CDM_Stats wrote:Scotty2Hotty wrote:CDM_Stats wrote:
basketball math is a lot more complicated than the sum of players' PPGs but ok
You’re more exhilarated that Poole is gone than the addition of Paul. It’s fool’s gold.
I dont really care which one you think is more important,
its just one transaction where we got better short and long term, and the data bears that out. And when I say data, I mean actual data that points to winning, not just looking up stats on ESPN and doing some basic math
Wow we really got better short term with acquiring Chris Paul. And long term? How quickly will he and his absurd 28.4M for a 38-year old 2nd team PG be shuttle-trained out?
I guess you were right. We won a whopping two more games this season, ESPN stats, basic math & all not even needed.
Straight to the 10th seed and a one-game exit.
The data really bared that out.
Tried to tell you...fool’s gold. But nope...you didn't want to listen. Too stubborn to listen...stubborn much like your fav cheap-shot narcissist who once again...just couldn't help himself this season...12 games missed. 12 games that could have been given to a more level-headed trade averaging more than a triple single for the 6th season in a row.
But let's just bring he & CP3 back. Let's run this sh*t show back one more time. See if the data can manage to bear that out next season, both for the short and long term.