Capn'O wrote:Love JJJ
he's not a great rebounder but if you put him in lineups with Randle/Hart ect....he is a great rim protector and can space the floor a bit on offense.
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
Capn'O wrote:Love JJJ
dakomish23 wrote:Has there been any talk about bringing back Precious? If not, I really hope they focus on getting a way better 3rd string C. We desperately need one
mpharris36 wrote:Capn'O wrote:Love JJJ
he's not a great rebounder but if you put him in lineups with Randle/Hart ect....he is a great rim protector and can space the floor a bit on offense.
Knicksfan1992 wrote:dakomish23 wrote:Has there been any talk about bringing back Precious? If not, I really hope they focus on getting a way better 3rd string C. We desperately need one
No talk about it but, I have a theory that the Mitch trade talks are the pathway to the Knicks keeping Precious to be backup C.
Trade Mitch for wing help
Develop Precious into backup big for cheaper than Mitch
Profit?
Knicksfan1992 wrote:I, personally, am a little lower on JJJ than most seem to be.
On the surface he should be a great player. He's been an efficient scorer basically his whole career. He grades out as an awesome rim protector and is good in switches too.
But, something is fishy to me every time I watch him. Last year was his first year over 30 mpg. Red flag IMO. It just seems like he's got some Towns in him where he can't help but pick up dumb fouls that keep him off the floor. That kinda thing usually gets exposed in the playoffs. Speaking of the playoffs, his numbers are abysmal and his foul rate is higher over a decent enough sample size of 23 games... Also, there's no physical reason JJJ should not be a 5 in today's NBA. Why does Memphis continuously feel the need to pair him with an anchor big? If he's landlocked at the 4, I think that hurts his value significantly.
I also don't love bigs that can't rebound. In a league that is slowly reverting back to crashing the offensive glass, you simply cannot survive playing a guy at the 5 for long stretches who has the rebounding rate of a guard. This came to a head with Team USA where Kerr felt the need to play Hart at basically Center because they could not grab a rebound with JJJ on the floor...This is usually something that doesn't really improve with time either. Generally, you are either a good rebounder or your not.
To me he's the Mikal Bridges of bigs. Once you increase his responsibility, his value seems to diminish greatly. His efficiency fell off a cliff this year without Ja.
While the Knicks have the sort of personnel that can accommodate JJJ's weaknesses, I still prefer Randle I think. Especially since JJJ would almost assuredly be coming in in replacement of him. He also is going to command a massive pay bump in his next deal. I'd be weary of giving a guy who doesn't really create his own offense well or for others that kind of deal if he can't anchor your defense as a 5.
Just my 2 cents on JJJ
KnixinSix wrote:HopelessKnick wrote:KnixinSix wrote:
It is possible that he won't ask out. But if he does THIS is the type of player you give a big package for. In almost no past superstar trade has a guy like Randle been included. Randle is a 25/10/5 guy who is under 30. That asking price you posed above is not what the price would be. It would be closer to what I proposed.
The asking price may have been a little too high but didn't you yourself suggest that Randle would be involved in your original proposal?
Absolutely I did. However The main point is WITH Randle in the trade it won't also include the excessive amount of additional assets you posted above.
HopelessKnick wrote:KnixinSix wrote:HopelessKnick wrote:
The asking price may have been a little too high but didn't you yourself suggest that Randle would be involved in your original proposal?
Absolutely I did. However The main point is WITH Randle in the trade it won't also include the excessive amount of additional assets you posted above.
I get where you are coming from and I concede you may be right. However keep in mind we are likely talking the most or second most valuable player in the league at 29 years of age. Anyways it is kinda moot anyways...
HopelessKnick wrote:Finals need to start....we are throwing around the currently most unattainable bigs one can think of....Giannis, JJJ, Mobley etc.
As for a Stretch 4/5....I think we'd have to go the Minny route and draft one (Naz Reid). I mean we had one in Portis but let him go...I actually think he would do fine with the current group. A big that can shoot, rebound and defend at a solid level is extremely rare...you often times only have one or two of the 3 things.
If Precious could only learn to knock down 3s at 35% and take 5-6 a game.... he'd be really really great. I mean is it really that difficult? I feel like if he would commit to shoot 1000 3s a day throughout the summer he'd surely be able to know some down right?
RHODEY wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:HopelessKnick wrote:Finals need to start....we are throwing around the currently most unattainable bigs one can think of....Giannis, JJJ, Mobley etc.
As for a Stretch 4/5....I think we'd have to go the Minny route and draft one (Naz Reid). I mean we had one in Portis but let him go...I actually think he would do fine with the current group. A big that can shoot, rebound and defend at a solid level is extremely rare...you often times only have one or two of the 3 things.
If Precious could only learn to knock down 3s at 35% and take 5-6 a game.... he'd be really really great. I mean is it really that difficult? I feel like if he would commit to shoot 1000 3s a day throughout the summer he'd surely be able to know some down right?
This just isn’t how it works. The answer is,”Yes, it’s really that difficult.“
Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
Richard4444 wrote:Capn'O wrote:Love JJJ
I always trade Randle for JJJ in 2K...
BigShot Bojan wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:HopelessKnick wrote:Finals need to start....we are throwing around the currently most unattainable bigs one can think of....Giannis, JJJ, Mobley etc.
As for a Stretch 4/5....I think we'd have to go the Minny route and draft one (Naz Reid). I mean we had one in Portis but let him go...I actually think he would do fine with the current group. A big that can shoot, rebound and defend at a solid level is extremely rare...you often times only have one or two of the 3 things.
If Precious could only learn to knock down 3s at 35% and take 5-6 a game.... he'd be really really great. I mean is it really that difficult? I feel like if he would commit to shoot 1000 3s a day throughout the summer he'd surely be able to know some down right?
This just isn’t how it works. The answer is,”Yes, it’s really that difficult.“
Brooke Lopez enters the conversation