zike_42 wrote:Because he plays for Canada? I've always seen Nash as international because he played for Canada. Ewing and Duncan are seen as American because they played for USA. I go off their national team representation.
So I think the OP has a good point but also want to acknowledge that SGA has chosen to play for Canada and I don't want to take that away from the Canucks.
I've thought a good amount about what the most correct definition for a player's "Origin" is, and I've generally concluded that it has to with where the guy plays high school. There are exceptions to this, particularly in the deeper past, but it's generally in adolescence where players really develop their basketball game.
So with Patrick Ewing, he really doesn't seem to have been focused on basketball until he moved to the US, and that makes it a simple case.
Duncan? Well, he's an American player because he's from the US Virgin Islands, but I would consider those Islands his origin and if they weren't part of the US, I wouldn't call him an American player.
Nash by contrast is quite clearly foreign he came of age in Canadian schools, and this was actually a huge problem for him when he tried to American college scholarships.
SGA, if we're simply considering national borders, is a borderline case here because he was playing basketball in Canada before he went to the US in his sophomore year to get a stronger basketball background. The fact he was thinking in terms of basketball while still being in Canada is an argument to see him as an international player...but the fact that he wasn't even playing varsity high school basketball in Canada makes him a very different case study than Nash who the dominant player of his Canadian province.
There's another factor here that I'm not sure the perfect way to present:
The implication of being an international player is that you grew up in a different basketball culture from American basketball players, and so when any other country gets to the point where their athletes move to the US once they start taking basketball seriously, I don't think they still represent a distinct culture.
Or to put it another way: When you get a scholarship offer to Kentucky, not because you're a 7 foot project with unknown ceiling, but because they've already seen you play against other American prospects and are ranked on all sorts of top recruit lists, you're not really a foreign product.
Now, I want to emphasize that this is true of all countries, but the fact that Canada is right next to the US, and Toronto has emerged as the great city of Canada because it speaks the US language and is super-close to major American cities, made this all the more likely to happen. Modern Canada is built around its most American city, and so those growing up there are likely to be able to jump into American development systems when those are advantageous.
As I say all this, Canadian friends, let me emphasize that I'm a big fan of your country and some of the decisions your country has made that deviate from the US. It's just it's not really a coincidence that your biggest city is so tied to the US.