Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
-Jragon- wrote:Brook is shooting like 97% and people are still complaining when guys shoot running, floating 2s over him... they miss several too
MickeyDavis wrote:Brook had a good half overall. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
ShootingtheJ wrote:Mtsportsfan wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:
It's what's taught now.
If that's the case its stupid! You can challenge a shot without doing that!
Analytics show that NBA and college players are not affected by ground closeouts.
Baddy Chuck wrote:MickeyDavis wrote:Brook had a good half overall. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
He had some absolutely rough defensive possessions that led to guys you don't want shooting getting some pretty damn good looks.
Fotis St wrote:I am expecting Pacers get a 20p lead in the 3rd quarter. Khris pounding the ball more than 2 times should be counted as a turnover by itself. Maybe Gallo drops 30 points ... who knows
MuckyFingers wrote:They could post up Brook and score every single possession.
fansinceforever wrote:Obviously Brook isn't playing horribly but I think it's fair to comment on his limitations when they're continuously a problem
Eh...he's still a shooter and smart but his legs don't hardly move anymore.-Jragon- wrote:Btw Gallo not looking cooked is another thing I said since March so that's not hindsight either
MiltownMadness wrote:Baddy Chuck wrote:MickeyDavis wrote:Brook had a good half overall. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
He had some absolutely rough defensive possessions that led to guys you don't want shooting getting some pretty damn good looks.
Doesn't really matter, can't afford Brook being out. We can't rebound or defend the rim if he is out, only big
MiltownMadness wrote:fansinceforever wrote:Obviously Brook isn't playing horribly but I think it's fair to comment on his limitations when they're continuously a problem
But like come on, he is expected to be our 2nd best player to win a playoff game. I'd say he is doing great all things considered. Bucks crumbled when he sat
-Jragon- wrote:Btw Gallo not looking cooked is another thing I said since March so that's not hindsight either
MiltownMadness wrote:Baddy Chuck wrote:MickeyDavis wrote:Brook had a good half overall. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
He had some absolutely rough defensive possessions that led to guys you don't want shooting getting some pretty damn good looks.
Doesn't really matter, can't afford Brook being out. We can't rebound or defend the rim if he is out, only big
jute2003 wrote:Eh...he's still a shooter and smart but his legs don't hardly move anymore.-Jragon- wrote:Btw Gallo not looking cooked is another thing I said since March so that's not hindsight either
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:MiltownMadness wrote:Baddy Chuck wrote:He had some absolutely rough defensive possessions that led to guys you don't want shooting getting some pretty damn good looks.
Doesn't really matter, can't afford Brook being out. We can't rebound or defend the rim if he is out, only big
not to mention by far our 2nd best offensive threat
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
raysbookclub wrote:Why did it take a Giannis injury, a Dame injury, and a Portis ejection to get AJJ and Green more minutes??
