




Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Mr B wrote:Micah Prescott wrote:He_Got_Game wrote:
More difficult for the Celtics? No they are not. The Mavs have two guys who will take 50 shots and the other guys waiting for a pass. That's not going to be enough.
It was enough to almost sweep the Wolves, but okay
Who had the #1 defense this year? Also who won Defensive Player of the Year? Asking for a friend.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
The_Ghost_of_JB wrote:Mr B wrote:CoP wrote:Yes, I'm worried about that. I hope they ease him in on the minutes so that he can build into it.
So will KP start or come off the bench tonight?
I was thinking the same thing. I think Joe has Al start and KP coming off the bench.
Mr B wrote:Mavrelous wrote:Special_Puppy wrote:Majority of ESPN experts think the Mavericks are favored. I can’t tell if people are just *really* leaning into the idea that “the team with the best player is favored” idea or if people are just *really* overthinking it https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/40279206/2024-nba-finals-predictions-celtics-mavericks-series-mvp
This is bizarre to me, the numbers couldn't be more clear, at least the knowledgeable (Lowe, Bontemps, Pelton) ones are going with Celtics.
Tim Legler is a well respected analyst and former player. Who did he pick?
Mr B wrote:Micah Prescott wrote:He_Got_Game wrote:
More difficult for the Celtics? No they are not. The Mavs have two guys who will take 50 shots and the other guys waiting for a pass. That's not going to be enough.
It was enough to almost sweep the Wolves, but okay
Who had the #1 defense this year? Also who won Defensive Player of the Year? Asking for a friend.
Micah Prescott wrote:He_Got_Game wrote:Micah Prescott wrote:
That just isn't realistic. Celtics might win this series but a healthy and hot Mavs team is more difficult than any of those teams. We really haven't seen the Mavs firing on all cylinders until now.
More difficult for the Celtics? No they are not. The Mavs have two guys who will take 50 shots and the other guys waiting for a pass. That's not going to be enough.
It was enough to almost sweep the Wolves, but okay
SLCceltic wrote: Wolves D was perfect for this Mavs team to take advantage of. Cs D just as dominate but very diff esp with regards to what they can throw at Luka and Kyrie
dc wrote:SLCceltic wrote: Wolves D was perfect for this Mavs team to take advantage of. Cs D just as dominate but very diff esp with regards to what they can throw at Luka and Kyrie
I think Luka is going to do Luka things. Same thing was said in the past about how the Clips had the perfect personnel to defend Luka and it really didn't stop him. Wolves had size up front with rim protection and a 6'9" McDaniels who was 2nd team all-defense. Most people before the Wolves-Mavs series started figured that was a pretty good setup to make life hard for him.
2 years ago, the Warriors had Wiggins playing the best ball of his life. He was praised for "holding" Luka to 32 ppg, though it was at a lower efficiency than what he did against Bridges in the previous series.
Again, Luka and probably Kyrie will most likely score the way they've been doing. They're too good and they've seen just about every scheme there is. This series comes down to if or how much the Mavs can slow down the Celts highly efficient and difficult to defend offense.
Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.
holdenwait wrote:friggin finally we are here!![]()
last night one of my digital watches I hadn't worn in a while was showing 6.6 as the date so I got all mixed up and excited, ran to get some food to sit down and watch only to realize it was set wrong and was thinking it was 7am instead of 7pm therefore the next day..![]()