SeattleJazzFan wrote:HadAnEffectHere wrote:ESPN says prospects are refusing to work out for the Hornets.
did they mention a reason why?
Yup.. need a source and reason why. Money is money...
Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus
                                                                                                          SeattleJazzFan wrote:HadAnEffectHere wrote:ESPN says prospects are refusing to work out for the Hornets.
did they mention a reason why?
                   
                   
                                                       
               RookieStar wrote:SeattleJazzFan wrote:HadAnEffectHere wrote:ESPN says prospects are refusing to work out for the Hornets.
did they mention a reason why?
Yup.. need a source and reason why. Money is money...

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
                   
                                                       
               
                   
                   
                                                                      babyjax13 wrote:RookieStar wrote:SeattleJazzFan wrote:
did they mention a reason why?
Yup.. need a source and reason why. Money is money...
Players have been refusing to work out for Charlotte for several years, this is pretty frequent with poorly run organizations (historically, Charlotte and Sacramento seem to have the most of this) and places that are 'undesirable' locations (Utah). This is especially true with players that don't think they will have a role on the team (so it is mainly point guards not working out with Charlotte, but I think Castle is using the 'point guard' cover to avoid Charlotte and Detroit drafting him).
This year: https://www.si.com/nba/hornets/draft/espn-reports-draft-prospects-unwilling-to-workout-for-charlotte#:~:text=Projected%20point%20guards%20Rob%20Dillingham,the%20Hornets%20starting%20point%20guard.
The source was also in the original post, this was an easy google, so I don't know why people are so hung up on it lol
                   
                   
                                                       
               
                                     
                                                                      CptCrunch wrote:Can someone explain this delusion going on with Clingan? At least with Edey (who I have a 20-35 pick), I can see a path to extreme upside.
Clingan's ceiling is Walker Kessler. Why is this 50% FT, no offense, slowest player in NBA going #3-5? T Are are people really that deluded by his two NCAA championships?
                   
                                                       
               
                                                                                                          CptCrunch wrote:Can someone explain this delusion going on with Clingan? At least with Edey (who I have a 20-35 pick), I can see a path to extreme upside.
Clingan's ceiling is Walker Kessler. Why is this 50% FT, no offense, slowest player in NBA going #3-5? T Are are people really that deluded by his two NCAA championships?
BlazersBroncos wrote:CptCrunch wrote:Can someone explain this delusion going on with Clingan? At least with Edey (who I have a 20-35 pick), I can see a path to extreme upside.
Clingan's ceiling is Walker Kessler. Why is this 50% FT, no offense, slowest player in NBA going #3-5? T Are are people really that deluded by his two NCAA championships?
I dont really get it. I like Clingan, and think at like #12 he would be a great pick for OKC. But I dont see why he is being talked about in the Top 5, even Top 3. Or why teams like my Blazers are apparently talking about trading up for him.
I see a guy thats likely going to be an elite rim protector, elite post defender, great rebounder, plays very hard and has a great motor for his size. Loves the game. Decent passing. But I dont see the offensive upside, dont think he is a guy you want as more than the 5th option on offense (Maybe 4th, even then thats a stretch). Dont see a guy that can play anything but drop coverage (And he IS mobile for his size, he just isnt a unicorn).
I could see sense in OKC moving up from 12 to 7 or 8 to take him as he is a pretty ideal fit for what they need, but they have a luxury of assets to use to trade up. What I dont get is rebuilding teams targeting him as seemingly a needle mover. He isnt. He is a good talent, a great fit for some teams and a smart addition for teams (Again, OKC) that need what he brings. But a needle mover he is not.
                   
                   
                                                                      CptCrunch wrote:Can someone explain this delusion going on with Clingan? At least with Edey (who I have a 20-35 pick), I can see a path to extreme upside.
Clingan's ceiling is Walker Kessler. Why is this 50% FT, no offense, slowest player in NBA going #3-5? T Are are people really that deluded by his two NCAA championships?
Chuck Everett wrote:Clingan has an NBA role. An elite rim protector is more valuable than a dime a dozen high usage chucker. You got Luka or SGA in this draft, sure don't pick him, but saying he's Walker Kessler isn't an insult. Kessler got jerked his second year due to injury and the Jazz tanking to keep his pick. I personally think he's better than Walker, but my reasoning for why he could go to Houston, because adding a rim protector/big man lob threat (Steve Adams is no longer either) behind Sengun is so worth it. They could throw elite defensive lineups out there with Clingan/Jabari/Eason/Brooks and Amen Thompson for stretches. Houston isn't going to have more star power than Dallas or San Antonio moving forward, but they could have a roster that goes 10-11 deep with quality NBA talent.
                                                                                                          tester551 wrote:Chuck Everett wrote:Clingan has an NBA role. An elite rim protector is more valuable than a dime a dozen high usage chucker. You got Luka or SGA in this draft, sure don't pick him, but saying he's Walker Kessler isn't an insult. Kessler got jerked his second year due to injury and the Jazz tanking to keep his pick. I personally think he's better than Walker, but my reasoning for why he could go to Houston, because adding a rim protector/big man lob threat (Steve Adams is no longer either) behind Sengun is so worth it. They could throw elite defensive lineups out there with Clingan/Jabari/Eason/Brooks and Amen Thompson for stretches. Houston isn't going to have more star power than Dallas or San Antonio moving forward, but they could have a roster that goes 10-11 deep with quality NBA talent.
Again, hes a good rim protector... not elite.
I do like the Mark Williams/ Walker Kessler comps for him though, as realistic outcomes.
I do agree this big man archetype is more impactful than a chucker, but those big men are also significantly less valuable than a 2-way wing

                   
                   
                                                                      tester551 wrote:Chuck Everett wrote:Clingan has an NBA role. An elite rim protector is more valuable than a dime a dozen high usage chucker. You got Luka or SGA in this draft, sure don't pick him, but saying he's Walker Kessler isn't an insult. Kessler got jerked his second year due to injury and the Jazz tanking to keep his pick. I personally think he's better than Walker, but my reasoning for why he could go to Houston, because adding a rim protector/big man lob threat (Steve Adams is no longer either) behind Sengun is so worth it. They could throw elite defensive lineups out there with Clingan/Jabari/Eason/Brooks and Amen Thompson for stretches. Houston isn't going to have more star power than Dallas or San Antonio moving forward, but they could have a roster that goes 10-11 deep with quality NBA talent.
Again, hes a good rim protector... not elite.
I do like the Mark Williams/ Walker Kessler comps for him though, as realistic outcomes.
I do agree this big man archetype is more impactful than a chucker, but those big men are also significantly less valuable than a 2-way wing
The Moose wrote:tester551 wrote:Chuck Everett wrote:Clingan has an NBA role. An elite rim protector is more valuable than a dime a dozen high usage chucker. You got Luka or SGA in this draft, sure don't pick him, but saying he's Walker Kessler isn't an insult. Kessler got jerked his second year due to injury and the Jazz tanking to keep his pick. I personally think he's better than Walker, but my reasoning for why he could go to Houston, because adding a rim protector/big man lob threat (Steve Adams is no longer either) behind Sengun is so worth it. They could throw elite defensive lineups out there with Clingan/Jabari/Eason/Brooks and Amen Thompson for stretches. Houston isn't going to have more star power than Dallas or San Antonio moving forward, but they could have a roster that goes 10-11 deep with quality NBA talent.
Again, hes a good rim protector... not elite.
I do like the Mark Williams/ Walker Kessler comps for him though, as realistic outcomes.
I do agree this big man archetype is more impactful than a chucker, but those big men are also significantly less valuable than a 2-way wing
Why do you say good but not elite?
By pretty much every metric available his rim defense numbers are elite and compare favorably to any prospect in the last 5+ years
                                                                                                          tester551 wrote:The Moose wrote:tester551 wrote:Again, hes a good rim protector... not elite.
I do like the Mark Williams/ Walker Kessler comps for him though, as realistic outcomes.
I do agree this big man archetype is more impactful than a chucker, but those big men are also significantly less valuable than a 2-way wing
Why do you say good but not elite?
By pretty much every metric available his rim defense numbers are elite and compare favorably to any prospect in the last 5+ years
I view elite as being the top 2-3 player in the league for that skill.
When watching him play, I don't see opposing players FEARING taking the ball to the rim (like against Motumbo & Davis).
As far as NCAA seasons go, playing around with this site: https://barttorvik.com/trank.php#
With these filters:
Usage ≥ 10; Games Played ≥ 15; Def Reb % ≥ 20; Block % ≥ 6; Box +/- ≥ 5; Def. BPM ≥ 2; Conf = High Major; PORPAGATU! ≥ 4;
We have elite defensive prospects of Towns, Azubuike, Davis, Kessler (by DRtg)
And elite shot blockers of Kessler, Konante, & Davis (by block %)

                   
                                                                                        CptCrunch wrote:Can someone explain this delusion going on with Clingan? At least with Edey (who I have a 20-35 pick), I can see a path to extreme upside.
Clingan's ceiling is Walker Kessler. Why is this 50% FT, no offense, slowest player in NBA going #3-5? T Are are people really that deluded by his two NCAA championships?
                   
                   
                                                       
               
                                     
                                                                      BigGargamel wrote:Edey does not have more upside than Clingan, come on now.