Mitchell to San Francisco

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 16,028
And1: 4,159
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: Mitchell to San Francisco 

Post#21 » by daoneandonly » Wed Apr 10, 2024 5:36 pm

jayjaysee wrote:I take Wiggins/Kuminga over Kuzma/first. Probably for every single team in the league?

The problem for me is why would Mitchell agree to stay in Golden State if they did this trade? They’d be hard capped due to this traded have no firsts and 1-2 decent prospects and 2 stars that might have 2-3 years left..

So I can’t see golden state doing it.


Agreed, zero reason for Wash to be in this just to steal value
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,906
And1: 35,984
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Mitchell to San Francisco 

Post#22 » by jbk1234 » Wed Apr 10, 2024 6:39 pm

The number of Cavs fans willing to accept a non-shooter at SF back as the center piece in a Mitchell trade really surprises me. In his third season, Kuminga makes Okoro look like Klay Thompson.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
User avatar
Coxy
RealGM
Posts: 48,566
And1: 15,020
Joined: Jun 17, 2008
   

Re: Mitchell to San Francisco 

Post#23 » by Coxy » Wed Apr 10, 2024 9:38 pm

Not interested in this for GS for Mitchell.

Agree with others, no idea why Washington are in this trade.
parsnips33
Head Coach
Posts: 7,432
And1: 3,413
Joined: Sep 01, 2014
 

Re: Mitchell to San Francisco 

Post#24 » by parsnips33 » Wed Apr 10, 2024 10:05 pm

Generally think GSW should push in for a big wing who can play down a position or a versatile 5

That being said, I don't hate the idea of Mitchell considering he could be realistically available
Astaluego
Starter
Posts: 2,394
And1: 907
Joined: May 02, 2020
   

Re: Mitchell to San Francisco 

Post#25 » by Astaluego » Wed Apr 10, 2024 10:25 pm

I don't like the goal for the Warriors at all, it makes them even worse...that team would be an absolute disaster defensively...super small team with 0 full-size wings, and Looney keeps starting after burning all the assets. I think they could get someone like Lauri Markkanen to keep Wiggins and they would be better...
J.Grant for a fraction of the price..
Would the Pacers trade Turner for Kuminga+filler? (I think it's a good deal for both)
Old Mike Lorenzo
toooskies
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,167
And1: 2,508
Joined: Jul 18, 2013
     

Re: Mitchell to San Francisco 

Post#26 » by toooskies » Thu Apr 11, 2024 4:20 am

jbk1234 wrote:The number of Cavs fans willing to accept a non-shooter at SF back as the center piece in a Mitchell trade really surprises me. In his third season, Kuminga makes Okoro look like Klay Thompson.

Yeah, I'd definitely move Kuminga for, say, DFS+ from Brooklyn.

But Golden State has too many reasons to turn this one down to bother fleshing that out.
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 29,499
And1: 7,455
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: Mitchell to San Francisco 

Post#27 » by Crazy-Canuck » Thu Apr 11, 2024 6:01 am

If the goal is to dump wiggins at all cost, im sure a simpler deal around wiggins for thj can be had.
Warriors Analyst
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,871
And1: 2,705
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Mitchell to San Francisco 

Post#28 » by Warriors Analyst » Thu Apr 11, 2024 3:47 pm

Don't love the value for the Warriors. Ignoring that, the biggest problem with this deal is that the Warriors' defense would be horrific after this trade.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,642
And1: 6,306
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Mitchell to San Francisco 

Post#29 » by gswhoops » Thu Apr 11, 2024 4:58 pm

parsnips33 wrote:Generally think GSW should push in for a big wing who can play down a position or a versatile 5

That being said, I don't hate the idea of Mitchell considering he could be realistically available

Mitchell needs to be a PG (at least on defense) for a team that wants to seriously contend, and we already have a pretty good PG.
parsnips33
Head Coach
Posts: 7,432
And1: 3,413
Joined: Sep 01, 2014
 

Re: Mitchell to San Francisco 

Post#30 » by parsnips33 » Thu Apr 11, 2024 5:02 pm

gswhoops wrote:
parsnips33 wrote:Generally think GSW should push in for a big wing who can play down a position or a versatile 5

That being said, I don't hate the idea of Mitchell considering he could be realistically available

Mitchell needs to be a PG (at least on defense) for a team that wants to seriously contend, and we already have a pretty good PG.


Yeah defense would get screwed up - but getting a legit second option who can create for him self would be huge for the offense.

Just hoping Ainge gets tired of Markanen at this point :lol:
Warriorfan
RealGM
Posts: 15,357
And1: 2,801
Joined: Jun 24, 2001
         

Re: Mitchell to San Francisco 

Post#31 » by Warriorfan » Fri Apr 12, 2024 8:55 pm

Old Warrior core plus Mitchell is one Curry injury from being a lottery team so trading future 1sts isn't good team building.

Another warrior draft like the last one for GS, IMO they are dark horse contenders if Wiggins returns to old Warrior of hit 1 more 3 per plus don't miss gms.

Return to Trades and Transactions


cron