brackdan70 wrote:Triple7 wrote:Just saw a video Porzingis going hard on a stationary bike. Looks like he’s nearing playing.
Can he play on a bike?
I mean. What are they going to do? Give him a technical? PUT HIM IN COACH.
Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob
brackdan70 wrote:Triple7 wrote:Just saw a video Porzingis going hard on a stationary bike. Looks like he’s nearing playing.
Can he play on a bike?
Triple7 wrote:lon3lytoaster wrote:
Yep. Agree with Chris, honestly. Barring another additional injury, they are not at all likely to get a better crack at it than what they have laid out in front of them.
If you're going to lose to a good defense in the playoffs, like last year and Miami, fine. Not to Indy. That's not what they do and I think we can shift Minnesota enough to mitigate a lot of what they do.
I agree. Its stupid to lose to the pacers. Enough with the excuses. They should start elevating their game and start locking in.
The pressure is on Tatum. One said that nobody is beating us if Tatum has a great series. Even the wolves or mavs won’t beat us if Tatum elevates his game, or just at least match luka or Antman.
Triple7 wrote:lon3lytoaster wrote:
Yep. Agree with Chris, honestly. Barring another additional injury, they are not at all likely to get a better crack at it than what they have laid out in front of them.
If you're going to lose to a good defense in the playoffs, like last year and Miami, fine. Not to Indy. That's not what they do and I think we can shift Minnesota enough to mitigate a lot of what they do.
I agree. Its stupid to lose to the pacers. Enough with the excuses. They should start elevating their game and start locking in.
The pressure is on Tatum. One said that nobody is beating us if Tatum has a great series. Even the wolves or mavs won’t beat us if Tatum elevates his game, or just at least match luka or Antman.
zoyathedestroya wrote:Irrelevant Fun Fact: Jayson Tatum (0-3) hasn't won a Game 1 of a Conference Finals since his rookie year. All the losses were to Miami.
Celts17Pride wrote:The pressure is on Tatum and Brown. It's time for both to deliver a championship. Tatum and Brown should be scoring 50-60 points every game in this series on high efficiency. Time to step up!
Bar Fight wrote:Triple7 wrote:lon3lytoaster wrote:
Yep. Agree with Chris, honestly. Barring another additional injury, they are not at all likely to get a better crack at it than what they have laid out in front of them.
If you're going to lose to a good defense in the playoffs, like last year and Miami, fine. Not to Indy. That's not what they do and I think we can shift Minnesota enough to mitigate a lot of what they do.
I agree. Its stupid to lose to the pacers. Enough with the excuses. They should start elevating their game and start locking in.
The pressure is on Tatum. One said that nobody is beating us if Tatum has a great series. Even the wolves or mavs won’t beat us if Tatum elevates his game, or just at least match luka or Antman.
Those dudes are so thirsty for the C's to fail lol. They're praying we lose
BK_2020 wrote:Celts17Pride wrote:The pressure is on Tatum and Brown. It's time for both to deliver a championship. Tatum and Brown should be scoring 50-60 points every game in this series on high efficiency. Time to step up!
50-60 points each.
CelticsPride18 wrote:So let me get this straight. According to the analysts the Pacers have a legit shot, but still the Celtics should swept them convincingly. Make it make sense.
zoyathedestroya wrote:CelticsPride18 wrote:So let me get this straight. According to the analysts the Pacers have a legit shot, but still the Celtics should swept them convincingly. Make it make sense.
Cs let their guard down, Pacers have a shot.
Cs play their A-game, Pacers get swept.

lon3lytoaster wrote:zoyathedestroya wrote:CelticsPride18 wrote:So let me get this straight. According to the analysts the Pacers have a legit shot, but still the Celtics should swept them convincingly. Make it make sense.
Cs let their guard down, Pacers have a shot.
Cs play their A-game, Pacers get swept.
As simple as it is, it is what it is.
I think the Pacers have a legitimately very good offense. Despite these historic oRating numbers, I do not however think the Celtics run any sort of great, intricate offense.
If the Celtics play down and the Pacers play up like both are known to do, they could easily steal at least two games.
With that said, that’s their shot. It shouldn’t be any more than that.

playa-hater wrote:I feel Boston should definitely win this series. with or without KP... But this board in general are definitely underrating the Pacers. I hope the Boston players who have that issue at times, do not do the same.
If this game is close at the end, do you really trust Boston will "definitely" come through?? It feels like many on here think that way. Our late game history and Joe scare the "shet" out of me.. Get a nice cushion please.. don't let this game stay close..
BK_2020 wrote:playa-hater wrote:I feel Boston should definitely win this series. with or without KP... But this board in general are definitely underrating the Pacers. I hope the Boston players who have that issue at times, do not do the same.
If this game is close at the end, do you really trust Boston will "definitely" come through?? It feels like many on here think that way. Our late game history and Joe scare the "shet" out of me.. Get a nice cushion please.. don't let this game stay close..
Close games are coinflips. No team definitely comes through in a 3-4 possession games where a 40% chance success roll (e.g. a wide open three) can swing the outcome. If Jimmy Butler makes a wide open three in G7 of 2022 ECF, then they probably move onto the finals and Ime is not clutch and can't coach a close game.