Bob8 wrote:The Corey's wrote:Bob8 wrote:
How is D reason, if the best offensive team in Nba scored just 107 and 105 points?Mavs can't hope to win under 100 points games. They only hope is scoring 110+.They average 92 in first 2 games.
If you won't concede how bad the Mavs have been on defense it's clear your troll game isn't all that subtle.
You won't accept that the Mavs players are being left open on purpose. You won't accept that they're missing from 3 because they're not that good. You won't accept they're not ready for the moment. You won't accept Boston
Boston scores at will. This idea that the Mavs are actually doing good on offense but their shots aren't fallen is ridiculous.
The Mavs are getting the shots the Celtics want them to get.
Soon as they start hitting their "open" 3s then the Celtics just push the pace.
The Celtics would of scored 120 last night if they needed to. The Celtics are comfortable at the pace the Mavs are playing at.
You say. YA BUT 15% and dismiss my YA BUT 26%
Is it really that difficult to understand that no D can help Mavs, if they can't score 100 points? If results were 130:123, I would be first to agree that D is the biggest problem, but until Mavs can't score at least 110, there's nothing to be done in this series. And the main reasons for that are disastrous 3 points shooting and Kyrie having 35% Fg.
It actually seems that you are having a difficult time understanding that Dallas isn't playing good defense.
You can't bitch about missed wide open shots by Dallas on one hand and then dismiss that same stat by the Celtics.
Celtics are getting what whatever they want. They won't continue to miss.
Sitting there with a straight face talking about how bad Kyrie has been without acknowledging that Tatum has been hot garbage offensively is what I'm talking about.
If Tatum plays the way Tatum is supposed to play the Celtics are scoring 140 a game. Is it good Dallas defense? If so then explain why Jrue went off.
Dallas is playing absolutely horrendous on both ends of the floor.