Invictus88 wrote:
I mean I wasn't the only one who took it that way. Snakebites did as well?
And that quote doesn't imply what you just stated. It's saying that the person had no choice but decide between two bad outcomes: die/quit what you love or be villified for continuing on. If you believe that about Dumars then you can view him as a victim of circumstance and partially absolve him for how things turned out.
But Dumars choosing to stick around much longer wasn't why he was villified. It's what he chose to do with that time afterward that mattered. And that was up to him.
I'm not posting about this further. Either you will understand or you won't but I've tried to explain too much already.
I explained myself several times and you keep twisting my words, not sure what the issue is.
I said a million times that he was villified justifiably so because he made horrible moves for many years and I haven't absolved him of ****, what are you not understanding or are you purposely being obtuse?
The quote was merely a fun callback to the Batman movie and I actually clarified my stance, multiple times, so you can take it as you want or actually read what I posted, it's up to you as I've explained it CLEARLY enough times already that again I am NOT (NOT!!!) absolving him of the mistakes he made.