/Boucher/Achiwua/Birch. That team somehow won 48 games.

The fact Gary/Olynyk/Brown/Dick are all guys we can bring off the bench now is light and day different. We could also end up bringing in 2-3 rookies and if any of them even make a slight impact as a 10th man that would be a boost.

The 2022 team winning 48 games and realistically the same team (plus Poeltl less FVV) winning like 25-30 games this year just shows that looking at a roster year over year and expecting the same results is poor analysis. Same as our 2013 team winning 34 games and 2024 winning 48.
ArthurVandelay
Head Coach
Posts: 6,563
And1: 6,302
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
 

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1128 » by ArthurVandelay » Fri Apr 5, 2024 8:37 pm

YogurtProducer wrote:
ArthurVandelay wrote:
Tor_Raps wrote:
Only the Raptors fanbase will talk about a Poeltl injury when other teams are missing guys like Embiid/Maxey, OG/Randle, Jamal Murray, Towns, etc.

I totally agree we are not 23-58 bad but we also aren't much better than that. This team was the 7th worst team in the nba even when at full strength. There is a legit argument we can be the 7th worst team in the nba again unless there are MAJOR improvements this offseason.


Other teams have better depth. That’s why some in the Raptors fan base use injuries as an excuse because the Raptors don’t have depth.

Not directing this at you, depth gets thrown around a lot but I’m not sure people actually understand the significance. Depth is having legit NBA players as back ups and third stringers. Guys who could legitimately start on some teams. Depth is why the Raptors actually had a higher winning percentage in 2019-2020 before season halted. Depth is why load management had little regular season impact with Kawhi in 2018-2019.

Depth gets you to the playoffs while elite talent wins you the playoffs. Right now the Raptors have neither and a long way to go to have either.

We have okay depth now, 1000% better depth than we had since 2021.

Gary started for us in 2022, and our bench was Thad/Boucher/Achiwua/Birch. That team somehow won 48 games.

The fact Gary/Olynyk/Brown/Dick are all guys we can bring off the bench now is light and day different. We could also end up bringing in 2-3 rookies and if any of them even make a slight impact as a 10th man that would be a boost.

The 2022 team winning 48 games and realistically the same team (plus Poeltl less FVV) winning like 25-30 games this year just shows that looking at a roster year over year and expecting the same results is poor analysis. Same as our 2013 team winning 34 games and 2024 winning 48.


I don’t think that Gary/KO/Brown/Dick is good depth…but that’s just me. They all have significant holes in their game in some way and the only one has a chance to improve at this point is the skinny rook. The fact they are better than recent years is more of an indictment on those recent years.

As for the 48 win season, I think it was the style of play that caught a lot of teams off guard but the counter game plan was eventually figured out. Plus it was an extremely difficult style of play to sustain and needed total buy in from players. The individual competing interests from the coaches down to the players ensured it was a short lived success.
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,672
And1: 33,335
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1129 » by YogurtProducer » Fri Apr 5, 2024 9:32 pm

ArthurVandelay wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:
ArthurVandelay wrote:
Other teams have better depth. That’s why some in the Raptors fan base use injuries as an excuse because the Raptors don’t have depth.

Not directing this at you, depth gets thrown around a lot but I’m not sure people actually understand the significance. Depth is having legit NBA players as back ups and third stringers. Guys who could legitimately start on some teams. Depth is why the Raptors actually had a higher winning percentage in 2019-2020 before season halted. Depth is why load management had little regular season impact with Kawhi in 2018-2019.

Depth gets you to the playoffs while elite talent wins you the playoffs. Right now the Raptors have neither and a long way to go to have either.

We have okay depth now, 1000% better depth than we had since 2021.

Gary started for us in 2022, and our bench was Thad/Boucher/Achiwua/Birch. That team somehow won 48 games.

The fact Gary/Olynyk/Brown/Dick are all guys we can bring off the bench now is light and day different. We could also end up bringing in 2-3 rookies and if any of them even make a slight impact as a 10th man that would be a boost.

The 2022 team winning 48 games and realistically the same team (plus Poeltl less FVV) winning like 25-30 games this year just shows that looking at a roster year over year and expecting the same results is poor analysis. Same as our 2013 team winning 34 games and 2024 winning 48.


I don’t think that Gary/KO/Brown/Dick is good depth…but that’s just me. They all have significant holes in their game in some way and the only one has a chance to improve at this point is the skinny rook. The fact they are better than recent years is more of an indictment on those recent years.

As for the 48 win season, I think it was the style of play that caught a lot of teams off guard but the counter game plan was eventually figured out. Plus it was an extremely difficult style of play to sustain and needed total buy in from players. The individual competing interests from the coaches down to the players ensured it was a short lived success.

How is that not good depth? Do you see what other teams bring off their bench?

2023 Nuggets - Bruce Brown / Jeff Green / Christian Braun was their playoff bench
2022 Warriors - Poole / Looney / Otto / GPII
2021 Bucks - Connaughton / Portis / BRYN FORBES

These were championship teams also. Trent / Olynyk / Brown is already a real good bench. It is actually eye opening how little talents most benches have
billy_hoyle
Starter
Posts: 2,469
And1: 1,587
Joined: Jun 16, 2008

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1130 » by billy_hoyle » Fri Apr 5, 2024 9:38 pm

Huge night tonight for all our picks.

Indy vs OKC
Memphis vs Detroit
Blazers vs Wizards
Various other Indy jockeying teams (Heat, Warriors, Magic, Knicks, Kings, Pelicans and Suns).

We can gain ground on the Blazers, maintain 31, and have Indy fall back towards the playin.

Only a half dozen games remain. Our tank gets pretty spicy if the Blazers win tonight. Only two games back of a coin flip.
JB7
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,396
And1: 2,025
Joined: Jun 03, 2002

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1131 » by JB7 » Fri Apr 5, 2024 9:38 pm

ArthurVandelay wrote:
Tor_Raps wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:I think it is pretty indisputable to bring up injuries for this teams current iteration.

Our starting lineup of IQ/RJ/Barnes/Poeltl has played literally 234 minutes together over 14 games (7-7) and that was with tons of player movement going on and what not every 2 games it felt like. Pretty sure at least one of those games was the one Scottie got hurt and barely played to.

Like we are bad - but far from 23-58 bad or whatever we even are at this point :lol:


Only the Raptors fanbase will talk about a Poeltl injury when other teams are missing guys like Embiid/Maxey, OG/Randle, Jamal Murray, Towns, etc.

I totally agree we are not 23-58 bad but we also aren't much better than that. This team was the 7th worst team in the nba even when at full strength. There is a legit argument we can be the 7th worst team in the nba again unless there are MAJOR improvements this offseason.


Other teams have better depth. That’s why some in the Raptors fan base use injuries as an excuse because the Raptors don’t have depth.

Not directing this at you, depth gets thrown around a lot but I’m not sure people actually understand the significance. Depth is having legit NBA players as back ups and third stringers. Guys who could legitimately start on some teams. Depth is why the Raptors actually had a higher winning percentage in 2019-2020 before season halted. Depth is why load management had little regular season impact with Kawhi in 2018-2019.

Depth gets you to the playoffs while elite talent wins you the playoffs. Right now the Raptors have neither and a long way to go to have either.


This myth that other teams have a lot of depth needs to be examined more. Because of salary cap constraints, most teams are only 6-7 players deep (referring to players making $10M+). Outside of the Clippers and Warriors spending a fortune on their roster, and holding onto a lot of vets, most teams cannot afford that approach. The only other team that has built up depth is OKC, because they have so many damn draft picks, but even that depth will be tested once they have to start paying all of their stars. Yes they will still have a lot of draft picks, but as the money dries up, even paying high draft picks can be costly.
User avatar
Scase
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 10,782
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Location: Ottawa by way of MTL
       

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1132 » by Scase » Fri Apr 5, 2024 9:48 pm

ArthurVandelay wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:
ArthurVandelay wrote:
Other teams have better depth. That’s why some in the Raptors fan base use injuries as an excuse because the Raptors don’t have depth.

Not directing this at you, depth gets thrown around a lot but I’m not sure people actually understand the significance. Depth is having legit NBA players as back ups and third stringers. Guys who could legitimately start on some teams. Depth is why the Raptors actually had a higher winning percentage in 2019-2020 before season halted. Depth is why load management had little regular season impact with Kawhi in 2018-2019.

Depth gets you to the playoffs while elite talent wins you the playoffs. Right now the Raptors have neither and a long way to go to have either.

We have okay depth now, 1000% better depth than we had since 2021.

Gary started for us in 2022, and our bench was Thad/Boucher/Achiwua/Birch. That team somehow won 48 games.

The fact Gary/Olynyk/Brown/Dick are all guys we can bring off the bench now is light and day different. We could also end up bringing in 2-3 rookies and if any of them even make a slight impact as a 10th man that would be a boost.

The 2022 team winning 48 games and realistically the same team (plus Poeltl less FVV) winning like 25-30 games this year just shows that looking at a roster year over year and expecting the same results is poor analysis. Same as our 2013 team winning 34 games and 2024 winning 48.


I don’t think that Gary/KO/Brown/Dick is good depth…but that’s just me. They all have significant holes in their game in some way and the only one has a chance to improve at this point is the skinny rook. The fact they are better than recent years is more of an indictment on those recent years.

As for the 48 win season, I think it was the style of play that caught a lot of teams off guard but the counter game plan was eventually figured out. Plus it was an extremely difficult style of play to sustain and needed total buy in from players. The individual competing interests from the coaches down to the players ensured it was a short lived success.

I can't imagine most people who actually watch basketball would actually consider that depth.

GTJ is the most productive of the bunch, Dick has the most potential. But outside of that we have Brown who absolutely requires a better team to be better, and then KO who is by no stretch bad, but he's getting older and can't play defence to save his life.

GTJ is at best a 6th man off the bench, he is not a legit starter, he's way too streaky for that. Dick likely will be, but that's probably a couple years away. This team is as shallow as a puddle. We could maybe manage an injury to RJ with GTJ/Dick, but if any other starter goes down, the team is in for a world of hurt. Who the hell replaces Scottie at even 50% performance, or IQ? And even Jak who I am not super high on, is hard to replace with this roster.

We don't even have a competent bench unit, let alone the ability to have a "next man up" type of situation occur. It ain't 2017/18, or even close.
Image
Props TZ!
mihaic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,768
And1: 3,909
Joined: Jul 05, 2006
   

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1133 » by mihaic » Fri Apr 5, 2024 10:30 pm

When the top talent is out, even better teams like Philly falter.

Memphis is the same without Ja.
It is not an excuse, it is a fact.

Only the Cavs are worse when at full strength :)
User avatar
PD28
General Manager
Posts: 8,907
And1: 13,978
Joined: Jan 04, 2013
 

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1134 » by PD28 » Fri Apr 5, 2024 11:04 pm

Anyone else think its funny that Spurs fans are disgusted with our tank, while they have 18 wins on the season with the DPOY/ROY on their team? Pop knows they are good enough to win more games but is purposely losing for their future as well LOL
Image
metafisical
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,963
And1: 6,072
Joined: Jun 13, 2014
     

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1135 » by metafisical » Fri Apr 5, 2024 11:48 pm

PD28 wrote:Anyone else think its funny that Spurs fans are disgusted with our tank, while they have 18 wins on the season with the DPOY/ROY on their team? Pop knows they are good enough to win more games but is purposely losing for their future as well LOL


Who cares what Spurs fans think? They can cry all they want. The only opinions I care about are the collective Raptor fan base and NBA front office, who have the power to penalize the Raptors for our "blatant" tank.
I acknowledge and thank the lək̓ʷəŋən peoples of the Songhees, Esquimalt and W̱SÁNEĆ First Nations for allowing me to live, work and play on their unceded traditional territories.
User avatar
Coco Costanza
Analyst
Posts: 3,661
And1: 6,647
Joined: Jan 13, 2018
   

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1136 » by Coco Costanza » Fri Apr 5, 2024 11:48 pm

Pacers would have to play OKC without SGA... :nonono:
Antinomy wrote:Bucks are going to win the next 2 games (convincingly). This place is gonna be a wasteland :lol:

In the words of Charles Barkley: I Guar-RUN-tee.

You are all welcome to sig me.
User avatar
SFour
RealGM
Posts: 41,210
And1: 61,572
Joined: Apr 07, 2012
   

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1137 » by SFour » Fri Apr 5, 2024 11:51 pm

PD28 wrote:Anyone else think its funny that Spurs fans are disgusted with our tank, while they have 18 wins on the season with the DPOY/ROY on their team? Pop knows they are good enough to win more games but is purposely losing for their future as well LOL


it doesn't make sense for them to be so salty, because the pick is a coin toss....I would be happy if I was them.
User avatar
LoveMyRaps
RealGM
Posts: 29,729
And1: 50,141
Joined: Jun 10, 2013
       

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1138 » by LoveMyRaps » Sat Apr 6, 2024 12:21 am

Pacers won. SMH.
In Masai We Trust :meditate:
Image
User avatar
Coco Costanza
Analyst
Posts: 3,661
And1: 6,647
Joined: Jan 13, 2018
   

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1139 » by Coco Costanza » Sat Apr 6, 2024 12:32 am

LoveMyRaps wrote:Pacers won. SMH.


It's in the third quarter. :-?
Antinomy wrote:Bucks are going to win the next 2 games (convincingly). This place is gonna be a wasteland :lol:

In the words of Charles Barkley: I Guar-RUN-tee.

You are all welcome to sig me.
User avatar
PD28
General Manager
Posts: 8,907
And1: 13,978
Joined: Jan 04, 2013
 

Re: Pacers Pick Tracking 

Post#1140 » by PD28 » Sat Apr 6, 2024 12:34 am

Coco Costanza wrote:
LoveMyRaps wrote:Pacers won. SMH.


It's in the third quarter. :-?


A timetraveler has blessed us with knowledge to bet on this game!
Image

Return to Toronto Raptors