Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
KamikazeK wrote:Bob8 wrote:Sweet Serenity wrote:
Your responses are making absolutely no sense mate
You just can't comprehend that Mavs can play great offense lead by Luka and great D lead by Lively. You will understand soon enough.
Your defense led by a rookie is going to be sliced up like swiss cheese by a veteran team loaded with offensive weapons and an even better defense.
Bob8 wrote:Sweet Serenity wrote:Bob8 wrote:
It's a specific day. The day Kidd changed starting lineup and put Gafford in the starting lineup. Game against Miami.
He literally just gave you the statistics on where they ranked defensively. Unless you’re saying that on March 8 they had the best defensive rating that day then you are wrong.
They had the best defensive rtg since March 8th, last 20 games.
Bob8 wrote:Sweet Serenity wrote:Bob8 wrote:
You just can't comprehend that Mavs can play great offense lead by Luka and great D lead by Lively. You will understand soon enough.
It’s like whatever say to you goes through one ear & straight out the other but I’ll say it one last time & hopefully it goes through.
I’m nit talking about the Mavs or Pacers defence. I’m talking about their offences specifically & trying to point out to you that the Pacers offence is a lot harder to defend for the Celtics than the Mavs offence.
Read it 3 times so it finally gets through to you for christ sake ..
So you believe games are decided only by ofense? Interesting. Don't you think Pacers would have won few games with better D?
Sweet Serenity wrote:Bob8 wrote:Sweet Serenity wrote:
He literally just gave you the statistics on where they ranked defensively. Unless you’re saying that on March 8 they had the best defensive rating that day then you are wrong.
They had the best defensive rtg since March 8th, last 20 games.
He’s including the playoffs. That 20 game sample size is from March 8 till the end of the regular season lol
Sweet Serenity wrote:Bob8 wrote:Sweet Serenity wrote:
It’s like whatever say to you goes through one ear & straight out the other but I’ll say it one last time & hopefully it goes through.
I’m nit talking about the Mavs or Pacers defence. I’m talking about their offences specifically & trying to point out to you that the Pacers offence is a lot harder to defend for the Celtics than the Mavs offence.
Read it 3 times so it finally gets through to you for christ sake ..
So you believe games are decided only by ofense? Interesting. Don't you think Pacers would have won few games with better D?
You’re having a completely different argument with me & you’re still yet to figure it out
Bob8 wrote:Sweet Serenity wrote:Bob8 wrote:
So you believe games are decided only by ofense? Interesting. Don't you think Pacers would have won few games with better D?
You’re having a completely different argument with me & you’re still yet to figure it out
My argument is easy, Pacers are bad defensive team so their offensive game doesn't mean much. Your argument is, Pacers are giving you more problems in offensive side, which might be true or not, but has no baring to how this series will be played, because D is the part of equation too.
I'm sure you will make huge money betting on Celtics. You should bet the house on it.
Bob8 wrote:Sweet Serenity wrote:Bob8 wrote:
They had the best defensive rtg since March 8th, last 20 games.
He’s including the playoffs. That 20 game sample size is from March 8 till the end of the regular season lol
Sure it is, you can't include playoffs with different series and different number of games played.
Bob8 wrote:They had the best defensive rtg from March 8th, when Kidd changed starting lineup.
Texas Chuck wrote:I think I figured out this thread.
My team is awesome.
You are dumb if you think the other team has a chance.
Then repeat that 50x ever more aggressively.
Sent from my SM-A136U using RealGM mobile app
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
I also look at it this way;jc23 wrote:Mavs are definitely the team people want to win. Im looking forward to Lukas interaction with the boston crowd.
Bob8 wrote:CoP wrote:Bob8 wrote:
They had the best defensive rtg from March 8th, when Kidd changed starting lineup.
So then not since March. Rather, since some very specific date that fits a certain narrative. Let's do it some more:
7th since March 1
2nd since March 12
5th since March 30
That was fun.
It's a specific day. The day Kidd changed starting lineup and put Gafford in the starting lineup. Game against Miami.
Bob8 wrote:Sweet Serenity wrote:Bob8 wrote:
It's a specific day. The day Kidd changed starting lineup and put Gafford in the starting lineup. Game against Miami.
He literally just gave you the statistics on where they ranked defensively. Unless you’re saying that on March 8 they had the best defensive rating that day then you are wrong.
They had the best defensive rtg since March 8th, last 20 games.
SportsGuru08 wrote:I've seen enough to say Dallas in 6. Luka and Kyrie have that dog in them whereas Tatum and Brown both have a tendency to vanish. Boston hasn't been tested, Dallas has.
jfs1000d wrote:SportsGuru08 wrote:I've seen enough to say Dallas in 6. Luka and Kyrie have that dog in them whereas Tatum and Brown both have a tendency to vanish. Boston hasn't been tested, Dallas has.
This is odd. Seems like emotional rather than rationals.
What does dog in them mean? And, Celtics haven’t been tested, what does that have to do with anything.
4 of 5 starters on Boston have Finals Experience. Tatum and brown have played over 100 playoff games in career and been to 6 ECF and now 2 Finals.
Listen, late game needing a basket over great defense? I pick Mavs.
But why are we assuming Boston just doesn’t run them into the ground. Way too much firepower on Boston’s side IMO.