playoffs wrote:tsherkin wrote:playoffs wrote:I mean, sure, Draymond provides a defensive dimension that Denver doesn't have. But on the whole, would you rather have Wiggins or playoff Jamal Murray as your second option on offense. I think it's ludicrous to say that Steph's supporting cast in 2022 was superior to Jokic's 2023 supporting cast.
Wiggins wasn't really his second option, though. It was more Klay (when he was healthy) and Good Poole, especially in the playoffs.
I think it's not ludicrous to suggest that the supporting casts are on a similar level, as long as you don't oddly fixate only on offense. Golden State was the best defense in the league in 2022. That didn't happen because of Steph. That happened because of the remainder of the roster. That's a reflection of his supporting cast.
Yes, but the poster I originally responded to said that "Curry has played with way, way more talent than Jokić", which may be true for the 2 KD rings, but is absolutely not true for 2022, and was only true in 2014-2016 because building the system around Steph allowed Klay and Draymond to break out and flourish in a way that would've been unlikely to work in a different context.
IN 2022 the warriors are the number 1 defense in the NBA. Jokic has never had that kind of talent around him.
Poole was coming off the bench for the Warriors that year. Adding 17 points per game and near 4 assists. From the bench! He had Gary Payton II off teh bench playing lock down defense. Even Porter Jr is a huge upgrade over Jokic's bench guys. That's before we get into that the warriors had the better starters too.




















