ImageImageImageImageImage

2024 Draft Thread - Part II

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33

User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 14,936
And1: 6,712
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#901 » by doclinkin » Thu May 30, 2024 12:16 am

The Consiglieri wrote:
TGW wrote:According to the wiretap, it's Sarr or Risaccher.

https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/275882/Wizards-Looking-To-Re-Sign-Tyus-Jones;-Deciding-Between-Drafting-Alex-Sarr-Zaccharie-Risacher-With-No-2-Pick

And no, I don't think it's a smoke screen. I think those are the consensus top 2 picks right now.


Can anyone steel man the reasoning? I know much of the board hates Risaccher, and some hate Sarr, and some hate both, I'd love to hear the steel manning. I'm not at the Johnny Davis level of terror of us taking either guy, but I am concerned at how many of the board hate the guys. While I don't always agree w/the board on who some of the consensus guys are, most of the time you guys on aggregate are right when you hate a selection or at least). I'm curious, what do you guys think, rationally, analytics based, and scouting wise, explains the interest in Risaccher and Sarr so high. What does the league believe about them, that you think is right, and that you think is wrong? I'm super curious. The sense I get is simply the ceiling bet w/both, if they hit on the total upside piece....but I'd be curious to hear what you guys think they love, and how it could be right or wrong etc.


Sarr: You can't teach 7 feet. Big kid playing in a grown man's league. Sarr is 7 foot barefoot, long reach. At 19 years old he is young, athletic, with unknown upside. The attraction is his mobility at size, and therefore with good development he shows promise as a rare inside outside defender. Check the effect a big mobile defender like Dereck Lively is having on the Mavericks. When you have a guy who can show hard on the pick and roll, and still recover to man the paint, you have a playable Big in this league. We are looking at a Wemby era, where Unicorn sightings are no longer rare. Porzingis, Chet, Jokic, Embiid, KAT, various centers show face-up skills. If you cannot counter these players with a mobile defender then you're missing one plate of armor in the suit.

One more key on D: nobody can defend the 3pt shot nowadays. It has unbalanced the game. The only hope for doing so is to blanket the perimeter with long rangy defenders who can all switch, challenge a shot, and force the shooter to pass it or put it on the ground. Where hopefully your weakside guys are also rangy and quick to recover, challenge. If you have a 5 who is playable both outside and inside then teams cannot easily spread you out. Swat one or two jumpers out of the air and make them think. If so you can play a tall ball counter to small ball, and still defend the interior. Stats show Sarr is a truly solid defender on the outside. Not so much on the interior as he is light in the diaper with a high center of gravity. The thing that makes him nimble also currently robs him of power. But he's 19. Feed him. Get him on a strength program. He should get stronger as he grows.

On offense, the league is chasing Wemby's. Face-up bigs. Sarr shows a bit of agility playing outside in. His 70+% FT shooting suggests that his jumper is not irrevocably broken. He can put the ball on the deck end to end on a breakaway, does better dunking when he has a runway. Zero interior game right now, but again, as he gets stronger that should come. He's raw, but if you are cooking a team from scratch you are fine with raw ingredients. Do you trust this developmental team to build his game from the ground up? Because there are few players out there who have the combination of talent and size we see here. When he starts to get strong and realizes it, he may outrun, out maneuver, and out muscle some guys who are smaller, slower and all.

Synergy bonus, he and Bilal being French may see two young cats develop together.

Cons: you can't teach aggression. Garnett was skinny as a cemetery fence. But his fire to compete was clear as a highschooler. Sarr has been known as a talent since he came up the system in Spain (despite being french). Was always tall, and is still playing small. How has his raw talent not dominated in a league where Matthew Delladova is a big name? He's playing 18 minutes a game. Gets outworked on the interior and looks lost on the inside. Underwhelming showing at the combine in athletic testing and shooting alike. Competitive fire is the thing that allows players to develop every offseason. You wish you saw him attack the drills and show out when the spotlight was on him. (Contrast with Castle, who was knocked as a shooter, but came in 3rd in the motion shooting drills).

Hot take: Sarr still ranked at #1 is a smokescreen. I think he slips down the draft and ends up picked mid lotto.

===

Risacher. Was playing in the French Pro league as a 17 year old last year. Son of a pro, lifelong baller, in a family where even his sister is on the pro track. Inconsistent in the past showing flashes but unsustained. This year however grew into a knock-down shooter and was commonly the top scorer on his team, playing starters minutes despite coming off the bench. A revelation on defense, he has shown up solid on this end, when previously he was thought of as too skinny or footslow. This year he was the key defender on his team. Yes, he's young, he will still sometimes get lost or miss his assignment, or get blown by or shoved aside by quicktwitch guys. But he chases the ball to the end of every possession. This means he will press the ballhandler, block shots, cover others mistakes, get dunked on, grab rebounds, even though he is mostly posted as a wing player. He does not sulk, shows solid balance when bumped, will go chest to chest on penetration, get bounced and spring back up. By contrast to Sarr he plays as though he does not know he is skinny. Cool demeanor, quiet but focused, never shouting, but always putting in the effort.

On offense, he simply plays a pro game. Off ball shooter who uses screens well, he has an arsenal of one-dribble two-dribble moves to get an open shot. Shoots a high pretty ball over his head with a quick release, forcing defenders to scramble to get to him. A tall shooter, he's ~6'9" and still filling out. Has great balance-- despite his height most of his muscle is in his foundation. Strong legs. He has skinny shoulders so may not fill out all that much, but plays stronger than his upper body suggests. He will bounce off guys but not fall down. Funny thing, he runs like the Logo, like Jerry West, his upper body staying upright while his legs change direction underneath him. Instinctive sense of the moment on offense, good sense of team play. When guarded he readily gives up the ball to teammates and repositions for a better shot. Great sense of when to attack the lane on backdoor and has the athleticism to climb up and flush the ball on the interior pass. He could instantly earn minutes on any team since his best skill set is exactly what Coaches ask a rookie to do: hit open shots, work hard on defense.

The knock: Inconsistency still shows up in his game. He regularly gets subbed out for making a rookie mistake, especially on defense. He got concussed and his game left him for a midseason slump. His frame is slim from the waist up so he won't be able to add tremendous strength. High floor, medium ceiling. Currently projecting as a non HOF Klay Thompson mimic. Off ball scorer only. Does not add ballhandling, passing. Does he love the game? Or is he doing what is expected of him since he was raised to be a pro baller. Does he play the same position as Bilal and thus reduce the minutes available for one or both?

My read: he is young, but with a precocious understanding of the game. Great team around him developing functional strength and skill. He's quiet, but does care. Looks to me like a great fit next to whomever we draft in the next few drafts. Meanwhile he'll earn developmental minutes next anyone. I like him, even if I know he will probably have games where he is quiet, and other draftees will show out as stars, while fans put pressure on him to look like the #1/#2 player in the league. There will probably be a better guy later in the draft, even if he proves to have a really solid career.

If he keeps winning in the playoffs he will go #1 or there may be a bidding war to trade up to #2. If he is there at 2 the Wizards will take him.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,136
And1: 7,896
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#902 » by Dat2U » Thu May 30, 2024 12:24 am

doclinkin wrote:
Hot take: Sarr still ranked at #1 is a smokescreen. I think he slips down the draft and ends up picked mid lotto.


In a normal year I could buy this as Sarr is not really #1 material... but this year I struggle to find anyone really worthy of a top 5 pick in most years so I'm curious on why you view him as smoke screen when the other options aren't necessarily high floor, high ceiling types.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,136
And1: 7,896
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#903 » by Dat2U » Thu May 30, 2024 12:30 am

Tyrone Messby wrote:Comp may have already been made but does Reed remind anyone else a bit of Steve Nash? He probably goes to the Spurs and becomes a household name with Wemby.


Nash had the ball on a string in college.

That's why these Curry/Nash comps not cutting it.

I think Shepp's best fit is with Charlotte between LaMelo & Miller. They have the length & ball skill to cover up his weaknesses and he'll be a dynamic off the ball weapon to keep defenses from keying on their big two.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,248
And1: 5,026
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#904 » by tontoz » Thu May 30, 2024 12:44 am

Just watched Sarr's season highlights. Trying to warm up to him just in case we pick him :lol:

I still don't see him as a C near term. To me the ideal scenario is for his skills to become good to play the 4 full time. I am not confident this will happen but I can't rule it out either.

If it does work out that would give us the chance to put a big lineup on the floor and potentially a very good defense.

Maybe by his second contract he has enough size to spend some time at C but I just don't think that is a good fit for him for extended time. His size would be well above average at the 4 and he won't have to guard big centers that could just bully him.


"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,402
And1: 20,102
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#905 » by dckingsfan » Thu May 30, 2024 1:05 am

tontoz wrote:...I still don't see him as a C near term. To me the ideal scenario is for his skills to become good to play the 4 full time. I am not confident this will happen but I can't rule it out either.

I hadn't considered this... do you think he can guard 2-4?
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,136
And1: 7,896
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#906 » by Dat2U » Thu May 30, 2024 1:17 am

Dalton Knecht = Dougie McBuckets after doing a deep dive.

Who does he defend? I thought 3s at first due to his frame but now I don't know. No shot in hell of defending guards. Despite his age, he has surprisingly poor awareness.

I also overrated his handle. He's a 2-dribble guy. Not NBA shot creator. Needs room to drive due to a sloppy handle. Likes to dribble with his back to the basket to hide the ball from defender. I don't trust his handle or finishing ability. His best skills is movement shooting along C&S. Can have a limited role offensively but will he score enough to offset him not providing anything else at an NBA level including defense, passing or rebounding?

I would not take him in the top 15.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,248
And1: 5,026
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#907 » by tontoz » Thu May 30, 2024 1:26 am

dckingsfan wrote:
tontoz wrote:...I still don't see him as a C near term. To me the ideal scenario is for his skills to become good to play the 4 full time. I am not confident this will happen but I can't rule it out either.

I hadn't considered this... do you think he can guard 2-4?


His mobility is good. Not elite but good and even when he gets beat he can recover and get a block.

The main time he struggles on D is when someone is bullying him which will happen a lot his first few years. Obviously that is more of a problem at C and why I soured on him quickly. He is a finesse player.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,070
And1: 22,485
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#908 » by nate33 » Thu May 30, 2024 1:28 am

dckingsfan wrote:
tontoz wrote:...I still don't see him as a C near term. To me the ideal scenario is for his skills to become good to play the 4 full time. I am not confident this will happen but I can't rule it out either.

I hadn't considered this... do you think he can guard 2-4?

Yes, but I don't think he is good enough offensively to play the 4. These days, you expect your 4 to hit some 3's, to attack close-outs, and to occasionally create some shots off the dribble. Sarr is a long way from doing those things at an NBA level. If he plays the 4, he will be an average at best player for his career. He can conceivably be a star at the 5.

All that said, I agree that his current lack of physicality is going to be a real problem at the 5 over his first couple of years. Sarr is a project. Whether or not he pans out depends on his work ethic and love of the game.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,248
And1: 5,026
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#909 » by tontoz » Thu May 30, 2024 1:28 am

Small channel but this guy does a good job.


"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,070
And1: 22,485
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#910 » by nate33 » Thu May 30, 2024 1:29 am

tontoz wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
tontoz wrote:...I still don't see him as a C near term. To me the ideal scenario is for his skills to become good to play the 4 full time. I am not confident this will happen but I can't rule it out either.

I hadn't considered this... do you think he can guard 2-4?


His mobility is good. Not elite but good and even when he gets beat he can recover and get a block.

His mobility is elite for a 7-footer. One of the most mobile 7-footers we've seen in years. That's the one thing he can hang his hat on. It's the rest of his game that's the problem.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,248
And1: 5,026
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#911 » by tontoz » Thu May 30, 2024 1:37 am

nate33 wrote:
tontoz wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:I hadn't considered this... do you think he can guard 2-4?


His mobility is good. Not elite but good and even when he gets beat he can recover and get a block.

His mobility is elite for a 7-footer. One of the most mobile 7-footers we've seen in years. That's the one thing he can hang his hat on. It's the rest of his game that's the problem.



We'll just have to agree to disagree on that lol. Sarr might not even be a top 2 athlete among 7 footers in this draft
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,136
And1: 7,896
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#912 » by Dat2U » Thu May 30, 2024 1:56 am

If I was to give a Jan Vesely award to the player I would cringe if we're drafted, it would be .... Tidjane Salaun. Raw is an understatement. About as big a project as you can get. Everything is theoretical with him. His best attribute? His frame + athleticism. He looks like an NBA player. May even play C in time. Shot looks promising although release could be quicker. Quick first step even though handle isn't ready to take advantage.

Now the bad. There's not one thing he does right now at an NBA level. Game moves way to fast for him. Makes wild decisions and moves with the ball on offense he has no business making. Defensively he's completely lost and incapable of defending anyone or any position right now.

The work ethic is apparently good and he's made strides so far as an 18 yr old in a grown man's league but he's also being force fed minutes in a role he can't handle right now.

I would not draft him in the first round ... the learning curve is just too steep based on where he is in his development. I can't remember too many examples where a guy was this raw and went on to have a successful career.

Steven Adams comes to mind but he was a totally different type of player.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,070
And1: 22,485
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#913 » by nate33 » Thu May 30, 2024 2:01 am

tontoz wrote:
nate33 wrote:
tontoz wrote:
His mobility is good. Not elite but good and even when he gets beat he can recover and get a block.

His mobility is elite for a 7-footer. One of the most mobile 7-footers we've seen in years. That's the one thing he can hang his hat on. It's the rest of his game that's the problem.



We'll just have to agree to disagree on that lol. Sarr might not even be a top 2 athlete among 7 footers in this draft

I didn't say he was a top 2 "athlete". He isn't as springy and explosive as Missi. But he is incredibly mobile. His lateral mobility and balance is amazing.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,070
And1: 22,485
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#914 » by nate33 » Thu May 30, 2024 2:08 am

Dat2U wrote:If I was to give a Jan Vesely award to the player I would cringe if we're drafted, it would be .... Tidjane Salaun. Raw is an understatement. About as big a project as you can get. Everything is theoretical with him. His best attribute? His frame + athleticism. He looks like an NBA player. May even play C in time. Shot looks promising although release could be quicker. Quick first step even though handle isn't ready to take advantage.

Now the bad. There's not one thing he does right now at an NBA level. Game moves way to fast for him. Makes wild decisions and moves with the ball on offense he has no business making. Defensively he's completely lost and incapable of defending anyone or any position right now.

The work ethic is apparently good and he's made strides so far as an 18 yr old in a grown man's league but he's also being force fed minutes in a role he can't handle right now.

I would not draft him in the first round ... the learning curve is just too steep based on where he is in his development. I can't remember too many examples where a guy was this raw and went on to have a successful career.

Steven Adams comes to mind but he was a totally different type of player.

I posted a while back of the long and distinctive history of French prospects failing at the NBA level. Outside of Gobert and Wemby (both absolute physical freaks) there have been literally no successful French players drafted in the last 15 years and a whole bunch of terrible busts. Here is the list again:

Bilal Coulibaly
Rayan Rupert
Sidy Cissoko
Victor Wembanyama
Ousmane Dieng
Moussa Diabate
Malcolm Cazalon
Killian Hayes
Theo Maledon
Sekou Doumbouya
Joel Ayayi
Yves Pons
Jaylen Hoard
Olivier Sarr
Frank Ntilikina
Adam Mokoka
Killian Tillie
Elie Okobo
Guerschon Yabusele
Petr Cornelie
Damien Inglis
Timothe Luwawu-Cabarrot
William Howard
Vincent Poirier
Evan Fournier
Axel Toupane
Rudy Gobert

That list includes several first round busts like Dieng (#12), Hayes (#7), Doumbouya (#15), Ntilikina (#8) and Yabusele (#16). The only worthwhile players besides Wemby and Gobert are Fournier and (hopefully) Coulibaly.

I'm not sure we should believe that France is all of a sudden capable of producing multiple lottery talents in consecutive years with such a poor history. After all of those failures, we now expect Sarr, Risacher and Salaun to be top 10 talents and for Dadiet to be the steal of the 2nd round?
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,136
And1: 7,896
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#915 » by Dat2U » Thu May 30, 2024 2:10 am

tontoz wrote:
nate33 wrote:
tontoz wrote:
His mobility is good. Not elite but good and even when he gets beat he can recover and get a block.

His mobility is elite for a 7-footer. One of the most mobile 7-footers we've seen in years. That's the one thing he can hang his hat on. It's the rest of his game that's the problem.



We'll just have to agree to disagree on that lol. Sarr might not even be a top 2 athlete among 7 footers in this draft


I don't know who those other bigs are but what makes Sarr special is his length at 7-1 in combination with his foot speed. His switchability is the best I've seen out of any recent C prospects.

He can definitely defend 4s IMO. In fact he's probably a better perimeter defender than interior defender until he gets stronger. A pairing with him and Tristan Vukcevic may work with Vuk spreading the floor offensively and guarding the C position allowing Sarr to play a FS role and cause havoc.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,110
And1: 4,964
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#916 » by DCZards » Thu May 30, 2024 2:10 am

nate33 wrote:
tontoz wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:I hadn't considered this... do you think he can guard 2-4?


His mobility is good. Not elite but good and even when he gets beat he can recover and get a block.

His mobility is elite for a 7-footer. One of the most mobile 7-footers we've seen in years. That's the one thing he can hang his hat on. It's the rest of his game that's the problem.

Sarr’s mobility and athleticism is what appeals most to me. He’ll be a force on D from day one. Like others here, I do worry about his intensity and what doc inventively called his being “light in the diapers.”

Sarr will almost certainly get bigger and stronger. Question is whether he’ll get tougher to the point that he’s capable of holding his own in the paint defensively.

Sarr and Risacher appear to be emerging as the consensus top two picks in the draft. Seems like Risacher’s recent strong play overseas has sealed the deal for him at #2…wouldn’t be surprised though to see ATL take him at #1, especially since they have Okongwu to hold things down in the paint and may not really see a need for Sarr.

There may be teams interested in trading up to draft Sarr at 2.
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 14,936
And1: 6,712
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#917 » by doclinkin » Thu May 30, 2024 2:28 am

Dat2U wrote:
doclinkin wrote:
Hot take: Sarr still ranked at #1 is a smokescreen. I think he slips down the draft and ends up picked mid lotto.


In a normal year I could buy this as Sarr is not really #1 material... but this year I struggle to find anyone really worthy of a top 5 pick in most years so I'm curious on why you view him as smoke screen when the other options aren't necessarily high floor, high ceiling types.


This year opinions are all over the map on many guys. Teams love one guy, others enthuse about another. The top of the draft is volatile, which suggests to me that each team may have a different favorite. However you don't hear scouts murmuring about Sarr with the same vigor as they defend other favorites. Sarr is the default frontrunner only because he rocketed to the top early in the year in the showcase game against the Elite, then nobody showed up to to make people change their minds.

Convince me Atlanta wants to build around Sarr. He won't make the over-capped team better in year one. If they are picking him its because they need a teardown and rebuild. Is Sarr the foundational piece? He's not dominating in the NBL. Sure he'd help them earn a top pick if they decided to rip everything to the studs and tank for 2025 picks. Because it won't help them win. They could sell Okongwu or Clint to whatever bidders. I just don't think they would be able to offload Trae Young for picks. I think they may try to run it back with one more year of Trae, maybe set up for a mid-season trade if it doesn't work. They could trade back, but again, I see no eagerness among scouts over Sarr's game, so who is trading up for what? I would not be surprised if they took a look at a big guard or wing who can play next to Trae, and listened for offers for Murray, Bogdonavic or anyone else. Try to re-set on the fly out of necessity. Castle or Risacher in play. They are clogged at SF, but have pieces to trade out. Trae next to Holland would be dynamic, if they pulled some wild shuffling of pieces. I think Holland will impress in workouts and may leapfrog players who are mocked higher than him. He seems a likely surprise to jump to the top and his athleticism and motor and defense would help next to whichever short guard ATL commits to keeping. I think they split up Trae and Murray though.

Wizards. We could take Sarr, due to positional length, versatility, etc. They have the timeline to pick a player who is sub par and bet on his development. Still, some part of what they look for is BBIQ and work ethic. I don't see Sarr registering as high in either category. I think they are set on Risacher and will take him if he falls. If he is gone they may listen to offers at the spot. I have a feeling they see Castle as an option though. In OKC they liked big guards, and Castle has been on scouts radar since they were tracking Collier but saw Castle challenge and outplay him at times. As for positional length, I think they'd happily live with some struggles of trying him out at the lead guard spot that he says he wants to play. As a tall PG he adds defensive versatility 1-4, and can make talents like Vukcevic more playable when the court is inverted. Topic may be in play and anyone who tracks stats will have to take a long pause before they pass over Sheppard.

Rockets are in a win-soon phase. I don't see them taking a developmental Big. Off ball sniper Sheppard might fit, but I would not be startled to see them trade back for a veteran plus a pick or to take an older more established player like Knecht or Clingan. Knecht because every team needs shooting. They've got ballhandlers. But I lean more towards Clingan because while Sengun is their keystone player on offense, they still have to play in the West where the top contenders go double Big and after Tari Eason's .9 blocks per game, their next best shotblocker is Fred Van Vleet. In the West you need a guy to tire out opposing behemoths and to clog up the middle. What they don't need is more youth to develop. Clingan is a plug and play guy in the role they need most. Defensive big to sub in and soak fouls. Sengun can play with another big, he's too skilled not to. The Big to Big passing would be tough to stop. And when Sengun rests, Eason next to Clingan would be a tough wall to penetrate. I could see Sarr here for a similar reason, but he'd be sitting more than playing, with duplication by Eason in many respects, and Eason with the better motor. Clingan would play instantly, albeit off the bench.

Spurs will take Castle or Sheppard at 4 & 8 if they can. It was nice to try Sochan in that role but that was for tank purposes. Both of these guys are automatic Popovic favorites. Fundamentally sound team players who fight hard on defense. They have the best shooting coach in the league, Castle is the PG version of Kawhi Leonard. Maybe Topic is in play for them, but given that he plays no defense and can't shoot from outside I can see Pop being very cutting in dismissing him as a prospect in the draft process. But Sarr is a worse version of Wemby in every respect, of all teams they don't need him. If they took Castle early could see them taking a look at Dillingham at 8 though. Wemby is a security blanket on defense, they can take a small guard who is a dynamic creator, especially if they have off ball defenders. Tony Parker redux. They need shot creation more than a worse and weaker Wemby.

Detroit is building around Duren. What does Sarr add? I can see Knecht here. A big shooter who can bail out the team and actually make shots from outside. They are desperate for shotmaking.

Hornets: got Williams. Is Sarr's uptempo rim running a better fit? Maybe. You mentioned Sheppard if he is there yeah, he'd be a better fit than a developmental Big. But I can see Sarr here.

Portland: got Ayton. Have other needs elsewhere. Pretty much anyone else would be a good fit.

But anywhere after this I figure Sarr is 'best talent available' and will be picked regardless of need vs. Not best Player available. Talent. I don't see though that he has separated himself into a higher Tier than the other guys available at the top, and because of that teams will have favorites they argue over, and will pick for Fit more than saying he towers over any other option at the spot.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,136
And1: 7,896
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#918 » by Dat2U » Thu May 30, 2024 2:48 am

Risacher's self creation is really poor. The handle isn't terrible it's just he's not creating any space. The Otto Porter Jr comparisons are legit. I think the role he plays now is the roll he'll play In the NBA without major skill additions. I buy the jumper. He also shows promise as a movement shooter. I think he can attack closeouts. He can go coast to coast in transition. There's just not much upside to an off-the-ball wing that's not a playmaker however.

I like the fact he's a 6-10 shooter with good athleticism, I just wish his game had some versatility.

Defensively he's smart and mature beyond his years in his rotations. His defense will need to be elite to bring real value.

I would not draft him top 5 but have him right below that in the 7-9 range.
User avatar
J-Ves
Analyst
Posts: 3,054
And1: 1,286
Joined: May 16, 2012
 

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#919 » by J-Ves » Thu May 30, 2024 4:52 am

The NBA draft withdrawal deadline has come and gone. Its safe to watch Cam Christie highlights now
User avatar
J-Ves
Analyst
Posts: 3,054
And1: 1,286
Joined: May 16, 2012
 

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#920 » by J-Ves » Thu May 30, 2024 5:03 am

DCZards wrote:
nate33 wrote:
tontoz wrote:
His mobility is good. Not elite but good and even when he gets beat he can recover and get a block.

His mobility is elite for a 7-footer. One of the most mobile 7-footers we've seen in years. That's the one thing he can hang his hat on. It's the rest of his game that's the problem.

Sarr’s mobility and athleticism is what appeals most to me. He’ll be a force on D from day one. Like others here, I do worry about his intensity and what doc inventively called his being “light in the diapers.”

Sarr will almost certainly get bigger and stronger. Question is whether he’ll get tougher to the point that he’s capable of holding his own in the paint defensively.

Sarr and Risacher appear to be emerging as the consensus top two picks in the draft. Seems like Risacher’s recent strong play overseas has sealed the deal for him at #2…wouldn’t be surprised though to see ATL take him at #1, especially since they have Okongwu to hold things down in the paint and may not really see a need for Sarr.

There may be teams interested in trading up to draft Sarr at 2.

There shouldn't be a team in the league that has more interest in Sarr than the Wiz. I don't think they trade him if he falls

Return to Washington Wizards