Edwards: Pistons all in
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Edwards: Pistons all in
- Laimbeer
- RealGM
- Posts: 43,004
- And1: 15,126
- Joined: Aug 12, 2009
- Location: Cabin Creek
-
Edwards: Pistons all in
Pistons: Brandon Ingram, Jerami Grant, Jonas Valanciunas
After several years of awfulness, Pistons try to get respectable
Pelicans: Jalen Duren, 5th pick
Pels unload salary and do a reset
Trail Blazers: Jaden Ivey, Evan Fournier, 21st pick
Continue the rebuild and save salary
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5503031/2024/05/20/pistons-trade-free-agency-scenarios/
After several years of awfulness, Pistons try to get respectable
Pelicans: Jalen Duren, 5th pick
Pels unload salary and do a reset
Trail Blazers: Jaden Ivey, Evan Fournier, 21st pick
Continue the rebuild and save salary
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5503031/2024/05/20/pistons-trade-free-agency-scenarios/
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,735
- And1: 1,506
- Joined: May 19, 2023
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
This is A LOT for Jerami Grant and maybe even more for Brandon Ingram.
Those guys fit pretty awful together too.
Defensively... Ausar can't play many minutes with these guys so wow, this is an awful defensive team.
Grant, Ingram, and Cade also want the ball a lot...
Those guys fit pretty awful together too.
Defensively... Ausar can't play many minutes with these guys so wow, this is an awful defensive team.
Grant, Ingram, and Cade also want the ball a lot...
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,904
- And1: 1,239
- Joined: Jun 13, 2023
-
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
Reeks of desperation move, I know Pistons have been awful but his isn't the way. Back off the ledge, Pistons... don't do it.
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,596
- And1: 13,957
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
Laimbeer wrote:Pistons: Brandon Ingram, Jerami Grant, Jonas Valanciunas
After several years of awfulness, Pistons try to get respectable
Pelicans: Jalen Duren, 5th pick
Pels unload salary and do a reset
Trail Blazers: Jaden Ivey, Evan Fournier, 21st pick
Continue the rebuild and save salary
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5503031/2024/05/20/pistons-trade-free-agency-scenarios/
Just what POR needs, a crappier version of Simons.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
- Snakebites
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 51,027
- And1: 18,126
- Joined: Jul 14, 2002
- Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
-
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
wemby wrote:Reeks of desperation move, I know Pistons have been awful but his isn't the way. Back off the ledge, Pistons... don't do it.
Yeah, all of this.
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,039
- And1: 13,957
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
Why is fournier even included?
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
-
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 20,906
- And1: 7,849
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
Godaddycurse wrote:Why is fournier even included?
Why is Jonas?
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,039
- And1: 13,957
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
jayjaysee wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:Why is fournier even included?
Why is Jonas?
At least pistons actually want him to play minutes. Fournier isnt wanted/is getting released
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,911
- And1: 830
- Joined: Jun 02, 2016
-
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
I like James but this was a terrible article lol
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
- vege
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,826
- And1: 4,803
- Joined: Jul 18, 2008
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
This doesn't even make sense. Fournier and Jonas are free agents.
Expiring Ingram is not worth Duren and #5. I am not even sure if he is worth either.
Ivey makes 0 sense to Portland, they have their own guards that play 0 defense to develop alread, and Grant is not worth a lot considering his contract status.
Expiring Ingram is not worth Duren and #5. I am not even sure if he is worth either.
Ivey makes 0 sense to Portland, they have their own guards that play 0 defense to develop alread, and Grant is not worth a lot considering his contract status.
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
-
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 20,906
- And1: 7,849
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
But looks like Detroit is overpaying for both.
Would rather see Detroit trade Cade and just close their eyes for another year than do this.. but I think Ivey and Duren can be taken out and the other teams still likely consider it (once Jonas and Evan are taken out as well)
Would rather see Detroit trade Cade and just close their eyes for another year than do this.. but I think Ivey and Duren can be taken out and the other teams still likely consider it (once Jonas and Evan are taken out as well)
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,894
- And1: 35,979
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
Honestly, this reads like it was written by the Pelicans and Blazers.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,355
- And1: 1,398
- Joined: Feb 03, 2023
-
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
I agree, I think they're overpaying for both.
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,596
- And1: 13,957
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
If this was proposed by a POR fan it might have something we want or need instead of a bench guy, a bust and a pick in a draft when we already have 4 picks in that draft.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,365
- And1: 9,915
- Joined: Oct 27, 2016
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
I could see something with Jerami to DET but this seems steep for DET from all angles.
Grant for Stewart and some SRP would get it done for me.
Grant for Stewart and some SRP would get it done for me.
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,295
- And1: 19,306
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
“Edwards” in the title means someone else to fans outside of DET.
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,762
- And1: 2,501
- Joined: Jan 18, 2019
-
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
No point in making all in moves til u draft a superstar.
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,235
- And1: 3,375
- Joined: Sep 06, 2013
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
I could see ingram to detroit. Duren isn't a good fit next to zion though. Maybe more like Ivey+#5 for ingram +#17.
Pelicans nab clingman at #5 as the shot blocking big to pair with zion and plug ivey in as a 6th man and see if they can develop him as a pg replacement down the line.
Pistons fill the gigantic SF whole in the lineup, and cade, ingram, and duren is a better balanced starting point to try to build around.
Pelicans nab clingman at #5 as the shot blocking big to pair with zion and plug ivey in as a 6th man and see if they can develop him as a pg replacement down the line.
Pistons fill the gigantic SF whole in the lineup, and cade, ingram, and duren is a better balanced starting point to try to build around.
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,445
- And1: 7,181
- Joined: Mar 30, 2006
- Location: Whereever you go - there you are
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
I could see Grant to Detroit. He's a good fit there (they need shooting and defense, but don't need rebounding). Det can give immediate cap relief to Portland and some minor asset (possibly Stewart as mentioned). Ivey back to Portland makes no sense (IMO too much value and clearly a terrible fit).
I could see Ingram to Detroit but I don't like it. in many ways he has the same limitations as Cade does (ball-dominant, poor off-ball, frequent injuries). I don't feel that his trade value is that high. If NO feels that they need to make a move, don't want to move Zion and there isn't much market for Ingram then the Pistons may make a move.
I could see Ingram to Detroit but I don't like it. in many ways he has the same limitations as Cade does (ball-dominant, poor off-ball, frequent injuries). I don't feel that his trade value is that high. If NO feels that they need to make a move, don't want to move Zion and there isn't much market for Ingram then the Pistons may make a move.
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
-
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 16,866
- And1: 3,459
- Joined: May 22, 2001
- Location: Santa Cruz, CA
-
Re: Edwards: Pistons all in
giberish wrote:I could see Grant to Detroit. He's a good fit there (they need shooting and defense, but don't need rebounding). Det can give immediate cap relief to Portland and some minor asset (possibly Stewart as mentioned). Ivey back to Portland makes no sense (IMO too much value and clearly a terrible fit).
I could see Ingram to Detroit but I don't like it. in many ways he has the same limitations as Cade does (ball-dominant, poor off-ball, frequent injuries). I don't feel that his trade value is that high. If NO feels that they need to make a move, don't want to move Zion and there isn't much market for Ingram then the Pistons may make a move.
Acquiring Ingram isn’t the hard part. He’s got one year left on his deal and probably thinks he deserves a max extension.
Return to Trades and Transactions