Duke4life831 wrote:This is the trouble that Denver put themselves into.
Jokic puts up 34/19/7 (on 28 shots) and one of the takeaways is Jokic didn’t play well enough and took too many 3s.
The thing is, I do agree with that take. You could tell he was trying to conserve energy because he was in line for a 47 minute game.
But that’s the thing 34/19/7 on just 54 TS% isn’t good enough. He needed that stat line but with like 65 TS%. We’ve seen him do it before, so we know he can do it.
But Jokic really is the only guy since probably early LeBron or that LeBron Cavs run when everyone got hurt, that we expect to put up these kinds of games.
That’s just not a winning formula. Ya Murray had a good game, but he still finished out these playoffs with more FGAs than points (47 TS% for the playoffs). Your banking on a non all star player to repeatedly step up to All NBA level each year in the playoffs. That doesn’t seem like the best gameplan. Again ya he had a good game tonight (mainly 1st half). But if he played better earlier in the series (like in game 1), good chance Denver doesn’t have to play a game 7.
I’ll say this. I don’t think Jokic’s teammates failed him. I think Minny had the level of defense where outside of Jokic, the rest of the players played like what you could expect from role players against a good defense in the playoffs.
The way this team was built is what failed them this playoff. And all the props to Minny and their defense for that. Denver didn’t have a true #2 star that could consistently put pressure on that defense and Minny just pressured them to death essentially.
I think you have to make trades because the other contenders are only getting better. And Murray has great trade value.
But this was Denver's best season yet with 57 wins (in Jokic's Nuggets era). A lot of that has to do with Murray's two man game with Jokic.
Early on in the season Murray was playing and the Nuggets looked great. Shortly after he got injured and missed all of November and Denver was barely above a .500 team without him. In that stretch, I remember Jokic increased his aggressiveness scoring but his efficiency went down from his usual hyper efficient scoring. Still decent but noticeably less efficient. He was scoring nearly 30 ppg in November. When Murray came back, they started winning again and ended the season with their most successful year yet and Jokic was able to play more in his passive scoring role and his efficiency sky rocketed.
There is a significant risk to trading Murray if it does not work out. I think the current chemistry with Murray allows Jokic to also play in his most comfortable playstyle. Shaking that up, I don't know what it will look like. I don't think replacing Murray with someone who will do the same thing leaves much options. Murray takes some really hard shots and I don't know how many players would play better in that role.