ImageImage

Fake Trade Thread #6

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop

User avatar
MasterIchiro
RealGM
Posts: 21,388
And1: 6,845
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
Location: The Dirty Water
       

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#361 » by MasterIchiro » Tue Jun 4, 2024 7:23 pm

Skybox wrote:I see Clingan mocked to CHA in multiple outlets...If so, would Mark Williams be available at a reasonable price-considering his injury issues?

I'm under the impression that, despite occasionally putting up big numbers, CHA is generally disappointed with him.


Just today media reports claim the Rockets are fielding offers for Clingan at 3. Seems sufficient number of teams want to move up for him that he won't likely be at 6. If he's there, those same teams talking with the Rockets will be discussing Clingan with Charlotte.

Grizzlies are one of the teams. They have pick 9.

Rockets reportedly want Mikal Bridges. Nets are in the mix for pick 3 as well, but it's unclear who they're targeting at 3.
It has been written...
tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,581
And1: 1,286
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#362 » by tester551 » Thu Jun 6, 2024 5:17 pm

JustBuzzin wrote:Thybulle one of the best wing defenders in basketball.

Portland is a great trade back option imo.


I love the fit of Miller/Thybulle on the wing. We can get a bench piece with that #14 pick while getting a starter at the wing who happens to play defense.

Thybulle/#14 for #6 pick

Portland fan here. I think a 3-way with Chicago works better.

#6 to Bulls
Portland's future first returned to Blazers
#11 + #40 + Thybulle to Charlotte
User avatar
MPM
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,382
And1: 3,936
Joined: Mar 21, 2009
Location: Mouse Town
     

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#363 » by MPM » Thu Jun 6, 2024 5:50 pm

Personally? This draft? I'm doing this. #11, #40, and Thybulle for #6. Granted, I'm a Thybulle fan. Like his fit on our starting unit as well. #11 could have any number of guys there (hell, Topic after his knee news) and we could then package #40 and #42 to move into next year's draft (or into the 30's if there's someone we're keen on.)
Rich4114
RealGM
Posts: 11,352
And1: 4,688
Joined: Mar 11, 2004
Location: PA
   

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#364 » by Rich4114 » Fri Jun 7, 2024 1:39 pm

I’d probably do the above trade as well, one of the guys we’ve liked during this process will be there at 11
User avatar
MPM
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,382
And1: 3,936
Joined: Mar 21, 2009
Location: Mouse Town
     

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#365 » by MPM » Fri Jun 7, 2024 2:20 pm

Rich4114 wrote:I’d probably do the above trade as well, one of the guys we’ve liked during this process will be there at 11


Yeah, you get arguably the best wing defender in the league that now shoots a decent 3-ball and potentially get and sit Topic for the year, plus achieve second round flexibility? Down.
User avatar
dmutombo321
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,862
And1: 426
Joined: Feb 25, 2004
Location: Charlotte

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#366 » by dmutombo321 » Fri Jun 7, 2024 5:54 pm

Saw this proposal this morning.

CLT # 6 to OKC for their #12 this year + the 2025 first owed to them by the Heat (likely in the teens in next year's stronger draft) + 2025 second rounder owed to OKC by Memphis

https://www.si.com/nba/hornets/news/mock-trade-hornets-move-back-in-swap-with-familiar-trade-partner

Sent from my motorola edge (2021) using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
MasterIchiro
RealGM
Posts: 21,388
And1: 6,845
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
Location: The Dirty Water
       

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#367 » by MasterIchiro » Sat Jun 8, 2024 3:25 am

If Clingan is there 6 he is still a top-3 talent.

I think I'd want Dort + 12.
It has been written...
NCHeels2008
RealGM
Posts: 12,969
And1: 3,041
Joined: Aug 24, 2005

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#368 » by NCHeels2008 » Sun Jun 9, 2024 6:33 am

Just curious if we would want MPJ if Denver looks to move him?

I like him next to Miller and Williams as it gives us great size in the starting lineup regardless of Ball's health and the ticking time bomb known as Miles Bridges. The contract is rich but with the CBA raising teams caps 10% annually and the Hornets being a fairly cheap team with young guys I don't mind the dice roll depending on what it would take value wise.
JustBuzzin
RealGM
Posts: 16,356
And1: 13,816
Joined: Jun 10, 2023
 

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#369 » by JustBuzzin » Sun Jun 9, 2024 3:12 pm

No on MPJ.

Taking that contract pretty much locks us in with a core of Melo/Miller/MPJ/Bridges.

That is not something I want moving forward. Guy had 4 points in a elimination game. No thanks.
JustBuzzin
RealGM
Posts: 16,356
And1: 13,816
Joined: Jun 10, 2023
 

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#370 » by JustBuzzin » Sun Jun 9, 2024 7:13 pm

I like Melo to Washington for Kuzma/2 future 1st.


There is a chance we could have 2 top 5 picks in a loaded draft.

If we can come away with Flagg + another top 5 pick that would be amazing.
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,492
And1: 15,697
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#371 » by yosemiteben » Sun Jun 9, 2024 7:46 pm

You would trade Melo for 2 1sts without knowing what picks they'll be?

Dude just say you don't like Melo, this is ridiculous.
NCHeels2008
RealGM
Posts: 12,969
And1: 3,041
Joined: Aug 24, 2005

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#372 » by NCHeels2008 » Sun Jun 9, 2024 7:59 pm

JustBuzzin wrote:No on MPJ.

Taking that contract pretty much locks us in with a core of Melo/Miller/MPJ/Bridges.

That is not something I want moving forward. Guy had 4 points in a elimination game. No thanks.


I'd be thrilled for us to be in a game 7 in the 2nd round at this point. He also averaged 23/8 on 49% from 3 in the previous round. Considering whats going on with his family I wouldn't overextrapolate that he is a career choker based on one series. If you look at his last 3 playoffs together he's 15/7 on 38% from 3 and has REALLY strong gravity that can bend defenses to make life easier for the rest of the team.
JustBuzzin
RealGM
Posts: 16,356
And1: 13,816
Joined: Jun 10, 2023
 

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#373 » by JustBuzzin » Sun Jun 9, 2024 8:03 pm

yosemiteben wrote:You would trade Melo for 2 1sts without knowing what picks they'll be?

Dude just say you don't like Melo, this is ridiculous.

Yep I sure would. :D

The 25 class is pretty loaded. We will also be in the running with our own pick. I like our chances of coming away with 2 great players with the Washington pick and our pick.

If we trading Melo that would be the type of trade I would look for. I don't want any star for star trades. My focus would be on potential lottery teams and getting those picks.

For the last time I'm not a Melo hater. Everytime I discuss Melo I'm a hater lol.

I was literally praising him for driving his go kart on his roof. That man is maturing right before our eyes. Practicing his driving skills shows me he wants to improve as a driver. :D
JustBuzzin
RealGM
Posts: 16,356
And1: 13,816
Joined: Jun 10, 2023
 

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#374 » by JustBuzzin » Sun Jun 9, 2024 8:06 pm

NCHeels2008 wrote:
JustBuzzin wrote:No on MPJ.

Taking that contract pretty much locks us in with a core of Melo/Miller/MPJ/Bridges.

That is not something I want moving forward. Guy had 4 points in a elimination game. No thanks.


I'd be thrilled for us to be in a game 7 in the 2nd round at this point. He also averaged 23/8 on 49% from 3 in the previous round. Considering whats going on with his family I wouldn't overextrapolate that he is a career choker based on one series. If you look at his last 3 playoffs together he's 15/7 on 38% from 3 and has REALLY strong gravity that can bend defenses to make life easier for the rest of the team.

That's fine until you look at his contract.

He's a nice piece of you have talent around him. I'm not sure I like the fit with Melo/Miller. All 3 are shooters. Who's attacking the rim in this scenario?
NCHeels2008
RealGM
Posts: 12,969
And1: 3,041
Joined: Aug 24, 2005

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#375 » by NCHeels2008 » Sun Jun 9, 2024 8:23 pm

JustBuzzin wrote:
NCHeels2008 wrote:
JustBuzzin wrote:No on MPJ.

Taking that contract pretty much locks us in with a core of Melo/Miller/MPJ/Bridges.

That is not something I want moving forward. Guy had 4 points in a elimination game. No thanks.


I'd be thrilled for us to be in a game 7 in the 2nd round at this point. He also averaged 23/8 on 49% from 3 in the previous round. Considering whats going on with his family I wouldn't overextrapolate that he is a career choker based on one series. If you look at his last 3 playoffs together he's 15/7 on 38% from 3 and has REALLY strong gravity that can bend defenses to make life easier for the rest of the team.

That's fine until you look at his contract.

He's a nice piece of you have talent around him. I'm not sure I like the fit with Melo/Miller. All 3 are shooters. Who's attacking the rim in this scenario?


Mark Williams on PnRs with Ball and small guards who attack the basket are MUCH easier to find than tall lengthy shooters
JustBuzzin
RealGM
Posts: 16,356
And1: 13,816
Joined: Jun 10, 2023
 

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#376 » by JustBuzzin » Sun Jun 9, 2024 8:27 pm

NCHeels2008 wrote:
JustBuzzin wrote:
NCHeels2008 wrote:
I'd be thrilled for us to be in a game 7 in the 2nd round at this point. He also averaged 23/8 on 49% from 3 in the previous round. Considering whats going on with his family I wouldn't overextrapolate that he is a career choker based on one series. If you look at his last 3 playoffs together he's 15/7 on 38% from 3 and has REALLY strong gravity that can bend defenses to make life easier for the rest of the team.

That's fine until you look at his contract.

He's a nice piece of you have talent around him. I'm not sure I like the fit with Melo/Miller. All 3 are shooters. Who's attacking the rim in this scenario?


Mark Williams on PnRs with Ball and small guards who attack the basket are MUCH easier to find than tall lengthy shooters
A shooter on a max contract doesn't sound all that great.

We can just draft Knecht for much shooter. He's better at shooting and can create off the dribble.

MPJ would make more sense if we didn't already have Miller.
NCHeels2008
RealGM
Posts: 12,969
And1: 3,041
Joined: Aug 24, 2005

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#377 » by NCHeels2008 » Sun Jun 9, 2024 8:40 pm

JustBuzzin wrote:
NCHeels2008 wrote:
JustBuzzin wrote:That's fine until you look at his contract.

He's a nice piece of you have talent around him. I'm not sure I like the fit with Melo/Miller. All 3 are shooters. Who's attacking the rim in this scenario?


Mark Williams on PnRs with Ball and small guards who attack the basket are MUCH easier to find than tall lengthy shooters
A shooter on a max contract doesn't sound all that great.

We can just draft Knecht for much shooter. He's better at shooting and can create off the dribble.

MPJ would make more sense if we didn't already have Miller.


Nobody is signing with Charlotte, Bridges is a ticking time bomb, I'm sorry but I struggle how having two rangy shooters who can defend is a bad thing. This was the whole theory behind uniting PG and Kawhi which failed moreso due health not the theory of the team.

We also have a creator far beyond anything that team has had. You also get versatility in terms of position where Miller and MPJ can be the 2/3 or the 3/4. Porter's contract will expire when Miller's extension comes up, I'd honestly much rather have MPJ on his deal than roll the dice on Bridges (not that we can't afford both). This gives you a great defensive profile with strong coaching as you have tons of size (especially if Ball can stay upright at PG).
JustBuzzin
RealGM
Posts: 16,356
And1: 13,816
Joined: Jun 10, 2023
 

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#378 » by JustBuzzin » Sun Jun 9, 2024 8:44 pm

NCHeels2008 wrote:
JustBuzzin wrote:
NCHeels2008 wrote:
Mark Williams on PnRs with Ball and small guards who attack the basket are MUCH easier to find than tall lengthy shooters
A shooter on a max contract doesn't sound all that great.

We can just draft Knecht for much shooter. He's better at shooting and can create off the dribble.

MPJ would make more sense if we didn't already have Miller.


Nobody is signing with Charlotte, Bridges is a ticking time bomb, I'm sorry but I struggle how having two rangy shooters who can defend is a bad thing. This was the whole theory behind uniting PG and Kawhi which failed moreso due health not the theory of the team.

We also have a creator far beyond anything that team has had. You also get versatility in terms of position where Miller and MPJ can be the 2/3 or the 3/4. Porter's contract will expire when Miller's extension comes up, I'd honestly much rather have MPJ on his deal than roll the dice on Bridges (not that we can't afford both). This gives you a great defensive profile with strong coaching as you have tons of size (especially if Ball can stay upright at PG).

Well if Bridges leaves then you might can talk me into this trade as we would need another scorer to replace Bridges.

My thought was Bridges is returning and we would be locked into a core of Melo/Miller/MPJ/Bridges. I just didn't like that foursome together.
NCHeels2008
RealGM
Posts: 12,969
And1: 3,041
Joined: Aug 24, 2005

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#379 » by NCHeels2008 » Sun Jun 9, 2024 9:05 pm

JustBuzzin wrote:
NCHeels2008 wrote:
JustBuzzin wrote:A shooter on a max contract doesn't sound all that great.

We can just draft Knecht for much shooter. He's better at shooting and can create off the dribble.

MPJ would make more sense if we didn't already have Miller.


Nobody is signing with Charlotte, Bridges is a ticking time bomb, I'm sorry but I struggle how having two rangy shooters who can defend is a bad thing. This was the whole theory behind uniting PG and Kawhi which failed moreso due health not the theory of the team.

We also have a creator far beyond anything that team has had. You also get versatility in terms of position where Miller and MPJ can be the 2/3 or the 3/4. Porter's contract will expire when Miller's extension comes up, I'd honestly much rather have MPJ on his deal than roll the dice on Bridges (not that we can't afford both). This gives you a great defensive profile with strong coaching as you have tons of size (especially if Ball can stay upright at PG).

Well if Bridges leaves then you might can talk me into this trade as we would need another scorer to replace Bridges.

My thought was Bridges is returning and we would be locked into a core of Melo/Miller/MPJ/Bridges. I just didn't like that foursome together.


I think whether he returns or not he isn't a steady long-term bet and we shouldn't plan our franchise around him.
User avatar
SWedd523
RealGM
Posts: 13,598
And1: 6,548
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
   

Re: Fake Trade Thread #6 

Post#380 » by SWedd523 » Sun Jun 9, 2024 9:40 pm

JustBuzzin wrote:
yosemiteben wrote:You would trade Melo for 2 1sts without knowing what picks they'll be?

Dude just say you don't like Melo, this is ridiculous.

For the last time I'm not a Melo hater. Everytime I discuss Melo I'm a hater lol.


That's what Scooby and the Gang would refer to as a "clue"
Image

Return to Charlotte Hornets