Clyde_Style wrote:
His comments are stupid and even his clueless, "I have no idea what to say" facial expressions match
I really hope they see Miami in the second round. Spo outcoaches him so badly.
Moderators: Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Capn'O, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, mpharris36, GONYK, HerSports85
Clyde_Style wrote:
His comments are stupid and even his clueless, "I have no idea what to say" facial expressions match
stuporman wrote:The end of that game made me realize the Knicks are so Brunson centric, once he's off they still struggle to run offense...that's going to be their weakness in the playoffs because it's such a severe drop off once he's not on the floor.
B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:aggo wrote:btw
the game was blown open with this lineup in the 2nd q
brunson
hart/precious
bogs
og
ihart
we're gonna see bogs more with the starters imo.
Yeah. I'm a Bogs believer - and I think Thibs is too. Just need to have 2 of hart/precious/og to compensate on hethe D. Maybe Mitch as well.
Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
TKKnicks1 wrote:Do we own the tiebreaker against the Bucks if we end up with the same record?
drekwins wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:
His comments are stupid and even his clueless, "I have no idea what to say" facial expressions match
I really hope they see Miami in the second round. Spo outcoaches him so badly.
8516knicks wrote:B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:aggo wrote:btw
the game was blown open with this lineup in the 2nd q
brunson
hart/precious
bogs
og
ihart
we're gonna see bogs more with the starters imo.
Yeah. I'm a Bogs believer - and I think Thibs is too. Just need to have 2 of hart/precious/og to compensate on hethe D. Maybe Mitch as well.
Mitch looked slow and stiff tonight. Not sure how much he'll help in playoffs aside from giving Ihart breathers.
Clyde_Style wrote:
His comments are stupid and even his clueless, "I have no idea what to say" facial expressions match
islanders11040 wrote:TKKnicks1 wrote:Do we own the tiebreaker against the Bucks if we end up with the same record?
nope. we gotta win out and they gotta lose out (2 games each)
TKKnicks1 wrote:Do we own the tiebreaker against the Bucks if we end up with the same record?
Clyde_Style wrote:islanders11040 wrote:TKKnicks1 wrote:Do we own the tiebreaker against the Bucks if we end up with the same record?
nope. we gotta win out and they gotta lose out (2 games each)
Only focus should be winning our two which guarantees us 3rd seed
TKKnicks1 wrote:Do we own the tiebreaker against the Bucks if we end up with the same record?
Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
8516knicks wrote:B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:aggo wrote:btw
the game was blown open with this lineup in the 2nd q
brunson
hart/precious
bogs
og
ihart
we're gonna see bogs more with the starters imo.
Yeah. I'm a Bogs believer - and I think Thibs is too. Just need to have 2 of hart/precious/og to compensate on hethe D. Maybe Mitch as well.
Mitch looked slow and stiff tonight. Not sure how much he'll help in playoffs aside from giving Ihart breathers.