watch1958 wrote:SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:Minus 23 Moody is no savior. Plus 5 Klay is not the kiss of death.
What was -26 TJD?
Outperformed by Looney but why?
Moderators: Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose
watch1958 wrote:SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:Minus 23 Moody is no savior. Plus 5 Klay is not the kiss of death.
What was -26 TJD?
Maybe the lack of anyone to guard Kyrie, except some stretches of GP2SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:watch1958 wrote:SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:Minus 23 Moody is no savior. Plus 5 Klay is not the kiss of death.
What was -26 TJD?
Outperformed by Looney but why?
CDM_Stats wrote:Onus wrote:Also yes getting a wide open shot with .8 seconds left is as good of a shot you can ask for let alone for Klay.
on what planet? less than a second to catch the ball and then square up and shoot - borderline impossible. Teams have done much more with 4 seconds, to the Warriors, than the Warriors did tonight
Klay overall was fine but should be getting no blame for how the game ended. TJD and Kerr (I guess?) respectively blew the last 2 plays
I dusted off a defunct twitter account even for this:
Catch, turn his head, bend his knees, jump, release in a little under 0.8 seconds. Not even Steph is making that a good look
svart wrote:this board is turning into a pro/klay - anti/klay war, with every party rubbing it to the other depending on the type of game he has.
and it's disgusting.
michaelm wrote:svart wrote:this board is turning into a pro/klay - anti/klay war, with every party rubbing it to the other depending on the type of game he has.
and it's disgusting.
Yes, this is certainly not the game to call him out on, Moody hardly auditioned well to be his replacement as a starter.
michaelm wrote:svart wrote:this board is turning into a pro/klay - anti/klay war, with every party rubbing it to the other depending on the type of game he has.
and it's disgusting.
Yes, this is certainly not the game to call him out on, Moody hardly auditioned well to be his replacement as a starter. More an advertisement for the benefit to the team of good Wiggins I would have thought.
I am not a start Moody guy anyway, but I remain opposed to Klay being in for defensive possessions late in games when he is tired. Whatever makes the team win though, if Klay can win games late I am all for it.
svart wrote:this board is turning into a pro/klay - anti/klay war, with every party rubbing it to the other depending on the type of game he has.
and it's disgusting.
billinder33 wrote:michaelm wrote:svart wrote:this board is turning into a pro/klay - anti/klay war, with every party rubbing it to the other depending on the type of game he has.
and it's disgusting.
Yes, this is certainly not the game to call him out on, Moody hardly auditioned well to be his replacement as a starter.
I've never understood this board's fascination with Moody. We're all waiting for players to show they can take over for the faltering 'core', and in theory Moody should be in pole position for that honor,. But right now he's behind Podz, Wiggs, TJD, and JK. 3 years in, he's just mediocre/fine/ok with no defining skill to hang his hat on.
He just doesn't look much different than when he was drafted. Same body, slightly improved floor game, roughly the same shooting efficiency thanks to this season's decline. I'm not sure if it's because he doesn't work hard enough on his game or if he's capped by his athleticism. IMO there should be more growth than there has been. He's only 21 so the book isn't completely written, but at this point I'm not convinced that his game is going anywhere, and I don't think the issue is "Kerr" or "opportunity". Maybe year 4 will be different?
Still some upside hope I guess, but this is starting to look like an 'NBA warm body' career.
svart wrote:That was always the more probable path after the losses you mentions.
But some people got hyped by our winning streak and now they feel more disappointed than they should be.
We need to prove we deserve to be there by winning two games in the play-in. That's how i see it. is it doable? We'll need a lot of luck and heart. We'll see.
svart wrote:That was always the more probable path after the losses you mentions.
But some people got hyped by our winning streak and now they feel more disappointed than they should be.
We need to prove we deserve to be there by winning two games in the play-in. That's how i see it. is it doable? We'll need a lot of luck and heart. We'll see.
Return to Golden State Warriors