zimpy27 wrote:One_and_Done wrote:Lakers don't need or want Vuc (or DDR). It's Caruso or nothing I suspect.
I could see a DeMar SnT with Caruso.
Rui+JHS+17
Caruso, Reaves, DeMar, LeBron, Davis
How are the Lakers getting under the first apron there?
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
zimpy27 wrote:One_and_Done wrote:Lakers don't need or want Vuc (or DDR). It's Caruso or nothing I suspect.
I could see a DeMar SnT with Caruso.
Rui+JHS+17
Caruso, Reaves, DeMar, LeBron, Davis
Scoot McGroot wrote:zimpy27 wrote:One_and_Done wrote:Lakers don't need or want Vuc (or DDR). It's Caruso or nothing I suspect.
I could see a DeMar SnT with Caruso.
Rui+JHS+17
Caruso, Reaves, DeMar, LeBron, Davis
How are the Lakers getting under the first apron there?
Colbinii wrote:ChettheJet wrote:Vucevic at the 5 with AD next to him would be the first time that he had a real PF. Vuc doesn't get the blocked shot stats that people love but I'd like to see what he could do if he's not the only big on the floor. If you think it's bad defense from Vucevic that he goes to stop a shot so his guy misses but the rotation isn't there and there's an uncontested put back, then yeah he's bad because he can't cover 2 guys in the lane.
Sure if the Lakers want Caruso at the same time make it #17 and JHS and Jaxson Hayes. The Bulls have Javon Carter at half the price of Vincent, they don't need to of the same back up guards that hardly play. If the Bulls were to bring back Javonte Green to actually play guard, he's ahead of both Vincent and Carter for less money.
Aaron Gordon wasn't a real PF?jbk1234 wrote:
He played next to Ibaka in Orlando.
For half of a season.
zimpy27 wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:zimpy27 wrote:
I could see a DeMar SnT with Caruso.
Rui+JHS+17
Caruso, Reaves, DeMar, LeBron, Davis
How are the Lakers getting under the first apron there?
By letting DLo walk
meekrab wrote:Lakers don't have the assets for Caruso, Jeannie shouldn't have let him go over pennies.
coldfish wrote:Lakers don't want Vuc. Lakers don't have assets for Caruso. Nothing really to discuss. The Venn diagram of trades that the two teams would be OK with are two separate circles.
Karmaloop wrote:coldfish wrote:Lakers don't want Vuc. Lakers don't have assets for Caruso. Nothing really to discuss. The Venn diagram of trades that the two teams would be OK with are two separate circles.
If Caruso were some super valuable asset, he would have been dealt by now for a hefty price tag. The more likely scenario is the Bulls' GM has been overvaluing him, and now he's an expiring contract.
Scoot McGroot wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:
How are the Lakers getting under the first apron there?
By letting DLo walk
Letting DLo walk would put you about $14m under the first apron. What’s the rest of the deal? Rui/JHS/17 would allow you to take back about $27m, if you sign 17 and wait 30 days to include their salary. Caruso is almost $10m of that, and DDR would take what….$25m? So you’d be short. Or Are you just hoping to get him for a little over MLE at the $17m remaining? Even if you do get that lucky, you’re $8m under the first apron with 4-5 roster spots left to fill.
As you can see, it requires DDR signing for very little, and even then, requires LA to fill 4-5 vet minimum spots (and they can’t really be the 2 years with player options like it took to get Hayes and Reddish, as their cap numbers would be higher).
zimpy27 wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:zimpy27 wrote:
By letting DLo walk
Letting DLo walk would put you about $14m under the first apron. What’s the rest of the deal? Rui/JHS/17 would allow you to take back about $27m, if you sign 17 and wait 30 days to include their salary. Caruso is almost $10m of that, and DDR would take what….$25m? So you’d be short. Or Are you just hoping to get him for a little over MLE at the $17m remaining? Even if you do get that lucky, you’re $8m under the first apron with 4-5 roster spots left to fill.
As you can see, it requires DDR signing for very little, and even then, requires LA to fill 4-5 vet minimum spots (and they can’t really be the 2 years with player options like it took to get Hayes and Reddish, as their cap numbers would be higher).
Oh I think DeMar is taking $15-17m.
Godaddycurse wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:
Letting DLo walk would put you about $14m under the first apron. What’s the rest of the deal? Rui/JHS/17 would allow you to take back about $27m, if you sign 17 and wait 30 days to include their salary. Caruso is almost $10m of that, and DDR would take what….$25m? So you’d be short. Or Are you just hoping to get him for a little over MLE at the $17m remaining? Even if you do get that lucky, you’re $8m under the first apron with 4-5 roster spots left to fill.
As you can see, it requires DDR signing for very little, and even then, requires LA to fill 4-5 vet minimum spots (and they can’t really be the 2 years with player options like it took to get Hayes and Reddish, as their cap numbers would be higher).
Oh I think DeMar is taking $15-17m.
Isnt Chicago offering him 40M?
Godaddycurse wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:
Letting DLo walk would put you about $14m under the first apron. What’s the rest of the deal? Rui/JHS/17 would allow you to take back about $27m, if you sign 17 and wait 30 days to include their salary. Caruso is almost $10m of that, and DDR would take what….$25m? So you’d be short. Or Are you just hoping to get him for a little over MLE at the $17m remaining? Even if you do get that lucky, you’re $8m under the first apron with 4-5 roster spots left to fill.
As you can see, it requires DDR signing for very little, and even then, requires LA to fill 4-5 vet minimum spots (and they can’t really be the 2 years with player options like it took to get Hayes and Reddish, as their cap numbers would be higher).
Oh I think DeMar is taking $15-17m.
Isnt Chicago offering him 40M?
coldfish wrote:Chicago's management are a bunch of idiots. You need to keep that in mind.
Regardless, the Bulls got offers of 2 1sts for Caruso at the deadline and said no. So, yeah, they are overvaluing him but LA isn't even in the ballpark.
Reportedly the team wants to extend him btw.
coldfish wrote:Karmaloop wrote:coldfish wrote:Lakers don't want Vuc. Lakers don't have assets for Caruso. Nothing really to discuss. The Venn diagram of trades that the two teams would be OK with are two separate circles.
If Caruso were some super valuable asset, he would have been dealt by now for a hefty price tag. The more likely scenario is the Bulls' GM has been overvaluing him, and now he's an expiring contract.
Chicago's management are a bunch of idiots. You need to keep that in mind.
Regardless, the Bulls got offers of 2 1sts for Caruso at the deadline and said no. So, yeah, they are overvaluing him but LA isn't even in the ballpark.
Reportedly the team wants to extend him btw.
mademan wrote:coldfish wrote:Karmaloop wrote:
If Caruso were some super valuable asset, he would have been dealt by now for a hefty price tag. The more likely scenario is the Bulls' GM has been overvaluing him, and now he's an expiring contract.
Chicago's management are a bunch of idiots. You need to keep that in mind.
Regardless, the Bulls got offers of 2 1sts for Caruso at the deadline and said no. So, yeah, they are overvaluing him but LA isn't even in the ballpark.
Reportedly the team wants to extend him btw.
Chicago can want what they want, but there is no world where Caruso, on an expiring, is worth more than what the Lakers can offer. Chicago may ultimately not want to trade him and re-sign him next offseason, but that doesnt mean he's worth a crap ton.
coldfish wrote:As I said, the Bulls management team is a bunch of idiots. No argument there. That said, if the Bulls were actually serious about trading Caruso as part of a rebuild they would get much better offers than LAL's dross. LA has nothing to trade.
Karmaloop wrote:coldfish wrote:As I said, the Bulls management team is a bunch of idiots. No argument there. That said, if the Bulls were actually serious about trading Caruso as part of a rebuild they would get much better offers than LAL's dross. LA has nothing to trade.
What exactly do you think Caruso on an expiring contract is worth?
coldfish wrote:Karmaloop wrote:coldfish wrote:As I said, the Bulls management team is a bunch of idiots. No argument there. That said, if the Bulls were actually serious about trading Caruso as part of a rebuild they would get much better offers than LAL's dross. LA has nothing to trade.
What exactly do you think Caruso on an expiring contract is worth?
Maybe a protected first and salary relief?
Colbinii wrote:coldfish wrote:Karmaloop wrote:
What exactly do you think Caruso on an expiring contract is worth?
Maybe a protected first and salary relief?
Salary relief as in? Eating who?
Return to Trades and Transactions