Scoots1994 wrote:CDM_Stats wrote:Scoots1994 wrote:
If you are talking about replacing the coach of the team then how is "then who" a strawman argument? It's literally THE topic.
I think Kerr is a great coach, the problem is the coaches around him. He needs coaches around him that has a strong voice, who can work well with him, who has strong ideas of his own, who can manage the players, who is defensive minded. He has made some good choices and some bad choices for his assistants. The question to me isn't then who is going to replace Kerr, but rather who is Kerr going to hire to fill his staff? Mike Brown just lost his top assistant to the Nets so he's going to be pulling from the same pool too.
My guess is he hires someone like Monty Williams or Mike Budenholzer if they don't get a job elsewhere and want to coach this year.
For me the ideal would be Chris Quinn, and Kerr could realistically tell him that he would be setting him up to replace Kerr in 2 years.
Thank you for perfectly illustrating my point
That talking about who would coach is a strawman? It's literally not in a discussion about who should be coaching the team.
If your point is that we are far more clueless as outsiders ... that's what all sports talk among fans is, and you chose to come here.
That acting like anyone knows anything about other coaches actual styles is pointless, actually. For example, you created a scenario, answered it, and that was your reasoning. But it’s a scenario you created.. and why those 3 names, other than name recognition? What about the many deserving candidates who most have never heard of?
It’s all complete fanfic, so if someone’s counter to the idea that a HC change is needed is “I want names”.. why?