toooskies wrote:He was vocal ten years ago on that, that it's a bad example for other superstars in their prime to take less money.
As a player who's still playing after 99% of the league would've already retired and he's the only player in history to be performing as close to his peak at his age, he has no one left to be setting an example for.
That said-- Cleveland would surely throw in LeVert, Niang, and Jerome to meet LeBron's salary expectations. Possibly with compensation. Maybe even Strus.
Again, when LeBron actually takes a substantial paycut we can discuss the possibility. Until then, it's just a stretch at best.
The problem isn't just matching salaries. There's just no incentive for the Lakers to take back useless salary in return. At the very least, if LeBron walks they dip under the luxury tax threshold. So unless they're getting something useful in return in order to pivot for a co-star for Anthony Davis, they'd almost be better off letting him walk rather than taking useless money and not receiving anything in return that they can use long-term.