Kispert + #26 = what pick?

TGW · Post #1 » by **TGW** » Sat May 18, 2024 5:08 pm

What's the best pick the Wizards could get for this package? I know there are teams in the teens that desperately need shooting. Ideally somewhere in the 8-12 range would be nice. Are there any teams that would be interested?

psman2 · Post #2 » by **psman2** » Sat May 18, 2024 5:15 pm

I don't think there is any chance of 8-12. I don't think Kispert is going to move you up more than 6-8 slots. Kispert is a nice floor player and likely is a end of rotation player for a long while in the league. But teams are usually willing to take a swing versus locking in that floor.

Colbinii · Post #3 » by **Colbinii** » Sat May 18, 2024 5:18 pm

Maybe #20 if a team likes Kispert?

I could see Cleveland and Phoenix interested [#20 and #22]. Maybe New Orleans at #21 if they move C.J.

Godaddycurse · Post #4 » by **Godaddycurse** » Sat May 18, 2024 5:18 pm

Kispert need a new contract in a year. i think you're lucky to even get a late 1st for him so i'd have that package at around 20-22

Colbinii · Post #5 » by **Colbinii** » Sat May 18, 2024 5:19 pm

Godaddycurse wrote:Kispert need a new contract in a year. i think you're lucky to even get a late 1st for him so i'd have that package at around 20-22

I listed each team 20-22 :lol:

Post #6 » by **gswhoops** » Sat May 18, 2024 5:29 pm

Maybe the Lakers give you 17 if they don’t love whoever’s on the board? Thats about as high as I can see

ferk · Post #7 » by **ferk** » Sat May 18, 2024 9:43 pm

Maybe a deal with the grizz but swapping 27 for 9 takes quite a bit more than Kispert.

BarbaGrizz · Post #8 » by **BarbaGrizz** » Sat May 18, 2024 10:23 pm

ferk wrote:Maybe a deal with the grizz but swapping 27 for 9 takes quite a bit more than Kispert.

Kennard + Ziaire + #9 for Avidjia

TGW · Post #9 » by **TGW** » Sat May 18, 2024 10:26 pm

BarbaGrizz wrote:
ferk wrote:Maybe a deal with the grizz but swapping 27 for 9 takes quite a bit more than Kispert.

Kennard + Ziaire + #9 for Avidjia

Take out Avidja, make it Kuzma and it's a deal.

jibba jones · Post #10 » by **jibba jones** » Sat May 18, 2024 10:29 pm

Thinking the Magic would give you 18

Just ask for their 2nd and they would add that too...

7r5ur · Post #11 » by **7r5ur** » Sat May 18, 2024 11:48 pm

TGW wrote:
BarbaGrizz wrote:
ferk wrote:Maybe a deal with the grizz but swapping 27 for 9 takes quite a bit more than Kispert.

Kennard + Ziaire + #9 for Avidjia

Take out Avidja, make it Kuzma and it's a deal.

Then take out #9 and put in #58 and it's closer

schaffy · Post #12 » by **schaffy** » Sun May 19, 2024 12:08 am

TGW wrote:
BarbaGrizz wrote:
ferk wrote:Maybe a deal with the grizz but swapping 27 for 9 takes quite a bit more than Kispert.

Kennard + Ziaire + #9 for Avidjia

Take out Avidja, make it Kuzma and it's a deal.

Is this a serious response or just an over the top response? Cause I don't see anyway Kuzma is worth 9, let alone 9 plus a few things.

Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app

TGW · Post #13 » by **TGW** » Sun May 19, 2024 12:23 am

schaffy wrote:
TGW wrote:
BarbaGrizz wrote:
Kennard + Ziaire + #9 for Avidjia

Take out Avidja, make it Kuzma and it's a deal.
Is this a serious response or just an over the top response? Cause I don't see anyway Kuzma is worth 9, let alone 9 plus a few things.

Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app

And I don't know how the #9 and what I feel is junk filler is remotely worth Avidja. See how easy that is? Oh and I think Kuzma for #9 in one of the weakest drafts in memory isn't that far off at all. The #9 in this draft is like #18-20 in a good draft.

Devilanche · Post #14 » by **Devilanche** » Sun May 19, 2024 12:30 am

TGW wrote:
schaffy wrote:
TGW wrote:
Take out Avidja, make it Kuzma and it's a deal.
Is this a serious response or just an over the top response? Cause I don't see anyway Kuzma is worth 9, let alone 9 plus a few things.

Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app

And I don't know how the #9 and what I feel is junk filler is remotely worth Avidja. See how easy that is? Oh and I think Kuzma for #9 in one of the weakest drafts in memory isn't that far off at all. The #9 in this draft is like #18-20 in a good draft.

#9 is still a lot closer to Deni than kuzma is a lot closer to #9 .

More potential of bust for sure than previous drafts but no where close to 18-20 in a good draft.

Dat2U · Post #15 » by **Dat2U** » Sun May 19, 2024 11:12 am

Colbinii wrote:Maybe #20 if a team likes Kispert?

I could see Cleveland and Phoenix interested [#20 and #22]. Maybe New Orleans at #21 if they move C.J.

I seriously doubt the Wizards move off a Kispert just to move up 4-5 spots in this draft. That doesn't make a ton of sense from the Wizards perspective when the cupboard is already bare.

Dat2U · Post #16 » by **Dat2U** » Sun May 19, 2024 11:15 am

schaffy wrote:
TGW wrote:
BarbaGrizz wrote:
Kennard + Ziaire + #9 for Avidjia

Take out Avidja, make it Kuzma and it's a deal.
Is this a serious response or just an over the top response? Cause I don't see anyway Kuzma is worth 9, let alone 9 plus a few things.

Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app

GMs talking about this draft is like drafting Tobias Harris at #1 yet Deni Avdija on one of the best contracts in the league is only worth a late lottery pick & cap filler. Make it make sense!

schaffy · Post #17 » by **schaffy** » Sun May 19, 2024 12:05 pm

Dat2U wrote:
schaffy wrote:
TGW wrote:
Take out Avidja, make it Kuzma and it's a deal.
Is this a serious response or just an over the top response? Cause I don't see anyway Kuzma is worth 9, let alone 9 plus a few things.

Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app

GMs talking about this draft is like drafting Tobias Harris at #1 yet Deni Avdija on one of the best contracts in the league is only worth a late lottery pick & cap filler. Make it make sense!

Yeah the top of the draft doesn't look to have any star level prospects. Thats why everyone says its a bad draft, because the teams that need big time level players arent going to find someone that fits that bill. But it also looks pretty flat with a number of player's that profile as at least rotation level players.

Also I said nothing about Avidja for 9 being good or fair. I only questioned Kuzma for it.

Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app

Post #18 » by **Scoot McGroot** » Sun May 19, 2024 12:12 pm

Dat2U wrote:
schaffy wrote:
TGW wrote:
Take out Avidja, make it Kuzma and it's a deal.
Is this a serious response or just an over the top response? Cause I don't see anyway Kuzma is worth 9, let alone 9 plus a few things.

Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app

GMs talking about this draft is like drafting Tobias Harris at #1 yet Deni Avdija on one of the best contracts in the league is only worth a late lottery pick & cap filler. Make it make sense!

Well, a Tobias not on a max contract in the last decade has been a pretty good player, right? So, put a Tobias Harris on a rookie contract for 4 years, and restricted free agency (so a path to team control for u to another 5 years), and that’s a pretty valuable player/contract, no?

Dat2U · Post #19 » by **Dat2U** » Sun May 19, 2024 12:21 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
schaffy wrote:Is this a serious response or just an over the top response? Cause I don't see anyway Kuzma is worth 9, let alone 9 plus a few things.

Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app

GMs talking about this draft is like drafting Tobias Harris at #1 yet Deni Avdija on one of the best contracts in the league is only worth a late lottery pick & cap filler. Make it make sense!

Well, a Tobias not on a max contract in the last decade has been a pretty good player, right? So, put a Tobias Harris on a rookie contract for 4 years, and restricted free agency (so a path to team control for u to another 5 years), and that’s a pretty valuable player/contract, no?

If your looking at it from that perspective it's only valuable for the rookie deal because the next 5 years are going to be wildly overpaid.

Colbinii · Post #20 » by **Colbinii** » Sun May 19, 2024 12:46 pm

Dat2U wrote:
Colbinii wrote:Maybe #20 if a team likes Kispert?

I could see Cleveland and Phoenix interested [#20 and #22]. Maybe New Orleans at #21 if they move C.J.

I seriously doubt the Wizards move off a Kispert just to move up 4-5 spots in this draft. That doesn't make a ton of sense from the Wizards perspective when the cupboard is already bare.

I'm just giving you 29 perspectives