Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
- Matches Malone
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,628
- And1: 22,269
- Joined: Nov 23, 2005
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
- Matches Malone
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,628
- And1: 22,269
- Joined: Nov 23, 2005
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
- Matches Malone
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,628
- And1: 22,269
- Joined: Nov 23, 2005
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
- Matches Malone
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,628
- And1: 22,269
- Joined: Nov 23, 2005
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 102,012
- And1: 37,276
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,569
- And1: 3,436
- Joined: Jun 28, 2012
- Location: Appleton WI
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
Now that Jordan Love is extension eligible, how do you guys want his extension structured? Would you rather go the Jalen Hurts/Lamar Jackson route where the teams minimized the cap hits in the early years to try and go all in but then have massive cap hits on the back end, or would you rather go the more traditional route of spreading the cap hit fairly evenly across every year?
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,295
- And1: 1,542
- Joined: Oct 04, 2011
- Location: Riverwest
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
MVP2110 wrote:Now that Jordan Love is extension eligible, how do you guys want his extension structured? Would you rather go the Jalen Hurts/Lamar Jackson route where the teams minimized the cap hits in the early years to try and go all in but then have massive cap hits on the back end, or would you rather go the more traditional route of spreading the cap hit fairly evenly across every year?
I'd probably go the mahommes type route where there are lots of roster bonuses that guarantee each year and give a bigger yearly base, but then teams have the option to turn the bonuses and bases into signing bonuses and spread out over the length of the contract. This gives the team flexibility the first few years and also later on.
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,134
- And1: 7,417
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
MVP2110 wrote:Now that Jordan Love is extension eligible, how do you guys want his extension structured? Would you rather go the Jalen Hurts/Lamar Jackson route where the teams minimized the cap hits in the early years to try and go all in but then have massive cap hits on the back end, or would you rather go the more traditional route of spreading the cap hit fairly evenly across every year?
With the Rodgtiari disasters coming off the books, pay as much as you can up front. The team is a contender now so extend the window as long as possible.
Do it for Chuck
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,134
- And1: 7,417
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
ReasonablySober wrote:
If this was a vote, Love would come in third and I love that. Let people keep doubting him.
Do it for Chuck
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
- Matches Malone
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,628
- And1: 22,269
- Joined: Nov 23, 2005
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
- MoreTrife
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,557
- And1: 2,420
- Joined: Jun 14, 2014
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
I think he's going to have a monster year. MVP I'll say. Homerism but more solified line, a leap from rookies.
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,569
- And1: 3,436
- Joined: Jun 28, 2012
- Location: Appleton WI
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
There are some absolutely gorgeous throws in this video
?t=8EmJrWilAjXHoIBiGq-CBg&s=19
?t=8EmJrWilAjXHoIBiGq-CBg&s=19
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 980
- And1: 262
- Joined: Apr 06, 2014
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
M-C-G wrote:10 to 15 years ago it was the standard to sit a rookie 2 or 3 years and I think there were good reasons for it. I’d suspect if you isolated QBs drafted top 10, you’d find sitting is better but that’s just my guess.
For back half of 1st round or later, I’d bet the evidence supports more development prior to playing yields better results but just my gut feel.
So either way . . .
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
- M-C-G
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,067
- And1: 9,494
- Joined: Jan 13, 2013
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
nagawicka wrote:M-C-G wrote:10 to 15 years ago it was the standard to sit a rookie 2 or 3 years and I think there were good reasons for it. I’d suspect if you isolated QBs drafted top 10, you’d find sitting is better but that’s just my guess.
For back half of 1st round or later, I’d bet the evidence supports more development prior to playing yields better results but just my gut feel.
So either way . . .
Huh?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,346
- And1: 4,339
- Joined: May 06, 2014
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
How is him saying he thinks sitting is better an "either way"? lolnagawicka wrote:M-C-G wrote:10 to 15 years ago it was the standard to sit a rookie 2 or 3 years and I think there were good reasons for it. I’d suspect if you isolated QBs drafted top 10, you’d find sitting is better but that’s just my guess.
For back half of 1st round or later, I’d bet the evidence supports more development prior to playing yields better results but just my gut feel.
So either way . . .
Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,774
- And1: 7,151
- Joined: Sep 23, 2007
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
RRyder823 wrote:How is him saying he thinks sitting is better an "either way"? lolnagawicka wrote:M-C-G wrote:10 to 15 years ago it was the standard to sit a rookie 2 or 3 years and I think there were good reasons for it. I’d suspect if you isolated QBs drafted top 10, you’d find sitting is better but that’s just my guess.
For back half of 1st round or later, I’d bet the evidence supports more development prior to playing yields better results but just my gut feel.
So either way . . .
I think it's just because he seems to be drawing a contrast between top-10 QBs vs. QBs drafted later, but then comes to the conclusion that sitting is better for both groups, which means there's no need to draw a contrast.
Wut we've got here is... faaailure... to communakate.
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,167
- And1: 19,863
- Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
Would CJ Stoud be better this year had he not played last season?
Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app
Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 102,012
- And1: 37,276
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
WeekapaugGroove wrote:Would CJ Stoud be better this year had he not played last season?
Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app
Maybe?
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
- M-C-G
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,067
- And1: 9,494
- Joined: Jan 13, 2013
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
coolhandluke121 wrote:RRyder823 wrote:How is him saying he thinks sitting is better an "either way"? lolnagawicka wrote:So either way . . .
I think it's just because he seems to be drawing a contrast between top-10 QBs vs. QBs drafted later, but then comes to the conclusion that sitting is better for both groups, which means there's no need to draw a contrast.
Yeah I’d probably say a(not all but most) top 10 guy sits for a year where a late first or later may need two or three years. Again just a gut feeling
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 980
- And1: 262
- Joined: Apr 06, 2014
Re: Jordan Love Thread - All Aboard the Love Train
coolhandluke121 wrote:RRyder823 wrote:How is him saying he thinks sitting is better an "either way"? lolnagawicka wrote:So either way . . .
I think it's just because he seems to be drawing a contrast between top-10 QBs vs. QBs drafted later, but then comes to the conclusion that sitting is better for both groups, which means there's no need to draw a contrast.
Yah, early draft picks are better off sitting to develop, later round picks are better off sitting to develop. Training up your 7th round qb and training up your 1st round qb before unleashing 'em seems like sound practice.