UTA-BKN-PHX

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

HadAnEffectHere
Veteran
Posts: 2,735
And1: 1,506
Joined: May 19, 2023

UTA-BKN-PHX 

Post#1 » by HadAnEffectHere » Wed Jun 5, 2024 12:46 pm

Jazz get: Jusuf Nurkic, 2031 Suns pick, three second round picks from Suns
Nets get: 22nd pick, $14.2m TPE
Suns: Walker Kessler, Dorian Finney Smith, two second round picks from the Nets

Why for Jazz: Trade a good player they don't like for a high risk, high reward pick.

Nets: Get decent value for DFS

Suns: Get a good starting center (who can actually dunk which will help their offense a lot and can block shots and thus can help their defense) at a very low salary and get a pretty good bench wing while still having 3 second round picks to attach to one of their contracts to potentially make another move using the contracts of DFS or Royce if either fall off next year.
Fo-Real
General Manager
Posts: 9,771
And1: 5,481
Joined: Mar 21, 2009
     

Re: UTA-BKN-PHX 

Post#2 » by Fo-Real » Wed Jun 5, 2024 6:11 pm

I see why the Suns do it but why anyone else? And is it legal?
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,879
And1: 7,837
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: UTA-BKN-PHX 

Post#3 » by jayjaysee » Wed Jun 5, 2024 6:18 pm

the second round picks feel confusing/complicated/unnecessary.

Utah does it without getting seconds IMO, unless that pick has protection*.. and then if you need the seconds in, why not just have 2 seconds from Brooklyn +1 from Phoenix going to Utah? Brooklyn is paying Phoenix, for Phoenix to pay Utah?

Especially since Phoenix only can actually trade 2 seconds. (Boston 2028 protected and Phoenix 2031)

I think Utah might be able to get a second from each team. But it’s not really needed.

I think all three teams do this, but could be simplified down some.
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,108
And1: 3,437
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: UTA-BKN-PHX 

Post#4 » by SkyHook » Wed Jun 5, 2024 6:26 pm

HadAnEffectHere wrote:Jazz get: Jusuf Nurkic, 2031 Suns pick, three second round picks from Suns
Nets get: 22nd pick, $14.2m TPE
Suns: Walker Kessler, Dorian Finney Smith, two second round picks from the Nets

Why for Jazz: Trade a good player they don't like for a high risk, high reward pick.

Nets: Get decent value for DFS

Suns: Get a good starting center (who can actually dunk which will help their offense a lot and can block shots and thus can help their defense) at a very low salary and get a pretty good bench wing while still having 3 second round picks to attach to one of their contracts to potentially make another move using the contracts of DFS or Royce if either fall off next year.


The bolded is a broken record of absolute nonsense at this point. As for the proposal, it might be a reluctantly accepted option-K if Ainge's "big game hunting" is a bust.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 15,976
And1: 4,141
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: UTA-BKN-PHX 

Post#5 » by daoneandonly » Wed Jun 5, 2024 6:33 pm

Horrifically slanted in favor of PHX. They unlaod the worst contract and get the best player and prospect. Simply confusing as to why the other teams play ball with this.
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,879
And1: 7,837
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: UTA-BKN-PHX 

Post#6 » by jayjaysee » Wed Jun 5, 2024 6:37 pm

daoneandonly wrote:Horrifically slanted in favor of PHX. They unlaod the worst contract and get the best player and prospect. Simply confusing as to why the other teams play ball with this.


Trading a decent prospect for a high variance pick is exactly what Utah should be doing.

Losing value by taking on Nurk to get it done is fine. Utah can still renegotiate Lauri and Nurk can start next to him until Utah picks a real direction.

22nd is an overpay for DFS, which should weigh in some on dumping Nurk.

I think even if Utah loses on value, they should do it.
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 15,976
And1: 4,141
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: UTA-BKN-PHX 

Post#7 » by daoneandonly » Wed Jun 5, 2024 6:39 pm

jayjaysee wrote:
daoneandonly wrote:Horrifically slanted in favor of PHX. They unlaod the worst contract and get the best player and prospect. Simply confusing as to why the other teams play ball with this.


Trading a decent prospect for a high variance pick is exactly what Utah should be doing.

Losing value by taking on Nurk to get it done is fine. Utah can still renegotiate Lauri and Nurk can start next to him until Utah picks a real direction.

22nd is an overpay for DFS, which should weigh in some on dumping Nurk.

I think even if Utah loses on value, they should do it.


Maybe I still have some rose colored glasses for DFS and my opinion of Nurk being overpaid, stiff, and not that reliable is clouding my judgement, but think PHX owes more
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live

Return to Trades and Transactions